Mapping transboundary ecological networks for conservation in the Altai Mountains

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112869
Jiali Han , Fang Han , Alexander Dunets , Bayarkhuu Batbayar
{"title":"Mapping transboundary ecological networks for conservation in the Altai Mountains","authors":"Jiali Han ,&nbsp;Fang Han ,&nbsp;Alexander Dunets ,&nbsp;Bayarkhuu Batbayar","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Altai Mountains, spanning China, Russia, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia, are crucial habitats for many endemic, rare, and endangered species and are a vital migration corridor. However, the standards for establishing protected areas (PAs) differ among the four countries, resulting in suboptimal spatial arrangements and protection gaps in PAs. Therefore, here, by integrating the habitats of rare and endangered species and key ecosystem service areas, we identified potential conservation areas in the Altai Mountains. And we overlaid them with existing PAs in China, Russia, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia to determine the core habitats of the transboundary ecological networks for conservation. The identified core habitats covered 168,729.00 km<sup>2</sup>, representing 50.63 % of the Altai Mountains. Among these, potential conservation area not covered by existing PAs was approximately 82,833.50 km<sup>2</sup> (24.86%). Additionally, 116 ecological corridors were identified with an average length of 38.15 km, including 8 transboundary corridors that connect the core conservation areas across different countries. Based on these findings, new PAs and other effective conservation measures (OECMs) in the Altai Mountains were proposed, along with a phased cooperation framework to gradually enhance the construction of transboundary ecological networks for conservation. Establishing the Altai Mountains’ transboundary ecological networks for conservation has the potential to become a model for transboundary conservation projects, providing valuable insights and guidance for developing conservation and collaborative management strategies in other transboundary regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112869"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Altai Mountains, spanning China, Russia, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia, are crucial habitats for many endemic, rare, and endangered species and are a vital migration corridor. However, the standards for establishing protected areas (PAs) differ among the four countries, resulting in suboptimal spatial arrangements and protection gaps in PAs. Therefore, here, by integrating the habitats of rare and endangered species and key ecosystem service areas, we identified potential conservation areas in the Altai Mountains. And we overlaid them with existing PAs in China, Russia, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia to determine the core habitats of the transboundary ecological networks for conservation. The identified core habitats covered 168,729.00 km2, representing 50.63 % of the Altai Mountains. Among these, potential conservation area not covered by existing PAs was approximately 82,833.50 km2 (24.86%). Additionally, 116 ecological corridors were identified with an average length of 38.15 km, including 8 transboundary corridors that connect the core conservation areas across different countries. Based on these findings, new PAs and other effective conservation measures (OECMs) in the Altai Mountains were proposed, along with a phased cooperation framework to gradually enhance the construction of transboundary ecological networks for conservation. Establishing the Altai Mountains’ transboundary ecological networks for conservation has the potential to become a model for transboundary conservation projects, providing valuable insights and guidance for developing conservation and collaborative management strategies in other transboundary regions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制阿尔泰山跨境生态保护网络图
阿尔泰山横跨中国、俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦和蒙古,是许多特有、稀有和濒危物种的重要栖息地,也是重要的迁徙通道。然而,四个国家建立保护区的标准不尽相同,导致保护区的空间布局不尽合理,存在保护空白。因此,在这里,通过整合珍稀濒危物种栖息地和关键生态系统服务区,我们确定了阿尔泰山的潜在保护区。并将其与中国、俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦和蒙古的现有保护区进行重叠,以确定跨境生态网络的核心保护栖息地。确定的核心栖息地面积为 168,729.00 平方公里,占阿尔泰山的 50.63%。其中,现有保护区未覆盖的潜在保护区面积约为 82,833.50 平方公里(24.86%)。此外,还确定了 116 条生态走廊,平均长度为 38.15 公里,其中包括 8 条连接不同国家核心保护区的跨境走廊。根据这些研究结果,提出了在阿尔泰山新建保护区和采取其他有效保护措施(OECM)的建议,以及逐步加强跨境生态保护网络建设的分阶段合作框架。建立阿尔泰山跨境生态保护网络有可能成为跨境保护项目的典范,为其他跨境地区制定保护和合作管理战略提供宝贵的见解和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Improving ecosystem respiration estimates for CO2 flux partitioning by discriminating water and temperature controls on above- and below-ground sources Evaluating the performance of spectral indices and meteorological variables as indicators of live fuel moisture content in Mediterranean shrublands Importance of the interplay between land cover and topography in modeling habitat selection Inequity in accessibility to urban parks in environmental gentrification areas based on Multi-G3SFCA: A case study of Wuhan’s main urban districts Comprehensive evaluation and scenario simulation for determining the optimal conservation priority of ecological services in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1