More doctors, better health? Consolidating evidence from Brazil's Mais Médicos program

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117559
Rudi Rocha
{"title":"More doctors, better health? Consolidating evidence from Brazil's Mais Médicos program","authors":"Rudi Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In their paper “More Doctors, better health? A generalised synthetic control approach to estimating impacts of increasing doctors under Brazil's Mais Medicos Programme”, Thomas, Millett, Soares and Hone add novel empirical evidence on the effects of Brazil's Programa Mais Medicos (PMM) on population health outcomes, reinforcing evidence that PMM has had limited effects: while PMM improved healthcare access in underserved regions, results show little impact on more extreme outcomes, such as mortality. Here I collect and connect evidence from the Brazilian context to discuss three potential explanations that, <em>inter alia</em>, could help us better understand why evidence from Thomas et al. (2024) as well as from previous research efforts points to a weak relationship between physician supply and population health. The potential explanations include health production complexity, system adaptability, and the increasing challenge of managing chronic diseases, emphasizing the need for more integrated healthcare approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"364 ","pages":"Article 117559"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362401013X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In their paper “More Doctors, better health? A generalised synthetic control approach to estimating impacts of increasing doctors under Brazil's Mais Medicos Programme”, Thomas, Millett, Soares and Hone add novel empirical evidence on the effects of Brazil's Programa Mais Medicos (PMM) on population health outcomes, reinforcing evidence that PMM has had limited effects: while PMM improved healthcare access in underserved regions, results show little impact on more extreme outcomes, such as mortality. Here I collect and connect evidence from the Brazilian context to discuss three potential explanations that, inter alia, could help us better understand why evidence from Thomas et al. (2024) as well as from previous research efforts points to a weak relationship between physician supply and population health. The potential explanations include health production complexity, system adaptability, and the increasing challenge of managing chronic diseases, emphasizing the need for more integrated healthcare approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生越多,健康越好?整合巴西 "更多医生 "计划的证据
Thomas, Millett, Soares 和 Hone 在他们的论文 "更多的医生,更好的健康?A generalised synthetic control approach to estimating impacts of increasing doctors under Brazil's Mais Medicos Programme "一文中,Thomas、Millett、Soares 和 Hone 补充了巴西 "更多医生计划"(PMM)对人口健康结果影响的新经验证据,强化了 "更多医生计划 "效果有限的证据:虽然 "更多医生计划 "改善了服务不足地区的医疗服务,但结果显示对死亡率等更极端的结果影响甚微。在此,我收集并联系巴西的证据,讨论三种可能的解释,这些解释可以帮助我们更好地理解为什么托马斯等人(2024 年)以及以往研究的证据显示医生供应与人口健康之间关系薄弱。这些潜在的解释包括卫生生产的复杂性、系统的适应性,以及慢性病管理日益严峻的挑战,强调需要更多的综合医疗保健方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Gazing into the crystal ball: Do adolescent survival expectations predict premature mortality risk in the United States? More doctors, better health? Consolidating evidence from Brazil's Mais Médicos program Vital mobilities of medical oxygen: Theorising oxygen justice State-level gender-affirming healthcare policy and depressive symptoms among LGBTQ+ youth Media bias in portrayals of mortality risks: Comparison of newspaper coverage to death rates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1