{"title":"Methods for monitoring carbon emissions from ships: A practical perspective","authors":"Xin Shi , Qing Xi , Zekun Zhang , Zhiyuan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring carbon emissions from ships is crucial as part of the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) greenhouse gas emissions reduction action. The present study compared four methods for carbon emissions monitoring. A comprehensive analytical framework was established, and differences between direct measurements, ship-operational-data-based estimates, noon-report-based estimates, and automatic-identification-system (AIS)-based estimates were analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) The four methods generally produce consistent results, albeit with moderate differences. (2) No method is clearly superior to the others, and each has its relative merits in some scenarios. (3) To ensure compliance with IMO regulations, current approaches to monitoring emissions from fuel consumption should continue to be used, and noon-report data should be supplemented by operational data collected from automated information systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101192"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525000582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Monitoring carbon emissions from ships is crucial as part of the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) greenhouse gas emissions reduction action. The present study compared four methods for carbon emissions monitoring. A comprehensive analytical framework was established, and differences between direct measurements, ship-operational-data-based estimates, noon-report-based estimates, and automatic-identification-system (AIS)-based estimates were analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) The four methods generally produce consistent results, albeit with moderate differences. (2) No method is clearly superior to the others, and each has its relative merits in some scenarios. (3) To ensure compliance with IMO regulations, current approaches to monitoring emissions from fuel consumption should continue to be used, and noon-report data should be supplemented by operational data collected from automated information systems.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.