L Roldan, T Sánchez-Gutiérrez, I Fernández-Arias, E Rodríguez-Toscano, G López, J Merchán-Naranjo, A Calvo, M Rapado-Castro, M Parellada, C Moreno, L Ferraro, D La Barbera, C La Cascia, G Tripoli, M Di Forti, R M Murray, D Quattrone, C Morgan, C Gayer-Anderson, P B Jones, H E Jongsma, J B Kirkbride, J van Os, P García-Portilla, S Al-Halabí, J Bobes, L de Haan, M Bernardo, J L Santos, J Sanjuán, M Arrojo, A Szoke, B P Rutten, S A Stilo, I Tarricone, A Lasalvia, S Tosato, P-M Llorca, P Rossi Menezes, J-P Selten, A Tortelli, E Velthorst, C M Del-Ben, C Arango, C M Díaz-Caneja
{"title":"Cannabis use and cognitive biases in people with first-episode psychosis and their siblings.","authors":"L Roldan, T Sánchez-Gutiérrez, I Fernández-Arias, E Rodríguez-Toscano, G López, J Merchán-Naranjo, A Calvo, M Rapado-Castro, M Parellada, C Moreno, L Ferraro, D La Barbera, C La Cascia, G Tripoli, M Di Forti, R M Murray, D Quattrone, C Morgan, C Gayer-Anderson, P B Jones, H E Jongsma, J B Kirkbride, J van Os, P García-Portilla, S Al-Halabí, J Bobes, L de Haan, M Bernardo, J L Santos, J Sanjuán, M Arrojo, A Szoke, B P Rutten, S A Stilo, I Tarricone, A Lasalvia, S Tosato, P-M Llorca, P Rossi Menezes, J-P Selten, A Tortelli, E Velthorst, C M Del-Ben, C Arango, C M Díaz-Caneja","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724001715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis use and familial vulnerability to psychosis have been associated with social cognition deficits. This study examined the potential relationship between cannabis use and cognitive biases underlying social cognition and functioning in patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), their siblings, and controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a sample of 543 participants with FEP, 203 siblings, and 1168 controls from the EU-GEI study using a correlational design. We used logistic regression analyses to examine the influence of clinical group, lifetime cannabis use frequency, and potency of cannabis use on cognitive biases, accounting for demographic and cognitive variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FEP patients showed increased odds of facial recognition processing (FRP) deficits (OR = 1.642, CI 1.123-2.402) relative to controls but not of speech illusions (SI) or jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias, with no statistically significant differences relative to siblings. Daily and occasional lifetime cannabis use were associated with decreased odds of SI (OR = 0.605, CI 0.368-0.997 and OR = 0.646, CI 0.457-0.913 respectively) and JTC bias (OR = 0.625, CI 0.422-0.925 and OR = 0.602, CI 0.460-0.787 respectively) compared with lifetime abstinence, but not with FRP deficits, in the whole sample. Within the cannabis user group, low-potency cannabis use was associated with increased odds of SI (OR = 1.829, CI 1.297-2.578, FRP deficits (OR = 1.393, CI 1.031-1.882, and JTC (OR = 1.661, CI 1.271-2.171) relative to high-potency cannabis use, with comparable effects in the three clinical groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest increased odds of cognitive biases in FEP patients who have never used cannabis and in low-potency users. Future studies should elucidate this association and its potential implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724001715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cannabis use and familial vulnerability to psychosis have been associated with social cognition deficits. This study examined the potential relationship between cannabis use and cognitive biases underlying social cognition and functioning in patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), their siblings, and controls.
Methods: We analyzed a sample of 543 participants with FEP, 203 siblings, and 1168 controls from the EU-GEI study using a correlational design. We used logistic regression analyses to examine the influence of clinical group, lifetime cannabis use frequency, and potency of cannabis use on cognitive biases, accounting for demographic and cognitive variables.
Results: FEP patients showed increased odds of facial recognition processing (FRP) deficits (OR = 1.642, CI 1.123-2.402) relative to controls but not of speech illusions (SI) or jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias, with no statistically significant differences relative to siblings. Daily and occasional lifetime cannabis use were associated with decreased odds of SI (OR = 0.605, CI 0.368-0.997 and OR = 0.646, CI 0.457-0.913 respectively) and JTC bias (OR = 0.625, CI 0.422-0.925 and OR = 0.602, CI 0.460-0.787 respectively) compared with lifetime abstinence, but not with FRP deficits, in the whole sample. Within the cannabis user group, low-potency cannabis use was associated with increased odds of SI (OR = 1.829, CI 1.297-2.578, FRP deficits (OR = 1.393, CI 1.031-1.882, and JTC (OR = 1.661, CI 1.271-2.171) relative to high-potency cannabis use, with comparable effects in the three clinical groups.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest increased odds of cognitive biases in FEP patients who have never used cannabis and in low-potency users. Future studies should elucidate this association and its potential implications.
期刊介绍:
Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.