Denitrifying bioreactor surface subsidence varies with age and cover

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107461
Laura E. Christianson , Reid D. Christianson , Christopher H. Hay , Anthony Seeman , Carolina Díaz-García , Gary W. Feyereisen , Lindsay Pease , Jeppe Kjaersgaard , Matthew J. Helmers , Michelle Soupir
{"title":"Denitrifying bioreactor surface subsidence varies with age and cover","authors":"Laura E. Christianson ,&nbsp;Reid D. Christianson ,&nbsp;Christopher H. Hay ,&nbsp;Anthony Seeman ,&nbsp;Carolina Díaz-García ,&nbsp;Gary W. Feyereisen ,&nbsp;Lindsay Pease ,&nbsp;Jeppe Kjaersgaard ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Helmers ,&nbsp;Michelle Soupir","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Surface subsidence at denitrifying woodchip bioreactors treating subsurface drainage has been anecdotally noted but has not been consistently documented and is thus poorly understood. Subsidence is of concern due to safety and potential exacerbation of ponding within the bioreactor but could also indicate flow restrictions within the woodchip bed. This study used 3D light detection and ranging (LiDAR) surveying on handheld devices (iPhone 12 Pro, iPad Pro) to provide minimum estimates of surface subsidence at 17 full-size bioreactors across a range of ages (0.1 to 14 years). Bioreactors with woodchips extending to the surface subsided faster than bioreactors with soil covers with median subsidence rates over the entire surface of 7.3 and 1.0 cm/y, respectively. Maximum subsidence averaged 40 ± 14 cm across all sites and tended to occur near the inflow manifold where subsidence could disproportionately impact hydraulic performance. Although these findings are limited to the bioreactors in the present evaluation and other sites may show different trends, it may be that subsidence is not reducible to aerobicity alone. Subsidence is not necessarily, on its own, the best individual indicator of the end of design life. In practice, checking for a consistent reduction in the amount of outflow over time is the best way to assess the need for a bioreactor woodchip recharge. Nevertheless, in this study, subsidence at full-size bioreactors was successfully approximated using a hand-held LiDAR device, and use of this method at additional sites is suggested, especially following bioreactor construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 107461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surface subsidence at denitrifying woodchip bioreactors treating subsurface drainage has been anecdotally noted but has not been consistently documented and is thus poorly understood. Subsidence is of concern due to safety and potential exacerbation of ponding within the bioreactor but could also indicate flow restrictions within the woodchip bed. This study used 3D light detection and ranging (LiDAR) surveying on handheld devices (iPhone 12 Pro, iPad Pro) to provide minimum estimates of surface subsidence at 17 full-size bioreactors across a range of ages (0.1 to 14 years). Bioreactors with woodchips extending to the surface subsided faster than bioreactors with soil covers with median subsidence rates over the entire surface of 7.3 and 1.0 cm/y, respectively. Maximum subsidence averaged 40 ± 14 cm across all sites and tended to occur near the inflow manifold where subsidence could disproportionately impact hydraulic performance. Although these findings are limited to the bioreactors in the present evaluation and other sites may show different trends, it may be that subsidence is not reducible to aerobicity alone. Subsidence is not necessarily, on its own, the best individual indicator of the end of design life. In practice, checking for a consistent reduction in the amount of outflow over time is the best way to assess the need for a bioreactor woodchip recharge. Nevertheless, in this study, subsidence at full-size bioreactors was successfully approximated using a hand-held LiDAR device, and use of this method at additional sites is suggested, especially following bioreactor construction.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反硝化生物反应器表面沉降随使用年限和覆盖层而变化
处理地下排水的反硝化木屑生物反应器的地表沉降是坊间传闻,但没有持续的记录,因此人们对其了解甚少。由于生物反应器内的安全和可能加剧的池塘沉降问题,沉降是一个值得关注的问题,但也可能表明木屑床内的流动限制。本研究使用手持设备(iPhone 12 Pro、iPad Pro)进行三维光探测和测距(LiDAR)测量,对 17 个不同年龄段(0.1 至 14 年)的全尺寸生物反应器的表面沉降进行了最小估算。表面覆盖木屑的生物反应器比表面覆盖土壤的生物反应器下沉速度更快,整个表面的中位下沉率分别为 7.3 厘米/年和 1.0 厘米/年。所有地点的最大下沉量平均为 40 ± 14 厘米,而且往往发生在流入歧管附近,因为那里的下沉可能会对水力性能产生不成比例的影响。虽然这些发现仅限于本次评估中的生物反应器,其他地点可能会呈现出不同的趋势,但沉降可能并不能仅仅归因于有氧因素。沉降本身并不一定是设计寿命终止的最佳单独指标。实际上,检查流出量是否随着时间的推移而持续减少,是评估生物反应器木片补给需求的最佳方法。不过,在这项研究中,使用手持式激光雷达设备成功地近似估算了全尺寸生物反应器的沉降情况,建议在更多地点使用这种方法,尤其是在生物反应器建造之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Effects of restorative treatments confirmed in a restored pond Living in a material world: Support for the use of natural and alternative materials in coastal restoration and living shorelines Editorial Board Long term performance of Nature-Based Solutions as decentralized wastewater treatment: a case study of a retail store in southern Italy Are floating mangrove breakwaters effective for wave attenuation? - A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1