Enza Leone, Nachiappan Chockalingam, Robert Needham, Aoife Healy, Nicola Eddison, Nikola Jevtic, Vinay Jasani
{"title":"Development and Preliminary Testing of the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS): Content and Face Validity","authors":"Enza Leone, Nachiappan Chockalingam, Robert Needham, Aoife Healy, Nicola Eddison, Nikola Jevtic, Vinay Jasani","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a structural spinal deformity with implications for health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). The Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) questionnaire is the standard for HR-QoL assessment. However, studies have identified limitations with the SRS-22r, including content and face validity issues, reliability concerns, and language appropriateness. This study aimed to develop and validate a patient-reported questionnaire, the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS), to assess the impact of AIS on HR-QoL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The SQ-AIS comprises six domains: general health, pain, function/activity, self-image/appearance, mental health, and intervention. Individuals with AIS aged 10–19 years and clinicians from a range of countries with expertise in AIS contributed to the testing process. Face validity and clinical applicability were assessed using Likert scales, while content validity was evaluated through a categorical binary variable (yes/no).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Involving 8 AIS patients and 43 clinicians, face validity scores demonstrated an acceptable level of understanding (≥ 4/5) for both individuals with AIS and clinicians. Most individuals with AIS (85.71%) and clinicians (80.95%) affirmed that the questionnaire sufficiently covers various aspects of scoliosis, indicating a satisfactory level of content validity. Ratings for applicability to clinical practice indicated an acceptable level of practical relevance (≥ 4/5).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The SQ-AIS emerges as a valid and promising tool to overcome existing challenges in AIS-related outcome assessment. Pending further validation studies, the favorable reception from the international community of clinicians suggests its potential as a new benchmark for evaluating AIS impact on HR-QoL and monitoring scoliosis management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"7 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70213","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a structural spinal deformity with implications for health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). The Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) questionnaire is the standard for HR-QoL assessment. However, studies have identified limitations with the SRS-22r, including content and face validity issues, reliability concerns, and language appropriateness. This study aimed to develop and validate a patient-reported questionnaire, the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS), to assess the impact of AIS on HR-QoL.
Methods
The SQ-AIS comprises six domains: general health, pain, function/activity, self-image/appearance, mental health, and intervention. Individuals with AIS aged 10–19 years and clinicians from a range of countries with expertise in AIS contributed to the testing process. Face validity and clinical applicability were assessed using Likert scales, while content validity was evaluated through a categorical binary variable (yes/no).
Results
Involving 8 AIS patients and 43 clinicians, face validity scores demonstrated an acceptable level of understanding (≥ 4/5) for both individuals with AIS and clinicians. Most individuals with AIS (85.71%) and clinicians (80.95%) affirmed that the questionnaire sufficiently covers various aspects of scoliosis, indicating a satisfactory level of content validity. Ratings for applicability to clinical practice indicated an acceptable level of practical relevance (≥ 4/5).
Discussion and Conclusion
The SQ-AIS emerges as a valid and promising tool to overcome existing challenges in AIS-related outcome assessment. Pending further validation studies, the favorable reception from the international community of clinicians suggests its potential as a new benchmark for evaluating AIS impact on HR-QoL and monitoring scoliosis management.