What is the optimal display range? Exploring the impacts of area and shape on in-vehicle head-up display efficiency.

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104464
Yici Zhang, Yan Ge, Ying Zhou, Weina Qu, Jingyu Zhang, Liu Tang, Hongjiang Du, Xing Chen
{"title":"What is the optimal display range? Exploring the impacts of area and shape on in-vehicle head-up display efficiency.","authors":"Yici Zhang, Yan Ge, Ying Zhou, Weina Qu, Jingyu Zhang, Liu Tang, Hongjiang Du, Xing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In-vehicle Head-Up Displays (HUDs) are expected to incorporate more information in the future, necessitating deeper understandings of design properties that can enhance display safety and efficiency. However, the optimal display characteristics-particularly in terms of area and shape-remain inadequately understood. This study investigated these two factors by manipulating horizontal and vertical Field of View (FOV) angles within a simulated in-vehicle HUD. Thirty-one participants participated in this laboratory-based study they completed a digit matching task while driving within a driving simulator. The accuracy and response time of the task served as indicators for efficiency. The standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) was employed to assess area and shape's impacts on driving performance, alongside subjective ease-of-use evaluations. Results indicated that an increase in horizontal FOV angle significantly delay response times and reduce ease-of-use ratings. We also observed significant effects of area and shape on response time and ratings; specifically, participants responded faster in smaller display area conditions, which were also rated as the easiest to use. Accuracy, however, was largely unaffected by size and shape. Importantly, most manipulations did not interfere with driving performance, except for the area 500 condition, wherein landscape shape was associated with better lane-keeping performance. Our findings provide valuable insights for the design of in-vehicle HUDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"104464"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In-vehicle Head-Up Displays (HUDs) are expected to incorporate more information in the future, necessitating deeper understandings of design properties that can enhance display safety and efficiency. However, the optimal display characteristics-particularly in terms of area and shape-remain inadequately understood. This study investigated these two factors by manipulating horizontal and vertical Field of View (FOV) angles within a simulated in-vehicle HUD. Thirty-one participants participated in this laboratory-based study they completed a digit matching task while driving within a driving simulator. The accuracy and response time of the task served as indicators for efficiency. The standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) was employed to assess area and shape's impacts on driving performance, alongside subjective ease-of-use evaluations. Results indicated that an increase in horizontal FOV angle significantly delay response times and reduce ease-of-use ratings. We also observed significant effects of area and shape on response time and ratings; specifically, participants responded faster in smaller display area conditions, which were also rated as the easiest to use. Accuracy, however, was largely unaffected by size and shape. Importantly, most manipulations did not interfere with driving performance, except for the area 500 condition, wherein landscape shape was associated with better lane-keeping performance. Our findings provide valuable insights for the design of in-vehicle HUDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最佳显示范围是什么?探索面积和形状对车载平视显示效率的影响。
车载平视显示器(HUD)有望在未来集成更多信息,因此有必要深入了解可提高显示安全性和效率的设计特性。然而,人们对最佳的显示特性,尤其是面积和形状方面的特性,仍然缺乏足够的了解。本研究通过操纵模拟车载 HUD 的水平和垂直视场角 (FOV) 来研究这两个因素。31 名参与者参加了这项基于实验室的研究,他们在驾驶模拟器中完成了一项数字匹配任务。任务的准确性和响应时间是效率的指标。横向位置标准偏差(SDLP)用于评估面积和形状对驾驶性能的影响,以及主观易用性评价。结果表明,水平视场角的增加会明显延迟响应时间,并降低易用性评分。我们还观察到面积和形状对反应时间和评分的明显影响;具体而言,在显示面积较小的条件下,参与者的反应速度更快,同时也被评为最易于使用。然而,准确性在很大程度上不受面积和形状的影响。重要的是,除了面积为 500 的条件外,大多数操作都不会影响驾驶性能,在这种条件下,景观形状与更好的车道保持性能相关。我们的研究结果为车载 HUD 的设计提供了宝贵的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Navigating the complexity of emergency department care coordination: A qualitative exploration of adaptive strategies using a tabletop sandbox simulation. What is the optimal display range? Exploring the impacts of area and shape on in-vehicle head-up display efficiency. Development and validation of spatial disorientation scenarios using virtual reality and motion simulator. Evaluation of color in digital nuclear power plant control room displays. Examining clinicians' fatigue in a pediatric emergency department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1