Using the coefficient of determination to identify injury regions after stroke in pre-clinical FDG-PET images.

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109401
Wuxian He, Hongtu Tang, Jia Li, Xiaoyan Shen, Xuechen Zhang, Chenrui Li, Huafeng Liu, Weichuan Yu
{"title":"Using the coefficient of determination to identify injury regions after stroke in pre-clinical FDG-PET images.","authors":"Wuxian He, Hongtu Tang, Jia Li, Xiaoyan Shen, Xuechen Zhang, Chenrui Li, Huafeng Liu, Weichuan Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the analysis of brain fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) images, intensity normalization is a necessary step to reduce inter-subject variability. However, the choice of the most appropriate normalization method in stroke studies remains unclear, as demonstrated by inconsistent findings in the literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Here, we propose a regression- and single-subject-based model for analyzing FDG-PET images without intensity normalization. Two independent data sets were collected before and after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), with one comprising 120 rats and the other 96 rats. After data preprocessing, voxel intensities in the same region and hemisphere were paired before and after the MCAO scan. A linear regression model was applied to the paired data, and the coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup> was calculated to measure the linearity. The R<sup>2</sup> values between the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres were compared, and significant regions were defined as those with reduced linearity. Our method was compared with voxel-wise analysis under different intensity normalization methods and validated using the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The significant regions identified by the proposed method showed a large degree of overlap with the infarcted regions identified by TTC data, as measured by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The average DSC of the proposed method was 59.7%, whereas the DSCs of the existing approaches ranged from 41.4%∼51.3%. Additional validation using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) of the average ROC curves reached 0.84 using the proposed method, whereas existing methods achieved AUCs ranging from 0.77∼0.79. The identified regions were consistent across the two independent data sets, and some findings were corroborated by other publications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed model presents a novel quantitative approach for identifying injury regions post-stroke using FDG-PET images. The calculation does not require intensity normalization and can be applied to individual subjects. The method yields more sensitive results compared to existing identification methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"184 ","pages":"109401"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the analysis of brain fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) images, intensity normalization is a necessary step to reduce inter-subject variability. However, the choice of the most appropriate normalization method in stroke studies remains unclear, as demonstrated by inconsistent findings in the literature.

Materials and methods: Here, we propose a regression- and single-subject-based model for analyzing FDG-PET images without intensity normalization. Two independent data sets were collected before and after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), with one comprising 120 rats and the other 96 rats. After data preprocessing, voxel intensities in the same region and hemisphere were paired before and after the MCAO scan. A linear regression model was applied to the paired data, and the coefficient of determination R2 was calculated to measure the linearity. The R2 values between the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres were compared, and significant regions were defined as those with reduced linearity. Our method was compared with voxel-wise analysis under different intensity normalization methods and validated using the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining data.

Results: The significant regions identified by the proposed method showed a large degree of overlap with the infarcted regions identified by TTC data, as measured by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The average DSC of the proposed method was 59.7%, whereas the DSCs of the existing approaches ranged from 41.4%∼51.3%. Additional validation using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) of the average ROC curves reached 0.84 using the proposed method, whereas existing methods achieved AUCs ranging from 0.77∼0.79. The identified regions were consistent across the two independent data sets, and some findings were corroborated by other publications.

Conclusions: The proposed model presents a novel quantitative approach for identifying injury regions post-stroke using FDG-PET images. The calculation does not require intensity normalization and can be applied to individual subjects. The method yields more sensitive results compared to existing identification methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用判定系数识别临床前 FDG-PET 图像中中风后的损伤区域。
背景:在分析脑部氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)图像时,强度归一化是减少受试者间变异的必要步骤。材料与方法:在此,我们提出了一种基于回归和单受试者的模型,用于分析无强度归一化的 FDG-PET 图像。我们收集了大脑中动脉闭塞(MCAO)前后的两组独立数据,一组包括 120 只大鼠,另一组包括 96 只大鼠。数据预处理后,同一区域和半球的体素强度在 MCAO 扫描前后配对。对配对数据采用线性回归模型,并计算决定系数 R2 以衡量线性度。比较同侧半球和对侧半球的 R2 值,将线性度降低的区域定义为显著区域。我们的方法与不同强度归一化方法下的体素分析进行了比较,并使用三苯基氯化四氮唑(TTC)染色数据进行了验证:结果:根据戴斯相似性系数(DSC)的测量,拟议方法确定的重要区域与 TTC 数据确定的梗死区域有很大程度的重叠。拟议方法的平均 DSC 为 59.7%,而现有方法的 DSC 为 41.4%∼51.3%。使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)进行的额外验证表明,拟议方法的平均 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)达到了 0.84,而现有方法的 AUC 在 0.77 至 0.79 之间。在两个独立的数据集中,所识别的区域是一致的,一些发现也得到了其他出版物的证实:结论:所提出的模型是一种利用 FDG-PET 图像识别卒中后损伤区域的新型定量方法。该计算方法不需要强度归一化,可应用于单个受试者。与现有的识别方法相比,该方法能得到更灵敏的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
An adaptive enhanced human memory algorithm for multi-level image segmentation for pathological lung cancer images. Integrating multimodal learning for improved vital health parameter estimation. Riemannian manifold-based geometric clustering of continuous glucose monitoring to improve personalized diabetes management. Transformative artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: Advancements in diagnostic techniques. Artificial intelligence and deep learning algorithms for epigenetic sequence analysis: A review for epigeneticists and AI experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1