Cannabis use and cognitive biases in people with first-episode psychosis and their siblings.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1017/S0033291724001715
L Roldan, T Sánchez-Gutiérrez, I Fernández-Arias, E Rodríguez-Toscano, G López, J Merchán-Naranjo, A Calvo, M Rapado-Castro, M Parellada, C Moreno, L Ferraro, D La Barbera, C La Cascia, G Tripoli, M Di Forti, R M Murray, D Quattrone, C Morgan, C Gayer-Anderson, P B Jones, H E Jongsma, J B Kirkbride, J van Os, P García-Portilla, S Al-Halabí, J Bobes, L de Haan, M Bernardo, J L Santos, J Sanjuán, M Arrojo, A Szoke, B P Rutten, S A Stilo, I Tarricone, A Lasalvia, S Tosato, P-M Llorca, P Rossi Menezes, J-P Selten, A Tortelli, E Velthorst, C M Del-Ben, C Arango, C M Díaz-Caneja
{"title":"Cannabis use and cognitive biases in people with first-episode psychosis and their siblings.","authors":"L Roldan, T Sánchez-Gutiérrez, I Fernández-Arias, E Rodríguez-Toscano, G López, J Merchán-Naranjo, A Calvo, M Rapado-Castro, M Parellada, C Moreno, L Ferraro, D La Barbera, C La Cascia, G Tripoli, M Di Forti, R M Murray, D Quattrone, C Morgan, C Gayer-Anderson, P B Jones, H E Jongsma, J B Kirkbride, J van Os, P García-Portilla, S Al-Halabí, J Bobes, L de Haan, M Bernardo, J L Santos, J Sanjuán, M Arrojo, A Szoke, B P Rutten, S A Stilo, I Tarricone, A Lasalvia, S Tosato, P-M Llorca, P Rossi Menezes, J-P Selten, A Tortelli, E Velthorst, C M Del-Ben, C Arango, C M Díaz-Caneja","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724001715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis use and familial vulnerability to psychosis have been associated with social cognition deficits. This study examined the potential relationship between cannabis use and cognitive biases underlying social cognition and functioning in patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), their siblings, and controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a sample of 543 participants with FEP, 203 siblings, and 1168 controls from the EU-GEI study using a correlational design. We used logistic regression analyses to examine the influence of clinical group, lifetime cannabis use frequency, and potency of cannabis use on cognitive biases, accounting for demographic and cognitive variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FEP patients showed increased odds of facial recognition processing (FRP) deficits (OR = 1.642, CI 1.123-2.402) relative to controls but not of speech illusions (SI) or jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias, with no statistically significant differences relative to siblings. Daily and occasional lifetime cannabis use were associated with decreased odds of SI (OR = 0.605, CI 0.368-0.997 and OR = 0.646, CI 0.457-0.913 respectively) and JTC bias (OR = 0.625, CI 0.422-0.925 and OR = 0.602, CI 0.460-0.787 respectively) compared with lifetime abstinence, but not with FRP deficits, in the whole sample. Within the cannabis user group, low-potency cannabis use was associated with increased odds of SI (OR = 1.829, CI 1.297-2.578, FRP deficits (OR = 1.393, CI 1.031-1.882, and JTC (OR = 1.661, CI 1.271-2.171) relative to high-potency cannabis use, with comparable effects in the three clinical groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest increased odds of cognitive biases in FEP patients who have never used cannabis and in low-potency users. Future studies should elucidate this association and its potential implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724001715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cannabis use and familial vulnerability to psychosis have been associated with social cognition deficits. This study examined the potential relationship between cannabis use and cognitive biases underlying social cognition and functioning in patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), their siblings, and controls.

Methods: We analyzed a sample of 543 participants with FEP, 203 siblings, and 1168 controls from the EU-GEI study using a correlational design. We used logistic regression analyses to examine the influence of clinical group, lifetime cannabis use frequency, and potency of cannabis use on cognitive biases, accounting for demographic and cognitive variables.

Results: FEP patients showed increased odds of facial recognition processing (FRP) deficits (OR = 1.642, CI 1.123-2.402) relative to controls but not of speech illusions (SI) or jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias, with no statistically significant differences relative to siblings. Daily and occasional lifetime cannabis use were associated with decreased odds of SI (OR = 0.605, CI 0.368-0.997 and OR = 0.646, CI 0.457-0.913 respectively) and JTC bias (OR = 0.625, CI 0.422-0.925 and OR = 0.602, CI 0.460-0.787 respectively) compared with lifetime abstinence, but not with FRP deficits, in the whole sample. Within the cannabis user group, low-potency cannabis use was associated with increased odds of SI (OR = 1.829, CI 1.297-2.578, FRP deficits (OR = 1.393, CI 1.031-1.882, and JTC (OR = 1.661, CI 1.271-2.171) relative to high-potency cannabis use, with comparable effects in the three clinical groups.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest increased odds of cognitive biases in FEP patients who have never used cannabis and in low-potency users. Future studies should elucidate this association and its potential implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻使用与首发精神病患者及其兄弟姐妹的认知偏差。
背景:吸食大麻和家族性精神病易感性与社会认知缺陷有关。本研究探讨了大麻使用与初发精神病(FEP)患者及其兄弟姐妹和对照组的社会认知和功能基础认知偏差之间的潜在关系:我们采用相关性设计分析了来自 EU-GEI 研究的 543 名 FEP 患者、203 名兄弟姐妹和 1168 名对照组样本。在考虑人口统计学和认知变量的情况下,我们使用逻辑回归分析来研究临床组别、终生大麻使用频率和大麻使用效力对认知偏差的影响:与对照组相比,FEP 患者出现面部识别处理(FRP)缺陷的几率增加(OR = 1.642,CI 1.123-2.402),但出现言语错觉(SI)或妄下结论(JTC)偏差的几率却没有增加,与兄弟姐妹相比没有统计学意义上的显著差异。在整个样本中,与终生禁欲相比,每日和终生偶尔吸食大麻与出现 SI(OR = 0.605,CI 分别为 0.368-0.997 和 OR = 0.646,CI 分别为 0.457-0.913 )和 JTC 偏差(OR = 0.625,CI 分别为 0.422-0.925 和 OR = 0.602,CI 分别为 0.460-0.787 )的几率降低有关,但与 FRP 缺陷无关。在大麻使用者群体中,相对于使用高浓度大麻,使用低浓度大麻增加了 SI(OR = 1.829,CI 1.297-2.578)、FRP 缺陷(OR = 1.393,CI 1.031-1.882)和 JTC(OR = 1.661,CI 1.271-2.171)的几率,在三个临床群体中效果相当:我们的研究结果表明,从未使用过大麻的 FEP 患者和低效大麻使用者出现认知偏差的几率增加。未来的研究应阐明这种关联及其潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity of the clinical high-risk and familial high-risk approaches for psychotic disorders - a systematic review and meta-analysis. The association between cannabis and depression: an updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dysfunction in the hierarchy of morphometric similarity network in Alzheimer's disease and its correlation with cognitive performance and gene expression profiles. Maternal depression during the perinatal period and its relationship with emotion regulation in young adulthood: An fMRI study in a prenatal birth cohort. Neural subgroups in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder during emotion regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1