Victor H. Souza , Jaakko O. Nieminen , Sergei Tugin , Lari M. Koponen , Ulf Ziemann , Oswaldo Baffa , Risto J. Ilmoniemi
{"title":"Probing the orientation specificity of excitatory and inhibitory circuitries in the primary motor cortex with multi-channel TMS","authors":"Victor H. Souza , Jaakko O. Nieminen , Sergei Tugin , Lari M. Koponen , Ulf Ziemann , Oswaldo Baffa , Risto J. Ilmoniemi","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Electric-field orientation is crucial for optimizing neuronal excitation in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Yet, the stimulus orientation effects on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) are poorly understood due to technical challenges in manipulating the TMS-induced stimulus orientation within milliseconds. We aimed to assess the orientation sensitivity of SICI and ICF paradigms and identify optimal orientations for motor evoked potential (MEP) facilitation and suppression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We applied paired-pulse multi-channel TMS to 12 healthy subjects with conditioning and test stimuli in the same, opposite, and perpendicular orientations to each other at four interstimulus intervals (ISI) to generate refractoriness, SICI, and ICF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>MEP modulation was affected by the conditioning- and test-stimulus orientation, being strongest when both pulses were in the same direction. MEP modulation with 2.5-ms and 6.0-ms ISIs were more sensitive to orientation changes than 0.5- and 8.0-ms ISIs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SICI and ICF orientation sensitivity exhibit a complex dependence on the conditioning stimulus orientation, which might be explained by anatomical and morphological arrangements of inhibitory and excitatory neuronal populations.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Distinct mechanisms mediating SICI and ICF are sensitive to stimulus orientation at specific ISIs, describing a structural–functional relationship that maximizes each effect at the cortical level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"169 ","pages":"Pages 23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724003262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Electric-field orientation is crucial for optimizing neuronal excitation in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Yet, the stimulus orientation effects on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) are poorly understood due to technical challenges in manipulating the TMS-induced stimulus orientation within milliseconds. We aimed to assess the orientation sensitivity of SICI and ICF paradigms and identify optimal orientations for motor evoked potential (MEP) facilitation and suppression.
Methods
We applied paired-pulse multi-channel TMS to 12 healthy subjects with conditioning and test stimuli in the same, opposite, and perpendicular orientations to each other at four interstimulus intervals (ISI) to generate refractoriness, SICI, and ICF.
Results
MEP modulation was affected by the conditioning- and test-stimulus orientation, being strongest when both pulses were in the same direction. MEP modulation with 2.5-ms and 6.0-ms ISIs were more sensitive to orientation changes than 0.5- and 8.0-ms ISIs.
Conclusion
SICI and ICF orientation sensitivity exhibit a complex dependence on the conditioning stimulus orientation, which might be explained by anatomical and morphological arrangements of inhibitory and excitatory neuronal populations.
Significance
Distinct mechanisms mediating SICI and ICF are sensitive to stimulus orientation at specific ISIs, describing a structural–functional relationship that maximizes each effect at the cortical level.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.