Comparison of the efficacy of carbonation and conventional curing for remediation of copper-contaminated soils by ladle slag

IF 7.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of CO2 Utilization Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102981
Bo Xu, Yaolin Yi
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of carbonation and conventional curing for remediation of copper-contaminated soils by ladle slag","authors":"Bo Xu,&nbsp;Yaolin Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil contamination poses an increasing challenge for global sustainable development. Traditional remediation methods, such as using ordinary Portland cement (OPC) for treating contaminated soils, are limited by high CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, significant energy consumption, and natural resource depletion. A sustainable approach utilizing steel production waste (ladle slag, LS) to efficiently remediate copper (Cu)-contaminated soils was proposed in this study. The efficacy of this remediation using carbonation and conventional curing methods was compared. Cu-contaminated soils, spiked with varying initial concentrations, were treated with 10 % LS and subjected to both conventional and carbonation curing for different durations. Leaching behavior, strength development, and chemical and mineral properties of LS-remediated Cu-contaminated soils were assessed. The results demonstrated that both CO<sub>2</sub> and conventional curing significantly reduced Cu leaching in contaminated soils by 4–5 orders of magnitude compared to untreated soils. CO<sub>2</sub> curing achieved these reductions in a shorter time (56–72 hours) than conventional curing (28–56 days). Additionally, CO<sub>2</sub> curing sequestered up to 8 % CO<sub>2</sub> in the soils. However, higher Cu concentrations hindered carbonation reactions, lowering CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration. While CO<sub>2</sub> curing improved soil strength, increased initial Cu concentration diminished this effect. During CO<sub>2</sub> curing, the formation of Ca- and Mg-carbonates contributed to microstructural densification and binding, thereby improving strength. These carbonates also encapsulated Cu, preventing its leaching. In contrast, the addition of Cu enhanced hydration reactions and improved the strength development of Cu-contaminated soils subjected to conventional curing. Conventional curing produced calcium aluminum silicate hydrate, which effectively bound soil particles, filled pores, and encapsulated Cu, reducing its leaching.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of CO2 Utilization","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 102981"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of CO2 Utilization","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212982024003160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil contamination poses an increasing challenge for global sustainable development. Traditional remediation methods, such as using ordinary Portland cement (OPC) for treating contaminated soils, are limited by high CO2 emissions, significant energy consumption, and natural resource depletion. A sustainable approach utilizing steel production waste (ladle slag, LS) to efficiently remediate copper (Cu)-contaminated soils was proposed in this study. The efficacy of this remediation using carbonation and conventional curing methods was compared. Cu-contaminated soils, spiked with varying initial concentrations, were treated with 10 % LS and subjected to both conventional and carbonation curing for different durations. Leaching behavior, strength development, and chemical and mineral properties of LS-remediated Cu-contaminated soils were assessed. The results demonstrated that both CO2 and conventional curing significantly reduced Cu leaching in contaminated soils by 4–5 orders of magnitude compared to untreated soils. CO2 curing achieved these reductions in a shorter time (56–72 hours) than conventional curing (28–56 days). Additionally, CO2 curing sequestered up to 8 % CO2 in the soils. However, higher Cu concentrations hindered carbonation reactions, lowering CO2 sequestration. While CO2 curing improved soil strength, increased initial Cu concentration diminished this effect. During CO2 curing, the formation of Ca- and Mg-carbonates contributed to microstructural densification and binding, thereby improving strength. These carbonates also encapsulated Cu, preventing its leaching. In contrast, the addition of Cu enhanced hydration reactions and improved the strength development of Cu-contaminated soils subjected to conventional curing. Conventional curing produced calcium aluminum silicate hydrate, which effectively bound soil particles, filled pores, and encapsulated Cu, reducing its leaching.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较碳化法和传统固化法对钢包炉渣铜污染土壤的修复效果
土壤污染对全球可持续发展构成了日益严峻的挑战。传统的修复方法,如使用普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)处理受污染的土壤,受到二氧化碳排放量高、能源消耗大和自然资源枯竭的限制。本研究提出了一种利用钢铁生产废料(钢包渣)有效修复铜(Cu)污染土壤的可持续方法。研究比较了碳化法和传统固化法的修复效果。在不同初始浓度的铜污染土壤中添加了 10% 的 LS,并对其进行了不同持续时间的传统固化和碳化固化。对经 LS 修复的铜污染土壤的浸出行为、强度发展以及化学和矿物特性进行了评估。结果表明,与未经处理的土壤相比,二氧化碳固化和传统固化都能显著减少受污染土壤中的铜沥滤,减少幅度达 4-5 个数量级。与传统固化法(28-56 天)相比,二氧化碳固化法能在更短的时间内(56-72 小时)实现上述减少效果。此外,二氧化碳固化还在土壤中封存了高达 8% 的二氧化碳。然而,较高的铜浓度会阻碍碳化反应,从而降低二氧化碳的封存。虽然二氧化碳固化能提高土壤强度,但初始铜浓度的增加会降低这种效果。在二氧化碳固化过程中,Ca 和 Mg 碳酸盐的形成促进了微结构的致密化和结合,从而提高了强度。这些碳酸盐还能包裹铜,防止其沥滤。与此相反,添加 Cu 可增强水化反应,改善传统固化的铜污染土壤的强度发展。传统固化会产生硅酸铝钙水合物,它能有效地结合土壤颗粒、填充孔隙并包裹铜,从而减少铜的沥出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Journal of CO2 Utilization CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
10.40%
发文量
406
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of CO2 Utilization offers a single, multi-disciplinary, scholarly platform for the exchange of novel research in the field of CO2 re-use for scientists and engineers in chemicals, fuels and materials. The emphasis is on the dissemination of leading-edge research from basic science to the development of new processes, technologies and applications. The Journal of CO2 Utilization publishes original peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, and short communications, including experimental and theoretical work, and analytical models and simulations.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of mechanical properties and hydration of low-carbon magnesium and calcium-rich waste powder geopolymer paste Comparison of the efficacy of carbonation and conventional curing for remediation of copper-contaminated soils by ladle slag Fibrous phosphosilicate with highly dispersed poly(ionic liquids) as a nanocatalyst for production of biopolymer from limonene epoxide and CO2 Unraveling the role of EPOC during the enhancement of RWGS reaction in a Pt/YSZ/Au single chamber reactor Formation of bio-based cyclic carbonates from CO2 and renewable feedstocks via porous poly(azomethine) -based heterogeneous catalysts approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1