Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2432921
Felipe Retamal-Walter, Monique Waite, Nerina Scarinci
{"title":"Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention.","authors":"Felipe Retamal-Walter, Monique Waite, Nerina Scarinci","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2432921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate an evidence-based observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention (EI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Engagement in Telepractice Observational Tool (eTOT) was developed based on a previous e-Delphi study. Two independent raters used a set of 50 items to score 45 videorecorded telepractice EI sessions with young children with communication difficulties and their family. Principal component analysis (PCA) and reliability measures were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA identified six key components related to the measurement of engagement in telepractice. The components representing professional behaviours were (1) interacting directly with the parent; (2) getting to know the child and family to keep them motivated; (3) maximising the telepractice environment; and (4) demonstrating and practising the parent's role as agent of therapy. The two remaining components represented family behaviours: (5) parent interacting and supporting their child; and (6) family collaborating directly with the professional. The eTOT was found to have good reliability (α = .86), with very good test-retest and inter-rater reliability scores (κ<sub>w</sub> = .85 and .94 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is preliminary evidence that the eTOT is a valid and reliable tool to measure engagement during telepractice EI. The eTOT can be used as a self-reflection tool to identify and provide engagement-building opportunities in family-centred telepractice EI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2432921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate an evidence-based observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention (EI).

Materials and methods: The Engagement in Telepractice Observational Tool (eTOT) was developed based on a previous e-Delphi study. Two independent raters used a set of 50 items to score 45 videorecorded telepractice EI sessions with young children with communication difficulties and their family. Principal component analysis (PCA) and reliability measures were conducted.

Results: PCA identified six key components related to the measurement of engagement in telepractice. The components representing professional behaviours were (1) interacting directly with the parent; (2) getting to know the child and family to keep them motivated; (3) maximising the telepractice environment; and (4) demonstrating and practising the parent's role as agent of therapy. The two remaining components represented family behaviours: (5) parent interacting and supporting their child; and (6) family collaborating directly with the professional. The eTOT was found to have good reliability (α = .86), with very good test-retest and inter-rater reliability scores (κw = .85 and .94 respectively).

Conclusion: There is preliminary evidence that the eTOT is a valid and reliable tool to measure engagement during telepractice EI. The eTOT can be used as a self-reflection tool to identify and provide engagement-building opportunities in family-centred telepractice EI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证用于衡量远程实践早期干预参与度的观察工具。
目的:开发并验证一种以证据为基础的观察工具,用于衡量远程实践早期干预(EI)的参与情况:参与远程实践观察工具(eTOT)是根据之前的一项电子德尔菲研究开发的。两名独立评分员使用一组 50 个项目对 45 个与有沟通障碍的幼儿及其家人进行的远程实践早期干预课程录像进行评分。进行了主成分分析(PCA)和可靠性测量:主成分分析确定了与远程实践参与度测量相关的六个关键成分。代表专业行为的成分是:(1)直接与家长互动;(2)了解儿童和家庭,以保持他们的积极性;(3)最大限度地利用远程实践环境;以及(4)展示和实践家长作为治疗代理人的角色。其余两个组成部分代表了家庭行为:(5) 家长与孩子的互动和支持;(6) 家庭与专业人员的直接合作。研究发现,eTOT 具有良好的信度(α = .86),测试-重复和评分者之间的信度也非常好(κw = .85 和 .94):有初步证据表明,eTOT 是一种有效、可靠的工具,可用于测量远程教学中的参与度。eTOT 可作为一种自我反思工具,用于在以家庭为中心的远程实践电子病历中识别和提供参与机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal associations between stroke-related neurologic deficits and course of basic activities of daily living up to six months after stroke. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain severity scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Spanish version of the King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale (KPPS). Understanding recovery of people recovering from COVID-19 receiving treatment from primary care allied health professionals: a mixed-methods study. The effectiveness of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes pre and post upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1