Effects of Surgery on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Delirium in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S493917
Yongfeng Fan, Xiulun Liu, Zhongkui Li, Daokang Xiang
{"title":"Effects of Surgery on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Delirium in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Yongfeng Fan, Xiulun Liu, Zhongkui Li, Daokang Xiang","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S493917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of surgical intervention on hemodynamic parameters and postoperative delirium in Stanford Type A aortic dissection patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 139 patients who underwent surgery for Stanford Type A aortic dissection from February 2022 to February 2024. Hemodynamic parameters, including maximum ascending aortic diameter (MAAD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), and ejection fraction (LVEF), were compared pre- and post-surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on delirium occurrence postoperatively: Group A (n=49, with delirium) and Group B (n=90, without delirium). Differences in surgical factors and intensive care conditions were analyzed, and risk factors for postoperative delirium were identified. Group sizes differ due to retrospective categorization based on observed outcomes rather than controlled sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>① Hemodynamic parameters: Postoperative MAAD and LVEDd were significantly reduced, while LVEF increased compared to preoperative levels (P < 0.05). ② Surgical and postoperative conditions: Group A had longer surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest times than Group B (P < 0.05). ③ Univariate analysis of baseline data: Group A had higher rates of patients aged ≥60, hypertension, history of stroke, and elevated preoperative D-dimer levels (P < 0.05). ④ Multivariate logistic analysis: Independent risk factors for postoperative delirium included age ≥60, hypertension, history of stroke, surgery time >6 hours, cardiopulmonary bypass time >3 hours, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time >40 minutes (OR > 1, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical treatment of Stanford Type A aortic dissection has a good effect, significantly improving long-term cardiac function. However, the incidence of postoperative delirium is relatively high and is closely related to factors such as age, hypertension, history of stroke, surgery time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"17 ","pages":"5353-5362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S493917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of surgical intervention on hemodynamic parameters and postoperative delirium in Stanford Type A aortic dissection patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 139 patients who underwent surgery for Stanford Type A aortic dissection from February 2022 to February 2024. Hemodynamic parameters, including maximum ascending aortic diameter (MAAD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), and ejection fraction (LVEF), were compared pre- and post-surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on delirium occurrence postoperatively: Group A (n=49, with delirium) and Group B (n=90, without delirium). Differences in surgical factors and intensive care conditions were analyzed, and risk factors for postoperative delirium were identified. Group sizes differ due to retrospective categorization based on observed outcomes rather than controlled sampling.

Results: ① Hemodynamic parameters: Postoperative MAAD and LVEDd were significantly reduced, while LVEF increased compared to preoperative levels (P < 0.05). ② Surgical and postoperative conditions: Group A had longer surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest times than Group B (P < 0.05). ③ Univariate analysis of baseline data: Group A had higher rates of patients aged ≥60, hypertension, history of stroke, and elevated preoperative D-dimer levels (P < 0.05). ④ Multivariate logistic analysis: Independent risk factors for postoperative delirium included age ≥60, hypertension, history of stroke, surgery time >6 hours, cardiopulmonary bypass time >3 hours, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time >40 minutes (OR > 1, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Surgical treatment of Stanford Type A aortic dissection has a good effect, significantly improving long-term cardiac function. However, the incidence of postoperative delirium is relatively high and is closely related to factors such as age, hypertension, history of stroke, surgery time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的研究手术干预对斯坦福A型主动脉夹层患者血流动力学参数和术后谵妄的影响:方法:对2022年2月至2024年2月期间接受斯坦福A型主动脉夹层手术的139例患者进行回顾性分析。比较了手术前后的血流动力学参数,包括升主动脉最大直径(MAAD)、左室舒张末期直径(LVEDd)和射血分数(LVEF)。根据术后谵妄发生情况将患者分为两组:A组(49人,有谵妄)和B组(90人,无谵妄)。分析了手术因素和重症监护条件的差异,并确定了术后谵妄的风险因素。由于是根据观察结果而不是对照抽样进行的回顾性分类,各组人数有所不同:血液动力学参数:与术前水平相比,术后 MAAD 和 LVEDd 显著降低,而 LVEF 增加(P < 0.05)。手术和术后情况:与 B 组相比,A 组的手术时间、心肺旁路时间和深低温循环停止时间更长(P < 0.05)。③ 基线数据的单变量分析:A 组患者中年龄≥60 岁、高血压、中风病史和术前 D-二聚体水平升高的比例更高(P < 0.05)。④ 多变量逻辑分析:术后谵妄的独立危险因素包括年龄≥60岁、高血压、中风病史、手术时间>6小时、心肺旁路时间>3小时、深低温循环停止时间>40分钟(OR>1,P<0.05):结论:手术治疗斯坦福A型主动脉夹层效果良好,可显著改善远期心功能。结论:斯坦福A型主动脉夹层手术治疗效果良好,能明显改善远期心功能,但术后谵妄的发生率相对较高,且与年龄、高血压、中风病史、手术时间、心肺旁路时间、深低温循环停止时间等因素密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
期刊最新文献
Identification of a Missense Mutation in the FLNC Gene from a Chinese Family with Restrictive Cardiomyopathy. Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial: Evaluating the Impact of Acupuncture on Menstrual Regulation and Pregnancy Enhancement in Patients with DOR Using Rs-fMRI to Assess Brain Functional Networks. Improved Technique Reduce Lower Limb Complications After the Traditional No-Touch Technique for Vein Graft Harvesting: A Single-Center Retrospective Historical Controlled Study. Research Hotspots and Frontiers of Patient Delay: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2023. Effects of Surgery on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Delirium in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1