The role of nutrition background on motivations, barriers, and adherence to a vegan diet: A qualitative study of the vegan eating habits and nutritional evaluation survey (VEGAN-EatS)
Martin Hindermann Santini , Heloísa C. Santo André , Bruna Caruso Mazzolani , Fabiana Infante Smaira , Gabriel Perri Esteves , Alice Erwig Leitão , Bruno Gualano , Hamilton Roschel
{"title":"The role of nutrition background on motivations, barriers, and adherence to a vegan diet: A qualitative study of the vegan eating habits and nutritional evaluation survey (VEGAN-EatS)","authors":"Martin Hindermann Santini , Heloísa C. Santo André , Bruna Caruso Mazzolani , Fabiana Infante Smaira , Gabriel Perri Esteves , Alice Erwig Leitão , Bruno Gualano , Hamilton Roschel","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to investigate the motivations, enablers, barriers and attitudes towards the vegan movement within people with distinct formal backgrounds in nutrition. To that end, a cross-sectional, qualitative study was conducted with two groups of vegan individuals: registered dietitians or undergraduate nutrition students (NUT) and non-health professionals (NHP). Participants filled out The General Knowledge on Nutrition Questionnaire and attended to focus groups, analyzed using MAXQDA software. Twenty individuals (NUT:7F,3M; NHP:9F,1M), with mean age of 32 ± 12 years, and 24 ± 4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> BMI were assessed. NUT presented a higher score of nutritional knowledge. Both groups were motivated by animal welfare and environmental concerns, although NUT group was also influenced by personal relationships, while NHP group highlighted seeking health benefits. Being enrolled in a graduate nutrition program was viewed as a tool to have access to resources, people and knowledge that supported their dietary decisions. NUT group demonstrated greater concern about food quality, choosing unprocessed foods, whilst NHP group demonstrated ethical concerns, preferring to consume from small producers and local businesses. Participant's perceptions were also influenced by their experiences and knowledge, with NHP believing that vegan diets are inherently healthier, while NUT attributed the improved food quality to vegans' careful attention to their dietary choices. Our findings suggest that while both groups share common motivations, their different depths of nutritional knowledge seem to have important impacts on their experience in adhering to a vegan diet, highlighting the critical role of seeking knowledge on nutrition in supporting sustainable vegan dietary practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 105378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002805","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the motivations, enablers, barriers and attitudes towards the vegan movement within people with distinct formal backgrounds in nutrition. To that end, a cross-sectional, qualitative study was conducted with two groups of vegan individuals: registered dietitians or undergraduate nutrition students (NUT) and non-health professionals (NHP). Participants filled out The General Knowledge on Nutrition Questionnaire and attended to focus groups, analyzed using MAXQDA software. Twenty individuals (NUT:7F,3M; NHP:9F,1M), with mean age of 32 ± 12 years, and 24 ± 4 kg/m2 BMI were assessed. NUT presented a higher score of nutritional knowledge. Both groups were motivated by animal welfare and environmental concerns, although NUT group was also influenced by personal relationships, while NHP group highlighted seeking health benefits. Being enrolled in a graduate nutrition program was viewed as a tool to have access to resources, people and knowledge that supported their dietary decisions. NUT group demonstrated greater concern about food quality, choosing unprocessed foods, whilst NHP group demonstrated ethical concerns, preferring to consume from small producers and local businesses. Participant's perceptions were also influenced by their experiences and knowledge, with NHP believing that vegan diets are inherently healthier, while NUT attributed the improved food quality to vegans' careful attention to their dietary choices. Our findings suggest that while both groups share common motivations, their different depths of nutritional knowledge seem to have important impacts on their experience in adhering to a vegan diet, highlighting the critical role of seeking knowledge on nutrition in supporting sustainable vegan dietary practices.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.