A constrained instrumental variable method for identification of industrial robots

IF 5.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Control Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106168
Fabio Ardiani , Alexandre Janot , Mourad Benoussaad
{"title":"A constrained instrumental variable method for identification of industrial robots","authors":"Fabio Ardiani ,&nbsp;Alexandre Janot ,&nbsp;Mourad Benoussaad","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Robot identification is a prolific topic with a long history of results spanning decades. In recent years, there has been a renewal of interest in this problem mainly due to a rapid increase in robotic hardware platforms capable of accurate model-based control. The standard approach exploits the inverse dynamic model’s linearity to dynamic parameters and uses the linear least-squares (LS) estimation. Since we identify robots with closed-loop procedures, a correlation between errors remains, and we should prefer the Instrumental Variable (IV) method over the LS estimation. Thanks to the increase in computational power, recent works suggest inserting physical constraints to ensure the physical plausibility of estimates. These works have emphasized the usefulness of these physical constraints, but few papers consider their insertion into IV methods, the consistency and optimality of estimates, and the effect of constraints on estimates not addressed. This paper presents a new constrained IV approach that uses physical constraints. It consists of two nested iterative algorithms: an outer one that is a standard IV method and an inner one that accounts for the constraints solved by a Gauss–Newton algorithm. Besides, the conditions to obtain consistent and optimal estimates are emphasized. Experimental results and comparisons with other methods carried out with the TX40 robot show the feasibility and effectiveness of such an IV method: we can identify 60 physically consistent parameters in less than one minute.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 106168"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124003277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robot identification is a prolific topic with a long history of results spanning decades. In recent years, there has been a renewal of interest in this problem mainly due to a rapid increase in robotic hardware platforms capable of accurate model-based control. The standard approach exploits the inverse dynamic model’s linearity to dynamic parameters and uses the linear least-squares (LS) estimation. Since we identify robots with closed-loop procedures, a correlation between errors remains, and we should prefer the Instrumental Variable (IV) method over the LS estimation. Thanks to the increase in computational power, recent works suggest inserting physical constraints to ensure the physical plausibility of estimates. These works have emphasized the usefulness of these physical constraints, but few papers consider their insertion into IV methods, the consistency and optimality of estimates, and the effect of constraints on estimates not addressed. This paper presents a new constrained IV approach that uses physical constraints. It consists of two nested iterative algorithms: an outer one that is a standard IV method and an inner one that accounts for the constraints solved by a Gauss–Newton algorithm. Besides, the conditions to obtain consistent and optimal estimates are emphasized. Experimental results and comparisons with other methods carried out with the TX40 robot show the feasibility and effectiveness of such an IV method: we can identify 60 physically consistent parameters in less than one minute.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于识别工业机器人的受限工具变量法
机器人识别是一个多产的课题,其成果由来已久,时间跨度长达数十年。近年来,人们对这一问题重新产生了兴趣,主要原因是能够进行基于模型的精确控制的机器人硬件平台迅速增加。标准方法是利用反动态模型与动态参数的线性关系,并使用线性最小二乘(LS)估计。由于我们使用闭环程序识别机器人,误差之间仍存在相关性,因此我们应优先采用工具变量(IV)法,而不是 LS 估算法。由于计算能力的提高,最近的研究建议插入物理约束,以确保估计值的物理可信性。这些著作强调了这些物理约束的有用性,但很少有论文考虑在 IV 方法中插入物理约束、估计值的一致性和最优性以及约束对估计值的影响等问题。本文提出了一种使用物理约束的新约束 IV 方法。它由两个嵌套迭代算法组成:一个外层算法是标准 IV 方法,另一个内层算法通过高斯-牛顿算法求解约束条件。此外,还强调了获得一致和最优估计的条件。使用 TX40 机器人进行的实验结果和与其他方法的比较显示了这种 IV 方法的可行性和有效性:我们可以在一分钟内确定 60 个物理上一致的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Control Engineering Practice
Control Engineering Practice 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
12.20%
发文量
183
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper. The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC. Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.
期刊最新文献
A novel soft sensor modeling method based on gated stacked target-supervised VAE with variable weights Editorial Board High-precision control of a robotic arm using frequency-based data-driven methods Multi-dynamic target coverage tracking control strategy based on multi-UAV collaboration A switched model predictive control with parametric weights-based mode transition strategy for a novel parallel hybrid electric vehicle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1