An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Statistical Methods in Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1177/09622802241298706
Xingyun Cao, Weizhen Wang, Tianfa Xie
{"title":"An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions.","authors":"Xingyun Cao, Weizhen Wang, Tianfa Xie","doi":"10.1177/09622802241298706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The difference between two proportions is the most important parameter in comparing two treatments based on independent two binomials and has garnered widespread application across various fields, particularly in clinical trials. There exists significant interest in devising optimal confidence intervals for the difference. Approximate intervals relying on asymptotic normality may lack reliability, thus calling for enhancements in exact confidence interval construction to bolster reliability and precision. In this paper, we present a novel approach that leverages the most probable test statistic and employs the <math><mi>h</mi></math>-function method to construct an optimal exact interval for the difference. We juxtapose the proposed interval against other exact intervals established through methodologies such as the Agresti-Min exact unconditional method, the Wang method, the fiducial method, and the hybrid score method. Our comparative analysis, employing the infimum coverage probability and total interval length as evaluation metrics, underscores the uniformly superior performance of the proposed interval. Additionally, we elucidate the application of these exact intervals using two real datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"9622802241298706"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241298706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The difference between two proportions is the most important parameter in comparing two treatments based on independent two binomials and has garnered widespread application across various fields, particularly in clinical trials. There exists significant interest in devising optimal confidence intervals for the difference. Approximate intervals relying on asymptotic normality may lack reliability, thus calling for enhancements in exact confidence interval construction to bolster reliability and precision. In this paper, we present a novel approach that leverages the most probable test statistic and employs the h-function method to construct an optimal exact interval for the difference. We juxtapose the proposed interval against other exact intervals established through methodologies such as the Agresti-Min exact unconditional method, the Wang method, the fiducial method, and the hybrid score method. Our comparative analysis, employing the infimum coverage probability and total interval length as evaluation metrics, underscores the uniformly superior performance of the proposed interval. Additionally, we elucidate the application of these exact intervals using two real datasets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个比例之间的差值是比较基于独立二项式的两种治疗方法时最重要的参数,已在各个领域得到广泛应用,尤其是在临床试验中。人们对为差值设计最佳置信区间非常感兴趣。依赖于渐近正态性的近似区间可能缺乏可靠性,因此需要改进精确置信区间的构建,以提高可靠性和精确性。在本文中,我们提出了一种新方法,利用最可能的检验统计量,并采用 h 函数方法来构建差值的最优精确区间。我们将提出的区间与通过 Agresti-Min 精确无条件法、Wang 法、fiducial 法和混合分数法等方法建立的其他精确区间进行比较。我们采用下限覆盖概率和区间总长度作为评价指标进行比较分析,结果表明所提区间具有一致的优越性能。此外,我们还利用两个真实数据集阐明了这些精确区间的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions. Covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs for semiparametric survival models. Model-based optimal randomization procedure for treatment-covariate interaction tests. LASSO-type instrumental variable selection methods with an application to Mendelian randomization. Estimating an adjusted risk difference in a cluster randomized trial with individual-level analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1