The effect of electric vehicle use on trip frequency and vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) in the Netherlands

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104325
Linlin Zhang, Dea van Lierop, Dick Ettema
{"title":"The effect of electric vehicle use on trip frequency and vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) in the Netherlands","authors":"Linlin Zhang,&nbsp;Dea van Lierop,&nbsp;Dick Ettema","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition from conventional vehicles to battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) is expected to significantly contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. However, the effectiveness of this transition depends on how BEVs and PHEVs are used compared to internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). This paper analyzes data from the 2018–2020 Dutch National Travel Surveys to assess travel behavior of single-car households across four vehicle types: ICEVs, HEVs, PHEVs, and BEVs. Specifically, we focus on daily trip frequency and vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) for both commuting and non-commuting purposes, while examining how these vehicle usage patterns correlate with vehicle attributes, socioeconomic and demographic factors, and the built environment. Our descriptive analysis shows that BEV and PHEV users have significantly longer daily VKT for both commuting and non-commuting travel compared to ICEV and HEV users. The model results reveal that after controlloing for various factors, BEVs are associated with shorter daily VKT for non-commuting travel compared to other powertrain types, while a pattern not observed for commuting travel. Notably, there is no evidence of a rebound effect linked to the use of BEV and PHEV powertrains. Additionally, leased or company vehicles, regardless of powertrain type, are associated with higher daily VKT and a higher probability of trip-making compared to privately owned vehicles. This higher daily VKT observed for BEV and PHEV users is largely due to the higher prevalence of their vehicles being leased or company cars, rather than the powertrain type itself.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104325"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424003732","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition from conventional vehicles to battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) is expected to significantly contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. However, the effectiveness of this transition depends on how BEVs and PHEVs are used compared to internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). This paper analyzes data from the 2018–2020 Dutch National Travel Surveys to assess travel behavior of single-car households across four vehicle types: ICEVs, HEVs, PHEVs, and BEVs. Specifically, we focus on daily trip frequency and vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) for both commuting and non-commuting purposes, while examining how these vehicle usage patterns correlate with vehicle attributes, socioeconomic and demographic factors, and the built environment. Our descriptive analysis shows that BEV and PHEV users have significantly longer daily VKT for both commuting and non-commuting travel compared to ICEV and HEV users. The model results reveal that after controlloing for various factors, BEVs are associated with shorter daily VKT for non-commuting travel compared to other powertrain types, while a pattern not observed for commuting travel. Notably, there is no evidence of a rebound effect linked to the use of BEV and PHEV powertrains. Additionally, leased or company vehicles, regardless of powertrain type, are associated with higher daily VKT and a higher probability of trip-making compared to privately owned vehicles. This higher daily VKT observed for BEV and PHEV users is largely due to the higher prevalence of their vehicles being leased or company cars, rather than the powertrain type itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰使用电动汽车对出行频率和车辆行驶公里数(VKT)的影响
从传统汽车向电池电动汽车(BEV)和插电式混合动力电动汽车(PHEV)过渡,预计将大大有助于减少交通部门的温室气体排放。然而,与内燃机汽车(ICEV)和混合动力电动汽车(HEV)相比,这种过渡的效果取决于 BEV 和 PHEV 的使用方式。本文分析了 2018-2020 年荷兰全国出行调查的数据,以评估单车家庭在四种车辆类型中的出行行为:ICEV、HEV、PHEV 和 BEV。具体而言,我们关注通勤和非通勤目的的每日出行频率和车辆行驶公里数(VKT),同时研究这些车辆使用模式与车辆属性、社会经济和人口因素以及建筑环境之间的关联。我们的描述性分析表明,与 ICEV 和 HEV 用户相比,BEV 和 PHEV 用户每天通勤和非通勤出行的 VKT 都明显更长。模型结果显示,在对各种因素进行控制后,与其他动力总成类型相比,BEV 在非通勤出行中的日 VKT 更短,而在通勤出行中却没有观察到这种模式。值得注意的是,没有证据表明使用 BEV 和 PHEV 动力系统会产生反弹效应。此外,与私人拥有的车辆相比,租赁或公司车辆(无论动力总成类型如何)具有更高的日总行驶里程(VKT)和更高的出行概率。在 BEV 和 PHEV 用户中观察到的较高的日 VKT 很大程度上是由于他们的车辆是租赁车辆或公司车辆,而非动力系统类型本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
The effect of electric vehicle use on trip frequency and vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) in the Netherlands Causal inference for transport research Eating-out behavior across different restaurant segment types: Implications for transportation, public health, and food service sectors Travel decision making under uncertainty and road traffic behavior: The multifold role of ambiguity attitude Digital payment adoption in public transportation: Mediating role of mode choice segments in developing cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1