Effluent properties and gas emissions from a conventional wintering area and an alternative stand-off pad providing outdoor exercise to dairy cows

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109379
Elizabeth Álvarez-Chávez , Alexis Ruiz-González , Andrea Katherín-Carranza Díaz , Stéphane Godbout , Mylène Généreux , Caroline Côté , Alain N. Rousseau , Sébastien Fournel
{"title":"Effluent properties and gas emissions from a conventional wintering area and an alternative stand-off pad providing outdoor exercise to dairy cows","authors":"Elizabeth Álvarez-Chávez ,&nbsp;Alexis Ruiz-González ,&nbsp;Andrea Katherín-Carranza Díaz ,&nbsp;Stéphane Godbout ,&nbsp;Mylène Généreux ,&nbsp;Caroline Côté ,&nbsp;Alain N. Rousseau ,&nbsp;Sébastien Fournel","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stand-off pads are uncovered outdoor yards built with absorbent materials, where cattle can be raised to minimize the environmental impact associated with nutrient runoff and gas emissions from manure management. Consequently, they emerge as a prospective alternative to traditional wintering pens, facilitating movement opportunities for dairy cows typically confined to tie-stalls. The objective of this study was to validate the potential of an improved stand-off pad concept (with sphagnum peat moss, woodchips and biochar) aerated with the exhaust air from the adjacent barn, in contrast to a conventional wintering pen, to provide outdoor exercise to dairy cows housed year-round in tie-stall barns Quebec, Canada. Both outdoor yards (28 m<sup>2</sup>) housed one Holstein dairy cow during 1.5 hr, twice daily (morning and afternoon), throughout two 9-week periods (summer and winter). Sampling of effluents and measurement of greenhouse gases from each area were performed on a weekly basis over the course of the study period for both seasons. Results showed that the stand-off pad was more efficient in removing biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen, suspended solids, and <em>E. coli</em> (32.9, 194.2, 19.8, and 24.3 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, and 2.2 CFU (100 mL)<sup>−1</sup>, respectively), relative to the wintering pen (95.3, 379.5, 54.2, and 43 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, and 197 CFU (100 mL)<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). Additionally, relative to the wintering pen, the stand-off pad media filter achieved a greater absorption capacity (water effluent volumes of 18.8 m³ and 25.3 m³ respectively). Aeration did not improve the removal of contaminants but resulted in lower nitrous oxide emissions compared to the wintering pen. A nitrogen balance was also calculated, obtaining 62 % recovery for Stand-off pen and 45 % for the winter pen. Improved stand-off pads can indeed provide a more sustainable and comfortable environment for dairy cows. By reducing mud and manure buildup, these pads help maintain cleaner and healthier conditions, which is beneficial for both the cows and the environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"380 ","pages":"Article 109379"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924004973","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stand-off pads are uncovered outdoor yards built with absorbent materials, where cattle can be raised to minimize the environmental impact associated with nutrient runoff and gas emissions from manure management. Consequently, they emerge as a prospective alternative to traditional wintering pens, facilitating movement opportunities for dairy cows typically confined to tie-stalls. The objective of this study was to validate the potential of an improved stand-off pad concept (with sphagnum peat moss, woodchips and biochar) aerated with the exhaust air from the adjacent barn, in contrast to a conventional wintering pen, to provide outdoor exercise to dairy cows housed year-round in tie-stall barns Quebec, Canada. Both outdoor yards (28 m2) housed one Holstein dairy cow during 1.5 hr, twice daily (morning and afternoon), throughout two 9-week periods (summer and winter). Sampling of effluents and measurement of greenhouse gases from each area were performed on a weekly basis over the course of the study period for both seasons. Results showed that the stand-off pad was more efficient in removing biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen, suspended solids, and E. coli (32.9, 194.2, 19.8, and 24.3 mg L−1, and 2.2 CFU (100 mL)−1, respectively), relative to the wintering pen (95.3, 379.5, 54.2, and 43 mg L−1, and 197 CFU (100 mL)−1, respectively). Additionally, relative to the wintering pen, the stand-off pad media filter achieved a greater absorption capacity (water effluent volumes of 18.8 m³ and 25.3 m³ respectively). Aeration did not improve the removal of contaminants but resulted in lower nitrous oxide emissions compared to the wintering pen. A nitrogen balance was also calculated, obtaining 62 % recovery for Stand-off pen and 45 % for the winter pen. Improved stand-off pads can indeed provide a more sustainable and comfortable environment for dairy cows. By reducing mud and manure buildup, these pads help maintain cleaner and healthier conditions, which is beneficial for both the cows and the environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统越冬区和为奶牛提供户外运动的替代隔离垫的污水特性和气体排放
隔离垫是用吸水材料建造的无盖室外堆场,可在此饲养奶牛,以最大限度地减少粪便管理产生的养分径流和气体排放对环境的影响。因此,它们有望成为传统越冬围栏的替代品,为通常被限制在扎栏内的奶牛提供活动机会。本研究的目的是验证一种改进的隔离垫概念(使用泥炭藓、木屑和生物炭)的潜力,与传统的越冬围栏相比,这种垫子利用相邻牛舍排出的空气进行通气,可为全年饲养在加拿大魁北克扎栏牛舍中的奶牛提供户外运动。两个室外牛场(28 平方米)都饲养了一头荷斯坦奶牛,在两个为期 9 周的时间段内(夏季和冬季),每天两次(上午和下午),每次 1.5 小时。在两个季节的研究期间,每周都对每个区域的污水进行采样并测量温室气体。结果显示,相对于越冬围栏(分别为 95.3、379.5、54.2 和 43 mg L-1 以及 197 CFU (100 mL)-1),隔离垫在去除生化需氧量、化学需氧量、总氮、悬浮固体和大肠杆菌方面更有效(分别为 32.9、194.2、19.8 和 24.3 mg L-1 以及 2.2 CFU (100 mL)-1)。此外,与越冬栏相比,隔离垫介质过滤器的吸收能力更大(出水量分别为 18.8 立方米和 25.3 立方米)。与越冬围栏相比,曝气并没有提高污染物的去除率,但却降低了一氧化二氮的排放量。此外,还计算了氮平衡,结果显示隔离围栏的回收率为 62%,越冬围栏的回收率为 45%。改进后的隔离栏确实能为奶牛提供更可持续和更舒适的环境。通过减少泥浆和粪便的堆积,这些隔栏有助于保持更清洁、更健康的环境,这对奶牛和环境都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Assessing organic carbon sequestration in soil aggregates for building high quality carbon stocks in improved grazing lands Exploring the influence of cover crops with native plant species on soil and berry microbiota in a Moscatel Galego vineyard: Implications for sustainable viticulture Grassland irrigation and grazing prohibition have significantly affected vegetation and microbial diversity by changing soil temperature and moisture, evidences from a 6 years experiment of typical temperate grassland Effects of crop rotation on plant- and microbial-derived carbon within particulate and mineral fractions in paddy soils Pseudostellaria heterophylla cultivar mixtures driven changes in rhizosphere metabolites to suppress soil-borne Fusarium disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1