Comparing perceptions of operational inefficiencies among clinical healthcare workers by professional role

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104424
P.J. Sprik , M.C. Schall Jr. , L.M. Boitet , K.A. Meese , D.A. Rogers
{"title":"Comparing perceptions of operational inefficiencies among clinical healthcare workers by professional role","authors":"P.J. Sprik ,&nbsp;M.C. Schall Jr. ,&nbsp;L.M. Boitet ,&nbsp;K.A. Meese ,&nbsp;D.A. Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Operational inefficiencies remain a critical occupational burden to clinical healthcare workers, contributing to adverse organizational and employee outcomes. Perceptions of these inefficiencies likely vary across occupational roles, yet these differences have not been thoroughly explored in the healthcare setting. To address this gap, inefficiencies at work were self-reported by 1083 interdisciplinary clinical healthcare workers within a large academic medical center in the southeastern United States. A qualitative inductive thematic analysis was used to describe employee perceptions of work tasks, processes, or systems that seem duplicative, poorly designed, or unnecessary. Matrix coding was used to explore differences based on professional roles. Specific inefficiencies were differentially experienced across professional roles, including but not limited to role definition, education, and staffing. The reported differences highlight the need to engage with all healthcare workers to enhance the experience of all roles across the organization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024002011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Operational inefficiencies remain a critical occupational burden to clinical healthcare workers, contributing to adverse organizational and employee outcomes. Perceptions of these inefficiencies likely vary across occupational roles, yet these differences have not been thoroughly explored in the healthcare setting. To address this gap, inefficiencies at work were self-reported by 1083 interdisciplinary clinical healthcare workers within a large academic medical center in the southeastern United States. A qualitative inductive thematic analysis was used to describe employee perceptions of work tasks, processes, or systems that seem duplicative, poorly designed, or unnecessary. Matrix coding was used to explore differences based on professional roles. Specific inefficiencies were differentially experienced across professional roles, including but not limited to role definition, education, and staffing. The reported differences highlight the need to engage with all healthcare workers to enhance the experience of all roles across the organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较不同专业角色的临床医护人员对操作效率低下的看法
操作效率低下仍然是临床医护人员的一个重要职业负担,会对组织和员工造成不利影响。不同的职业角色对这些低效率的看法可能会有所不同,但这些差异在医疗环境中尚未得到深入探讨。为了填补这一空白,美国东南部一家大型学术医疗中心的 1083 名跨学科临床医护人员对工作中的低效率进行了自我报告。我们采用定性归纳主题分析法来描述员工对工作任务、流程或系统的看法,这些工作任务、流程或系统似乎是重复的、设计不当的或不必要的。矩阵编码被用来探索基于专业角色的差异。不同专业角色在具体的低效方面存在差异,包括但不限于角色定义、教育和人员配备。所报告的差异凸显了与所有医护人员合作的必要性,以提升整个组织内所有角色的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Comparing perceptions of operational inefficiencies among clinical healthcare workers by professional role Study on the relationship between muscle fatigue and motion sickness responses in different sitting postures under ship rocking conditions Evaluating changes in slip-resistance performance of select IceFX® winter boots in real-world use over a winter season Effects of different block designs on low back and shoulders biomechanical loads and postural stability during crab pot handling Digital technologies and resilient performance in socio-technical systems: A human factors and ergonomics perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1