Exploiting multiple influence pattern of event organizer for event recommendation

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Processing & Management Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103966
Xiaofeng Han, Xiangwu Meng, Yujie Zhang
{"title":"Exploiting multiple influence pattern of event organizer for event recommendation","authors":"Xiaofeng Han,&nbsp;Xiangwu Meng,&nbsp;Yujie Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing event recommendation methods pay attention to contextual factors to approach sparse and cold-start problem, in which organizer influence is a vital factor in Event-based Social Networks (EBSNs). However, existing studies ignore multiple influence pattern of organizer at event-level. In this paper, we distinguish organizer role and user (participant) role, exploring the organizer multiple influence pattern at event-level based on two scores: organizer behavior score and organizer popularity score. Besides, the organizer influence at event-level is dynamic, the step length is the time difference between two adjacent events from same organizer. Based on this discovery, we first calculate the organizer behavior score and organizer popularity score, then we propose an Organizer Multiple Influence Pattern-aware model (OMIP) based on topic model to capture user event topic preferences under the multiple influence pattern, which models the correlation and alternative-relation between user behavior topic and influence pattern. OMIP depends on the user’s participation records, user’s profiles and organizer’s profiles. OMIP outperforms state-of-the-art baselines with remarkable improvements in terms of Recall@k, NDCG@k, F1@k, and AUC. Specifically, Recall@5 improvement of 0.22%–16.41%; NDCG@5 improvement of 1.25%–10.81%; F1@5 improvement of 3.49%–16.43%; AUC improvement of 0.70%–1.62% on two real-world EBSNs datasets. Besides, OMIP can learn semantically topics and patterns which are useful to explain recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 2","pages":"Article 103966"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645732400325X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing event recommendation methods pay attention to contextual factors to approach sparse and cold-start problem, in which organizer influence is a vital factor in Event-based Social Networks (EBSNs). However, existing studies ignore multiple influence pattern of organizer at event-level. In this paper, we distinguish organizer role and user (participant) role, exploring the organizer multiple influence pattern at event-level based on two scores: organizer behavior score and organizer popularity score. Besides, the organizer influence at event-level is dynamic, the step length is the time difference between two adjacent events from same organizer. Based on this discovery, we first calculate the organizer behavior score and organizer popularity score, then we propose an Organizer Multiple Influence Pattern-aware model (OMIP) based on topic model to capture user event topic preferences under the multiple influence pattern, which models the correlation and alternative-relation between user behavior topic and influence pattern. OMIP depends on the user’s participation records, user’s profiles and organizer’s profiles. OMIP outperforms state-of-the-art baselines with remarkable improvements in terms of Recall@k, NDCG@k, F1@k, and AUC. Specifically, Recall@5 improvement of 0.22%–16.41%; NDCG@5 improvement of 1.25%–10.81%; F1@5 improvement of 3.49%–16.43%; AUC improvement of 0.70%–1.62% on two real-world EBSNs datasets. Besides, OMIP can learn semantically topics and patterns which are useful to explain recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用活动组织者的多重影响模式进行活动推荐
现有的事件推荐方法关注上下文因素,以解决稀疏和冷启动问题,其中组织者的影响力是基于事件的社交网络(EBSN)中的一个重要因素。然而,现有研究忽视了组织者在事件层面的多重影响模式。本文区分了组织者角色和用户(参与者)角色,基于组织者行为得分和组织者受欢迎程度得分这两个得分,探讨了组织者在事件层面的多重影响模式。此外,事件级的组织者影响力是动态的,步长是同一组织者的两个相邻事件之间的时间差。基于这一发现,我们首先计算了组织者行为得分和组织者受欢迎程度得分,然后提出了基于主题模型的组织者多重影响模式感知模型(OMIP),以捕捉多重影响模式下的用户事件主题偏好,该模型对用户行为主题和影响模式之间的相关性和替代性进行了建模。OMIP 依赖于用户的参与记录、用户档案和组织者档案。OMIP 在 Recall@k、NDCG@k、F1@k 和 AUC 方面的表现优于最先进的基线。具体来说,在两个真实的 EBSNs 数据集上,Recall@5 提高了 0.22%-16.41%;NDCG@5 提高了 1.25%-10.81%;F1@5 提高了 3.49%-16.43%;AUC 提高了 0.70%-1.62%。此外,OMIP 还能学习语义主题和模式,这对解释推荐非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
期刊最新文献
Few-shot multi-hop reasoning via reinforcement learning and path search strategy over temporal knowledge graphs Basis is also explanation: Interpretable Legal Judgment Reasoning prompted by multi-source knowledge Extracting key insights from earnings call transcript via information-theoretic contrastive learning Advancing rule learning in knowledge graphs with structure-aware graph transformer DCIB: Dual contrastive information bottleneck for knowledge-aware recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1