Formation and endogenous feedback mechanism of farmers’ bioenergy feedstocks planting decisions

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Development Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101107
Ziqi Zeng , Fang Wang , Yanfen Feng , Hongjian Huang , Yingshi Zhang , Zilong Chen , Sile Liu
{"title":"Formation and endogenous feedback mechanism of farmers’ bioenergy feedstocks planting decisions","authors":"Ziqi Zeng ,&nbsp;Fang Wang ,&nbsp;Yanfen Feng ,&nbsp;Hongjian Huang ,&nbsp;Yingshi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zilong Chen ,&nbsp;Sile Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sustainable supply of bioenergy is currently facing a bottleneck due to the impact of farmers’ planting decisions. Identifying the formation and endogenous feedback mechanisms of farmers’ planting decisions on bioenergy feedstocks is crucial to the bioenergy industry. While some studies have explored the factors affecting farmers’ production of bioenergy feedstocks, the interaction mechanisms of these factors and the endogenous feedback mechanism of the decision-making system have not been studied. To address this research gap, we developed a Bounded Rationality Decision-Making Reasoning System (BRDMRS) that considers individual and environmental factors to the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) analysis framework. Using survey data from 590 farmers in Suixi County, Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, we constructed Decision-Making Formation Model (DFM) and Decision-Making Endogenous Feedback Model (DEFM) to analyze the formation and feedback mechanisms of farmers’ bioenergy planting behavior. The study concludes that farmers’ behavioral decision-making follows the basic framework of the BDI model and is formed through multi-level feedback by various influencing factors, such as farmers’ personal and family endowments, understanding of the farming environment, farmers’ bioenergy cognition, information acquisition, risk perception, and desire. And the direct and indirect effects of the acting factors on the acted factors are not necessarily in the same direction. The simulated results suggest that farmers’ planting behavior changes from positive to negative, indicating a shift from risk-seeking to risk-aversion. By adjusting the weights of variables, eight scenarios are set up for simulation, and it is found that although farmers’ planting behavior is improved, the trend over time do not change significantly. Farmers’ planting behavior has experienced a change from bounded rationality to rationality. Farmers’ gradually negative planting behavior is related to the unsatisfied expectation of high economic returns and technical guidance in the early stage. To ensure the sustainable supply of bioenergy, adequate financial support is crucial to induce the active participation of farmers in the unstable development of bioenergy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101107"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464524001453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sustainable supply of bioenergy is currently facing a bottleneck due to the impact of farmers’ planting decisions. Identifying the formation and endogenous feedback mechanisms of farmers’ planting decisions on bioenergy feedstocks is crucial to the bioenergy industry. While some studies have explored the factors affecting farmers’ production of bioenergy feedstocks, the interaction mechanisms of these factors and the endogenous feedback mechanism of the decision-making system have not been studied. To address this research gap, we developed a Bounded Rationality Decision-Making Reasoning System (BRDMRS) that considers individual and environmental factors to the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) analysis framework. Using survey data from 590 farmers in Suixi County, Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, we constructed Decision-Making Formation Model (DFM) and Decision-Making Endogenous Feedback Model (DEFM) to analyze the formation and feedback mechanisms of farmers’ bioenergy planting behavior. The study concludes that farmers’ behavioral decision-making follows the basic framework of the BDI model and is formed through multi-level feedback by various influencing factors, such as farmers’ personal and family endowments, understanding of the farming environment, farmers’ bioenergy cognition, information acquisition, risk perception, and desire. And the direct and indirect effects of the acting factors on the acted factors are not necessarily in the same direction. The simulated results suggest that farmers’ planting behavior changes from positive to negative, indicating a shift from risk-seeking to risk-aversion. By adjusting the weights of variables, eight scenarios are set up for simulation, and it is found that although farmers’ planting behavior is improved, the trend over time do not change significantly. Farmers’ planting behavior has experienced a change from bounded rationality to rationality. Farmers’ gradually negative planting behavior is related to the unsatisfied expectation of high economic returns and technical guidance in the early stage. To ensure the sustainable supply of bioenergy, adequate financial support is crucial to induce the active participation of farmers in the unstable development of bioenergy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农民生物能源原料种植决策的形成与内生反馈机制
由于农民种植决策的影响,生物能源的可持续供应目前正面临瓶颈。确定农民种植生物能源原料决策的形成和内生反馈机制对生物能源产业至关重要。虽然一些研究探讨了影响农民生产生物能源原料的因素,但这些因素的相互作用机制和决策系统的内生反馈机制尚未得到研究。针对这一研究空白,我们开发了一个有界理性决策推理系统(BRDMRS),在信念-欲望-意向(BDI)分析框架中考虑了个体和环境因素。利用广东省湛江市遂溪县 590 户农民的调查数据,构建了决策形成模型(DFM)和决策内生反馈模型(DEFM),分析了农民生物能源种植行为的形成和反馈机制。研究认为,农户的行为决策遵循 BDI 模型的基本框架,由农户的个人和家庭禀赋、对农业环境的理解、农户的生物能源认知、信息获取、风险感知和愿望等多种影响因素通过多层次反馈形成。而作用因素对被作用因素的直接和间接影响不一定是同方向的。模拟结果表明,农户的种植行为由积极转变为消极,表明农户的种植行为由寻求风险转变为规避风险。通过调整变量权重,设定了八种情景进行模拟,发现农民的种植行为虽然有所改善,但随时间变化的趋势并不明显。农民的种植行为经历了从有界理性到理性的转变。农民逐渐消极的种植行为与前期对高经济收益和技术指导的期望未得到满足有关。为确保生物能源的可持续供应,充足的资金支持是促使农民积极参与生物能源不稳定发展的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Legal transplantation of blue bond regulation in Indonesia Editorial Board Local authorities or national frameworks? A global review on coastal protection policies Consequences of anthropization in the Veredas environments in the Brazilian Cerrado Geographic perspectives on sustainability: Towards a conceptual framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1