Is Mansplaining Gendered? The Effects of Unsolicited, Generic, and Prescriptive Advice on U.S. Women.

IF 4.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1177/09567976241268630
Erik Santoro, Hazel Rose Markus
{"title":"Is Mansplaining Gendered? The Effects of Unsolicited, Generic, and Prescriptive Advice on U.S. Women.","authors":"Erik Santoro, Hazel Rose Markus","doi":"10.1177/09567976241268630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In light of popular accounts in the United States of \"mansplaining,\" we investigated the effects on women when others give them \"unresponsive\" advice (i.e., unsolicited, generic, and prescriptive recommendations). We show using both vignettes (Study 1) and live interactions (Study 2) that unresponsive advice (vs. responsive questions) from men negatively affected women's self-perceptions, leaving them feeling less respected, powerful, and trusting and having a smaller size of self. The advice giver's gender did not moderate these self-perception outcomes (Study 3), although women anticipated greater stereotype threat only when men, and not when women, gave them unresponsive advice. Similar effects were found using responsive advice instead of questions as the comparison condition (Study 4). Overall, these findings (<i>N</i> = 4,394 U.S. adult women) suggest that it is the unresponsive nature of advice-and for certain outcomes the advice giver's gender-that explain its effects on women. They point to the value of a responsive suggestion or question during conversations, particularly during cross-gender ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":20745,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":"1395-1415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976241268630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In light of popular accounts in the United States of "mansplaining," we investigated the effects on women when others give them "unresponsive" advice (i.e., unsolicited, generic, and prescriptive recommendations). We show using both vignettes (Study 1) and live interactions (Study 2) that unresponsive advice (vs. responsive questions) from men negatively affected women's self-perceptions, leaving them feeling less respected, powerful, and trusting and having a smaller size of self. The advice giver's gender did not moderate these self-perception outcomes (Study 3), although women anticipated greater stereotype threat only when men, and not when women, gave them unresponsive advice. Similar effects were found using responsive advice instead of questions as the comparison condition (Study 4). Overall, these findings (N = 4,394 U.S. adult women) suggest that it is the unresponsive nature of advice-and for certain outcomes the advice giver's gender-that explain its effects on women. They point to the value of a responsive suggestion or question during conversations, particularly during cross-gender ones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男人的抱怨有性别倾向吗?未经请求的通用性和指令性建议对美国女性的影响》。
鉴于美国流行的 "男人抱怨 "的说法,我们调查了当他人给女性提供 "无回应 "建议(即未经请求的、通用的和指令性的建议)时对女性的影响。我们通过小故事(研究 1)和现场互动(研究 2)表明,来自男性的无回应建议(相对于有回应的问题)会对女性的自我认知产生负面影响,让她们感觉自己更不被尊重、更没有力量、更不被信任,自我规模也更小。虽然只有当男性而非女性向女性提供无回应的建议时,女性才会预期到更大的刻板印象威胁,但建议提供者的性别并没有调节这些自我认知结果(研究 3)。使用有回应的建议而不是问题作为对比条件,也发现了类似的效果(研究 4)。总之,这些研究结果(N = 4,394 名美国成年女性)表明,正是建议的无反应性--以及在某些结果中建议者的性别--解释了建议对女性的影响。他们指出,在对话中,尤其是在跨性别对话中,有反应的建议或问题很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Science
Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Psychological Science, the flagship journal of The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society), is a leading publication in the field with a citation ranking/impact factor among the top ten worldwide. It publishes authoritative articles covering various domains of psychological science, including brain and behavior, clinical science, cognition, learning and memory, social psychology, and developmental psychology. In addition to full-length articles, the journal features summaries of new research developments and discussions on psychological issues in government and public affairs. "Psychological Science" is published twelve times annually.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the Role of Teams and Training in Geopolitical Forecasting: The Effect of Uncontrolled Method Variance on Statistical Conclusions. Gaze Behavior Reveals Expectations of Potential Scene Changes. Why Do Children Think Words Are Mutually Exclusive? The Affect Misattribution Procedure Revisited: An Informational Account. Narrative Identity, Traits, and Trajectories of Depression and Well-Being: A 9-Year Longitudinal Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1