The role of nutrition background on motivations, barriers, and adherence to a vegan diet: A qualitative study of the vegan eating habits and nutritional evaluation survey (VEGAN-EatS)

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105378
Martin Hindermann Santini , Heloísa C. Santo André , Bruna Caruso Mazzolani , Fabiana Infante Smaira , Gabriel Perri Esteves , Alice Erwig Leitão , Bruno Gualano , Hamilton Roschel
{"title":"The role of nutrition background on motivations, barriers, and adherence to a vegan diet: A qualitative study of the vegan eating habits and nutritional evaluation survey (VEGAN-EatS)","authors":"Martin Hindermann Santini ,&nbsp;Heloísa C. Santo André ,&nbsp;Bruna Caruso Mazzolani ,&nbsp;Fabiana Infante Smaira ,&nbsp;Gabriel Perri Esteves ,&nbsp;Alice Erwig Leitão ,&nbsp;Bruno Gualano ,&nbsp;Hamilton Roschel","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to investigate the motivations, enablers, barriers and attitudes towards the vegan movement within people with distinct formal backgrounds in nutrition. To that end, a cross-sectional, qualitative study was conducted with two groups of vegan individuals: registered dietitians or undergraduate nutrition students (NUT) and non-health professionals (NHP). Participants filled out The General Knowledge on Nutrition Questionnaire and attended to focus groups, analyzed using MAXQDA software. Twenty individuals (NUT:7F,3M; NHP:9F,1M), with mean age of 32 ± 12 years, and 24 ± 4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> BMI were assessed. NUT presented a higher score of nutritional knowledge. Both groups were motivated by animal welfare and environmental concerns, although NUT group was also influenced by personal relationships, while NHP group highlighted seeking health benefits. Being enrolled in a graduate nutrition program was viewed as a tool to have access to resources, people and knowledge that supported their dietary decisions. NUT group demonstrated greater concern about food quality, choosing unprocessed foods, whilst NHP group demonstrated ethical concerns, preferring to consume from small producers and local businesses. Participant's perceptions were also influenced by their experiences and knowledge, with NHP believing that vegan diets are inherently healthier, while NUT attributed the improved food quality to vegans' careful attention to their dietary choices. Our findings suggest that while both groups share common motivations, their different depths of nutritional knowledge seem to have important impacts on their experience in adhering to a vegan diet, highlighting the critical role of seeking knowledge on nutrition in supporting sustainable vegan dietary practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 105378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002805","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the motivations, enablers, barriers and attitudes towards the vegan movement within people with distinct formal backgrounds in nutrition. To that end, a cross-sectional, qualitative study was conducted with two groups of vegan individuals: registered dietitians or undergraduate nutrition students (NUT) and non-health professionals (NHP). Participants filled out The General Knowledge on Nutrition Questionnaire and attended to focus groups, analyzed using MAXQDA software. Twenty individuals (NUT:7F,3M; NHP:9F,1M), with mean age of 32 ± 12 years, and 24 ± 4 kg/m2 BMI were assessed. NUT presented a higher score of nutritional knowledge. Both groups were motivated by animal welfare and environmental concerns, although NUT group was also influenced by personal relationships, while NHP group highlighted seeking health benefits. Being enrolled in a graduate nutrition program was viewed as a tool to have access to resources, people and knowledge that supported their dietary decisions. NUT group demonstrated greater concern about food quality, choosing unprocessed foods, whilst NHP group demonstrated ethical concerns, preferring to consume from small producers and local businesses. Participant's perceptions were also influenced by their experiences and knowledge, with NHP believing that vegan diets are inherently healthier, while NUT attributed the improved food quality to vegans' careful attention to their dietary choices. Our findings suggest that while both groups share common motivations, their different depths of nutritional knowledge seem to have important impacts on their experience in adhering to a vegan diet, highlighting the critical role of seeking knowledge on nutrition in supporting sustainable vegan dietary practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
营养背景对素食的动机、障碍和坚持的作用:对素食者饮食习惯和营养评估调查(VEGAN-EatS)的定性研究
本研究旨在调查具有不同正规营养学背景的人对素食运动的动机、推动因素、障碍和态度。为此,我们对注册营养师或营养学本科生(NUT)和非卫生专业人员(NHP)两组素食者进行了横断面定性研究。参与者填写了《营养常识问卷》,并参加了焦点小组,使用 MAXQDA 软件进行分析。接受评估的 20 人(NUT:7F,3M;NHP:9F,1M),平均年龄为 32 ± 12 岁,体重指数为 24 ± 4 kg/m2。NUT 的营养知识得分更高。两组人的动机都是出于对动物福利和环境的关注,但 NUT 组还受到人际关系的影响,而 NHP 组则强调寻求健康益处。就读研究生营养学课程被视为一种工具,可以获得资源、人员和知识,从而支持他们的饮食决策。NUT 组更关注食品质量,选择未经加工的食品,而 NHP 组则更关注道德问题,倾向于从小生产者和当地企业购买食品。参与者的看法也受到他们的经验和知识的影响,非素食者认为素食本身更健康,而非素食者则将食品质量的提高归功于素食者对饮食选择的细心关注。我们的研究结果表明,虽然这两个群体有着共同的动机,但他们对营养知识的不同了解程度似乎对他们坚持素食的经历有着重要影响,这凸显了寻求营养知识在支持可持续素食实践中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Dip increases eating rate and promotes greater intake even when energy density is reduced Meat alternative consumers still frowned upon in Europe: Analysis of stereotypical, emotional and behavioral responses of observing others The role of nutrition background on motivations, barriers, and adherence to a vegan diet: A qualitative study of the vegan eating habits and nutritional evaluation survey (VEGAN-EatS) Comparison of free-comment online product reviews and central location product testing for sensory product characterisation: A case study with coffee consumers Olfactory modulation of visual attention and preference towards congruent food products: An eye tracking study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1