The safety and efficacy of primary duct closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-02034-8
Yang Liao, Fei Liu, Xiaozhou Zhang, Nan Yang
{"title":"The safety and efficacy of primary duct closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yang Liao, Fei Liu, Xiaozhou Zhang, Nan Yang","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-02034-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary duct closure (LCBDE + PDC) has been considered a feasible and safe treatment for cholecystocholedocholithiasis, uncertainties remain regarding its effectiveness and safety in patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of LCBDE + PDC specifically in patients with mild-to-moderate acute cholangitis (AC). Patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis who underwent LCBDE + PDC treatment at our hospital between July 2020 and September 2022 were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of cholangitis: acute cholangitis (AC group) and non-acute cholangitis (non-AC group). A total of 136 patients underwent LCBDE + PDC treatment, with 65 in the AC group and 71 in the non-AC group. No deaths occurred after surgery in either group. The AC group had longer drainage tube retention time (5 (4-7) days vs. 4 (3-5) days, P < 0.001), postoperative hospital stay (8 (6-9) days vs. 6 (5-7) days, P < 0.001), and total hospital stay (12 (9.5-15) days vs. 10 (8-13) days, P < 0.001) compared to the non-AC group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, estimated blood loss, and the rate of using holmium laser lithotripsy. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the two groups. Our study demonstrates that LCBDE + PDC is a safe and feasible treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis who meet the criteria for primary duct closure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02034-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary duct closure (LCBDE + PDC) has been considered a feasible and safe treatment for cholecystocholedocholithiasis, uncertainties remain regarding its effectiveness and safety in patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of LCBDE + PDC specifically in patients with mild-to-moderate acute cholangitis (AC). Patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis who underwent LCBDE + PDC treatment at our hospital between July 2020 and September 2022 were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of cholangitis: acute cholangitis (AC group) and non-acute cholangitis (non-AC group). A total of 136 patients underwent LCBDE + PDC treatment, with 65 in the AC group and 71 in the non-AC group. No deaths occurred after surgery in either group. The AC group had longer drainage tube retention time (5 (4-7) days vs. 4 (3-5) days, P < 0.001), postoperative hospital stay (8 (6-9) days vs. 6 (5-7) days, P < 0.001), and total hospital stay (12 (9.5-15) days vs. 10 (8-13) days, P < 0.001) compared to the non-AC group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, estimated blood loss, and the rate of using holmium laser lithotripsy. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the two groups. Our study demonstrates that LCBDE + PDC is a safe and feasible treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis who meet the criteria for primary duct closure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻中度结石相关性急性胆管炎患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术后原发性胆管闭合的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
虽然腹腔镜胆总管探查加原发性胆管闭合术(LCBDE + PDC)被认为是治疗胆囊胆管结石的一种可行且安全的方法,但其在轻中度结石相关性急性胆管炎患者中的有效性和安全性仍存在不确定性。因此,本研究旨在探讨 LCBDE + PDC 对轻度至中度急性胆管炎(AC)患者的安全性和有效性。研究纳入了 2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 9 月期间在我院接受 LCBDE + PDC 治疗的胆囊胆管结石患者。根据是否存在胆管炎将患者分为两组:急性胆管炎组(AC 组)和非急性胆管炎组(非 AC 组)。共有 136 名患者接受了 LCBDE + PDC 治疗,其中急性胆管炎组 65 人,非急性胆管炎组 71 人。两组患者术后均无死亡病例。AC 组的引流管保留时间更长(5(4-7)天 vs. 4(3-5)天,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
期刊最新文献
Single-incision gasless trans-subclavian endoscopic approach thyroidectomy. Type 2 diabetes mellitus remission following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and hindgut-based procedure: a retrospective multicenter study. Pancreatic cancer and long survivors: a survey of Italian society of oncological surgery (SICO). The safety and efficacy of primary duct closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study. Role of sleeve gastrectomy in improving metabolic syndrome: an overview.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1