Performance of optically pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography: validation in large samples and multiple tasks.

Xiongfei Wang, Pengfei Teng, Qiujian Meng, Yuying Jiang, Jiangfen Wu, Tianfu Li, Mengyang Wang, Yuguang Guan, Jian Zhou, Jingwei Sheng, Jia-Hong Gao, Guoming Luan
{"title":"Performance of optically pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography: validation in large samples and multiple tasks.","authors":"Xiongfei Wang, Pengfei Teng, Qiujian Meng, Yuying Jiang, Jiangfen Wu, Tianfu Li, Mengyang Wang, Yuguang Guan, Jian Zhou, Jingwei Sheng, Jia-Hong Gao, Guoming Luan","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad9680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective&#xD;Current commercial magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems detect neuro-magnetic signals using superconducting quantum interferometers devices (SQUIDs), which require liquid helium as cryogen and have many limitations during operation. In contrast, optical pumped magnetometers (OPMs) technology provides a promising alternative to conventional SQUID-MEG. OPMs can operate at room temperature, offering benefits such as flexible deployment and lower costs. However, the validation of OPM-MEG has primarily been conducted on small sample sizes and specific regions of interest in the brain, lacking comprehensive validation for larger sample sizes and assessment of whole-brain. &#xD;Approach&#xD;We recruited 100 participants, including healthy and neurological disorders individuals. Whole-brain OPM-MEG and SQUID-MEG data were recorded sequentially during auditory (n = 50) and visual (n = 50) stimulation experiments. By comparing the task-evoked responses of the two systems, we aimed to validate the performance of the next-generation OPM-MEG. &#xD;Main results&#xD;The results showed that OPM-MEG enhanced the amplitude of task-related responses and exhibited similar magnetic field patterns and neural oscillatory activity as SQUID-MEG. There was no difference in the task-related latencies measured by the two systems. The signal-to-noise ratio was lower for the OPM-MEG in the auditory experiment, but did not differ in the visual experiment, suggesting that the results may be task-dependent. &#xD;Significance&#xD;These results demonstrate that OPM-MEG, as an alternative to traditional SQUID-MEG, shows superior response amplitude and comparable performance in capturing brain dynamics. This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of OPM-MEG as a next-generation neuroimaging technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad9680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Current commercial magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems detect neuro-magnetic signals using superconducting quantum interferometers devices (SQUIDs), which require liquid helium as cryogen and have many limitations during operation. In contrast, optical pumped magnetometers (OPMs) technology provides a promising alternative to conventional SQUID-MEG. OPMs can operate at room temperature, offering benefits such as flexible deployment and lower costs. However, the validation of OPM-MEG has primarily been conducted on small sample sizes and specific regions of interest in the brain, lacking comprehensive validation for larger sample sizes and assessment of whole-brain. Approach We recruited 100 participants, including healthy and neurological disorders individuals. Whole-brain OPM-MEG and SQUID-MEG data were recorded sequentially during auditory (n = 50) and visual (n = 50) stimulation experiments. By comparing the task-evoked responses of the two systems, we aimed to validate the performance of the next-generation OPM-MEG. Main results The results showed that OPM-MEG enhanced the amplitude of task-related responses and exhibited similar magnetic field patterns and neural oscillatory activity as SQUID-MEG. There was no difference in the task-related latencies measured by the two systems. The signal-to-noise ratio was lower for the OPM-MEG in the auditory experiment, but did not differ in the visual experiment, suggesting that the results may be task-dependent. Significance These results demonstrate that OPM-MEG, as an alternative to traditional SQUID-MEG, shows superior response amplitude and comparable performance in capturing brain dynamics. This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of OPM-MEG as a next-generation neuroimaging technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光泵磁强计脑磁图的性能:大样本和多重任务的验证。
目标 目前的商用脑磁图(MEG)系统使用超导量子干涉仪(SQUID)设备检测神经磁信号,这种设备需要液氦作为低温,在运行过程中存在许多限制。相比之下,光泵浦磁强计(OPMs)技术为传统的 SQUID-MEG 提供了一个前景广阔的替代方案。OPM 可在室温下运行,具有部署灵活、成本较低等优点。然而,OPM-MEG 的验证主要是在小样本量和大脑特定感兴趣区域进行的,缺乏对更大样本量和全脑评估的全面验证。在听觉(50 人)和视觉(50 人)刺激实验中依次记录全脑 OPM-MEG 和 SQUID-MEG 数据。 主要结果 结果表明,OPM-MEG 增强了任务相关反应的振幅,并表现出与 SQUID-MEG 相似的磁场模式和神经振荡活动。两种系统测得的任务相关潜伏期没有差异。在听觉实验中,OPM-MEG 的信噪比较低,但在视觉实验中并无差异,这表明实验结果可能与任务有关。这项研究为 OPM-MEG 作为下一代神经成像技术的有效性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of cross-patient approaches for EEG epileptic seizure prediction. Identification of autism spectrum disorder using electroencephalography and machine learning: a review. Performance of optically pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography: validation in large samples and multiple tasks. A 10-year journey towards clinical translation of an implantable endovascular BCI A keynote lecture given at the BCI society meeting in Brussels. Attention demands modulate brain electrical microstates and mental fatigue induced by simulated flight tasks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1