Vital mobilities of medical oxygen: Theorising oxygen justice

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117464
Stephanie Sodero , Nimesh Dhungana , Felix Sandoe
{"title":"Vital mobilities of medical oxygen: Theorising oxygen justice","authors":"Stephanie Sodero ,&nbsp;Nimesh Dhungana ,&nbsp;Felix Sandoe","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How can societal circulations of medical oxygen be more just? Informed by disparities experienced and lessons learned from the global Covid pandemic, we use vital mobilities to describe and analyse the social lives of medical oxygen and explore opportunities for oxygen justice. Inspired by two distinct yet related theoretical spheres – breath studies and health justice – and contrasting the experiences of high- and low-and middle-income countries, we highlight disparities in medical oxygen availability as a basis to theorise oxygen justice. Engaging with health systems as complex social interactions spanning a range of actors and activities, we use a desk-based ‘follow the thing’ approach to trace medical oxygen. The key contribution of this paper is using a material entry point to illuminate the systemic patterning and perpetuating of injustices, underscoring how health as a fundamental human right remains an elusive principle, and building on this, to theorise oxygen justice. We define oxygen justice as the uninterrupted and transparent availability and accessibility of medical oxygen at the point of health service delivery, enabling patients to realise their fundamental right to health and well-being. Focusing on vision, localisation, and circulation, we propose avenues for research in preparation for future global respiratory emergencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"364 ","pages":"Article 117464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624009183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How can societal circulations of medical oxygen be more just? Informed by disparities experienced and lessons learned from the global Covid pandemic, we use vital mobilities to describe and analyse the social lives of medical oxygen and explore opportunities for oxygen justice. Inspired by two distinct yet related theoretical spheres – breath studies and health justice – and contrasting the experiences of high- and low-and middle-income countries, we highlight disparities in medical oxygen availability as a basis to theorise oxygen justice. Engaging with health systems as complex social interactions spanning a range of actors and activities, we use a desk-based ‘follow the thing’ approach to trace medical oxygen. The key contribution of this paper is using a material entry point to illuminate the systemic patterning and perpetuating of injustices, underscoring how health as a fundamental human right remains an elusive principle, and building on this, to theorise oxygen justice. We define oxygen justice as the uninterrupted and transparent availability and accessibility of medical oxygen at the point of health service delivery, enabling patients to realise their fundamental right to health and well-being. Focusing on vision, localisation, and circulation, we propose avenues for research in preparation for future global respiratory emergencies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医用氧气的生命流动性:氧气正义理论化。
医用氧气的社会流通如何才能更加公正?从全球 Covid 大流行的差异和经验教训中,我们利用生命流动性来描述和分析医用氧气的社会生活,并探索实现氧气公正的机会。受呼吸研究和健康正义这两个截然不同但又相互关联的理论领域的启发,并对比高收入国家和中低收入国家的经验,我们强调了医用氧气供应方面的差异,以此作为氧气正义理论的基础。卫生系统是一个复杂的社会互动系统,涉及一系列参与者和活动,我们采用了一种基于案头的 "跟踪事物 "方法来追踪医用氧气。本文的主要贡献在于以物质为切入点,揭示了不公正现象的系统模式化和长期化,强调了健康作为一项基本人权如何仍然是一项难以捉摸的原则,并在此基础上提出了氧气公正的理论。我们将 "氧气正义 "定义为在医疗服务提供点不间断、透明地提供和获取医用氧气,使患者能够实现其健康和福祉的基本权利。我们以视野、本地化和循环为重点,提出了为应对未来全球呼吸系统紧急状况做准备的研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Gazing into the crystal ball: Do adolescent survival expectations predict premature mortality risk in the United States? More doctors, better health? Consolidating evidence from Brazil's Mais Médicos program Vital mobilities of medical oxygen: Theorising oxygen justice State-level gender-affirming healthcare policy and depressive symptoms among LGBTQ+ youth Media bias in portrayals of mortality risks: Comparison of newspaper coverage to death rates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1