Modelling methane production of dairy cows: A hierarchical Bayesian stochastic approach

IF 7.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2024.109683
Cécile M. Levrault , Nico W.M. Ogink , Jan Dijkstra , Peter W.G. Groot Koerkamp , Kelly Nichols , Fred A. van Eeuwijk , Carel F.W. Peeters
{"title":"Modelling methane production of dairy cows: A hierarchical Bayesian stochastic approach","authors":"Cécile M. Levrault ,&nbsp;Nico W.M. Ogink ,&nbsp;Jan Dijkstra ,&nbsp;Peter W.G. Groot Koerkamp ,&nbsp;Kelly Nichols ,&nbsp;Fred A. van Eeuwijk ,&nbsp;Carel F.W. Peeters","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring methane production from individual cows is required for evaluating the success of greenhouse gas reduction strategies. However, converting non-continuous measurements of methane production into daily methane production rates (MPR) remains challenging due to the general non-linearity of the methane production curve. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian hierarchical stochastic kinetic equation approach to address this challenge, enabling the sharing of information across cows for improved modelling. We fit a non-linear curve on climate respiration chamber (CRC) data of 28 dairy cows before computing an area under the curve, thereby providing an estimate of MPR from individual cows, yielding a monitored and predicted population mean of 416.7 ± 36.2 g/d and 407.2 ± 35.0 g/d respectively. The shape parameters of this model were pooled across cows (population-level), while the scale parameter varied between individuals. This allowed for the characterization of variation in MPR within and between cows. Model fit was thoroughly investigated through posterior predictive checking, which showed that the model could reproduce this CRC data accurately. Comparison with a fully pooled model (all parameters constant across cows) was evaluated through cross-validation, where the Hierarchical Methane Rate (HMR) model performed better (difference in expected log predictive density of 1653). Concordance between the values observed in the CRC and those predicted by HMR was assessed with R<sup>2</sup> (0.995), root mean square error (10.0 g/d), and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (0.961). Overall, the predictions made by the HMR model appeared to reflect individual MPR levels and variation between cows as well as the standard analytical approach taken by scientists with CRC data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 109683"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924010743","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring methane production from individual cows is required for evaluating the success of greenhouse gas reduction strategies. However, converting non-continuous measurements of methane production into daily methane production rates (MPR) remains challenging due to the general non-linearity of the methane production curve. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian hierarchical stochastic kinetic equation approach to address this challenge, enabling the sharing of information across cows for improved modelling. We fit a non-linear curve on climate respiration chamber (CRC) data of 28 dairy cows before computing an area under the curve, thereby providing an estimate of MPR from individual cows, yielding a monitored and predicted population mean of 416.7 ± 36.2 g/d and 407.2 ± 35.0 g/d respectively. The shape parameters of this model were pooled across cows (population-level), while the scale parameter varied between individuals. This allowed for the characterization of variation in MPR within and between cows. Model fit was thoroughly investigated through posterior predictive checking, which showed that the model could reproduce this CRC data accurately. Comparison with a fully pooled model (all parameters constant across cows) was evaluated through cross-validation, where the Hierarchical Methane Rate (HMR) model performed better (difference in expected log predictive density of 1653). Concordance between the values observed in the CRC and those predicted by HMR was assessed with R2 (0.995), root mean square error (10.0 g/d), and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (0.961). Overall, the predictions made by the HMR model appeared to reflect individual MPR levels and variation between cows as well as the standard analytical approach taken by scientists with CRC data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奶牛甲烷生产建模:分层贝叶斯随机方法
要评估温室气体减排战略的成功与否,就必须监测每头奶牛的甲烷产量。然而,由于甲烷产量曲线一般具有非线性,因此将非连续的甲烷产量测量值转换为日甲烷产量率(MPR)仍具有挑战性。在本文中,我们提出了一种贝叶斯分层随机动力学方程方法来应对这一挑战,从而实现跨奶牛的信息共享,改进建模。我们对 28 头奶牛的气候呼吸室 (CRC) 数据进行了非线性曲线拟合,然后计算曲线下的面积,从而估算出每头奶牛的甲烷产生量,得出监测和预测的群体平均甲烷产生量分别为 416.7 ± 36.2 克/天和 407.2 ± 35.0 克/天。该模型的形状参数在所有奶牛(群体水平)中集中使用,而比例参数则因个体而异。这样就可以确定奶牛内部和奶牛之间 MPR 的变化特征。通过后验预测检查对模型的拟合性进行了全面研究,结果表明该模型能够准确再现 CRC 数据。通过交叉验证评估了与完全集合模型(所有参数在不同奶牛之间保持不变)的比较,发现分层甲烷率(HMR)模型的表现更好(预期对数预测密度的差异为 1653)。用 R2(0.995)、均方根误差(10.0 克/天)和 Lin 一致性相关系数(0.961)评估了 CRC 观察值与 HMR 预测值之间的一致性。总体而言,HMR 模型所做的预测似乎反映了奶牛个体的 MPR 水平和奶牛之间的差异,也反映了科学家对 CRC 数据所采用的标准分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
期刊最新文献
Optimization and testing of a mechanical roller seeder based on DEM-MBD rice potting tray Development of plant phenotyping system using Pan Tilt Zoom camera and verification of its validity Human robot interaction for agricultural Tele-Operation, using virtual Reality: A feasibility study Corrigendum to “A chlorophyll-constrained semi-empirical model for estimating leaf area index using a red-edge vegetation index” [Comput. Electron. Agric. 220 (2024) 108891] Design and experiment of monitoring system for feed rate on sugarcane chopper harvester
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1