Valentina Hrtonova , Petr Nejedly , Vojtech Travnicek , Jan Cimbalnik , Barbora Matouskova , Martin Pail , Laure Peter-Derex , Christophe Grova , Jean Gotman , Josef Halamek , Pavel Jurak , Milan Brazdil , Petr Klimes , Birgit Frauscher
{"title":"Metrics for evaluation of automatic epileptogenic zone localization in intracranial electrophysiology","authors":"Valentina Hrtonova , Petr Nejedly , Vojtech Travnicek , Jan Cimbalnik , Barbora Matouskova , Martin Pail , Laure Peter-Derex , Christophe Grova , Jean Gotman , Josef Halamek , Pavel Jurak , Milan Brazdil , Petr Klimes , Birgit Frauscher","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Precise localization of the epileptogenic zone is critical for successful epilepsy surgery. However, imbalanced datasets in terms of epileptic vs. normal electrode contacts and a lack of standardized evaluation guidelines hinder the consistent evaluation of automatic machine learning localization models.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study addresses these challenges by analyzing class imbalance in clinical datasets and evaluating common assessment metrics. Data from 139 drug-resistant epilepsy patients across two Institutions were analyzed. Metric behaviors were examined using clinical and simulated data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Complementary use of Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) provides an optimal evaluation approach. This must be paired with an analysis of class imbalance and its impact due to significant variations found in clinical datasets.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proposed framework offers a comprehensive and reliable method for evaluating machine learning models in epileptogenic zone localization, improving their precision and clinical relevance.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Adopting this framework will improve the comparability and multicenter testing of machine learning models in epileptogenic zone localization, enhancing their reliability and ultimately leading to better surgical outcomes for epilepsy patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"169 ","pages":"Pages 33-46"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724003304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Precise localization of the epileptogenic zone is critical for successful epilepsy surgery. However, imbalanced datasets in terms of epileptic vs. normal electrode contacts and a lack of standardized evaluation guidelines hinder the consistent evaluation of automatic machine learning localization models.
Methods
This study addresses these challenges by analyzing class imbalance in clinical datasets and evaluating common assessment metrics. Data from 139 drug-resistant epilepsy patients across two Institutions were analyzed. Metric behaviors were examined using clinical and simulated data.
Results
Complementary use of Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) provides an optimal evaluation approach. This must be paired with an analysis of class imbalance and its impact due to significant variations found in clinical datasets.
Conclusions
The proposed framework offers a comprehensive and reliable method for evaluating machine learning models in epileptogenic zone localization, improving their precision and clinical relevance.
Significance
Adopting this framework will improve the comparability and multicenter testing of machine learning models in epileptogenic zone localization, enhancing their reliability and ultimately leading to better surgical outcomes for epilepsy patients.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.