What are the environmental preferences of runners? Evidence from Guangzhou

IF 4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Applied Geography Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103469
Mingke Xie , Zhangxian Feng , Wang Long , Shijun Wang , Xiajing Liu , Gufeng Ji , Xiaoxuan Guo
{"title":"What are the environmental preferences of runners? Evidence from Guangzhou","authors":"Mingke Xie ,&nbsp;Zhangxian Feng ,&nbsp;Wang Long ,&nbsp;Shijun Wang ,&nbsp;Xiajing Liu ,&nbsp;Gufeng Ji ,&nbsp;Xiaoxuan Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of the built environment on running behavior is a subject of interest in existing theories. However, empirical evidence is limited due to data acquisition challenges. This paper addresses this gap by utilizing 3271 valid running routes sourced from the Chinese fitness app Keep to construct a running intensity index based on 10664 road segments in Guangzhou, China, with intensity values ranging from 0.000013 to 17.645459 m/m<sup>2</sup>. It analyzes the spatial characteristics of running intensity. Using global and local regression methods, the study explores runners’ environmental preferences concerning natural exposure, street environment, and neighborhood. The results indicate that streets with higher running intensity, exceeding 10.082 m/m<sup>2</sup>, are closer to water bodies and green spaces, while lower-intensity areas, below 2.049 m/m<sup>2</sup>, are often associated with busy traffic, noisy commercial activities, and sparsely populated regions. Global regression results demonstrate that positive environmental attributes, such as street greenery (OLS coefficient: 2.658∗∗), promote running behavior, while negative attributes like street density (OLS coefficient: −18.681∗∗), hinder it. However, several local regression results contradict these global findings. Our results offer valuable insights for planners and policymakers to develop targeted intervention strategies that enhance vibrant running streets, fostering the integration and symbiosis of urban public spaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103469"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622824002741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of the built environment on running behavior is a subject of interest in existing theories. However, empirical evidence is limited due to data acquisition challenges. This paper addresses this gap by utilizing 3271 valid running routes sourced from the Chinese fitness app Keep to construct a running intensity index based on 10664 road segments in Guangzhou, China, with intensity values ranging from 0.000013 to 17.645459 m/m2. It analyzes the spatial characteristics of running intensity. Using global and local regression methods, the study explores runners’ environmental preferences concerning natural exposure, street environment, and neighborhood. The results indicate that streets with higher running intensity, exceeding 10.082 m/m2, are closer to water bodies and green spaces, while lower-intensity areas, below 2.049 m/m2, are often associated with busy traffic, noisy commercial activities, and sparsely populated regions. Global regression results demonstrate that positive environmental attributes, such as street greenery (OLS coefficient: 2.658∗∗), promote running behavior, while negative attributes like street density (OLS coefficient: −18.681∗∗), hinder it. However, several local regression results contradict these global findings. Our results offer valuable insights for planners and policymakers to develop targeted intervention strategies that enhance vibrant running streets, fostering the integration and symbiosis of urban public spaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跑步者的环境偏好是什么?来自广州的证据
建筑环境对跑步行为的影响是现有理论所关注的一个主题。然而,由于数据采集方面的挑战,实证证据非常有限。本文利用中国健身应用 Keep 中的 3271 条有效跑步路线,构建了基于中国广州 10664 个路段的跑步强度指数,强度值范围为 0.000013 至 17.645459 m/m2。它分析了跑步强度的空间特征。研究采用全局和局部回归方法,探讨了跑步者对自然暴露、街道环境和邻里关系的环境偏好。结果表明,跑步强度较高的街道(超过 10.082 平方米/平方米)距离水体和绿地较近,而跑步强度较低的地区(低于 2.049 平方米/平方米)往往与繁忙的交通、嘈杂的商业活动和人烟稀少的地区有关。总体回归结果表明,街道绿化(OLS 系数:2.658∗∗)等积极的环境属性会促进跑步行为,而街道密度(OLS 系数:-18.681∗∗)等消极属性则会阻碍跑步行为。然而,一些局部回归结果与这些全球性发现相矛盾。我们的研究结果为规划者和政策制定者提供了有价值的见解,有助于他们制定有针对性的干预策略,增强街道的活力,促进城市公共空间的整合与共生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve and its influencing factors of CO2 emissions: Insights from development stages and rebound effects What are the environmental preferences of runners? Evidence from Guangzhou Unravelling urban typologies in Latin American cities: Integrating socioeconomic factors and urban configurations across scales Exploring the inequality in fine-grained primary healthcare accessibility in Macau based on high-resolution geospatial data under the 15-minute city framework From policy synergy to equitable greenspace: Unveiling the multifaceted effects of regional cooperation upon urban greenspace exposure inequality in China's megacity-regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1