What does a consent conversation for whole genome sequencing look like in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service? An observational study.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY European Journal of Human Genetics Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1038/s41431-024-01749-x
Holly Ellard, Huda Alfardus, Saskia Sanderson, Celine Lewis
{"title":"What does a consent conversation for whole genome sequencing look like in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service? An observational study.","authors":"Holly Ellard, Huda Alfardus, Saskia Sanderson, Celine Lewis","doi":"10.1038/s41431-024-01749-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient choice consent for whole genome sequencing (WGS) through the Genomic Medicine Service in England covers consent to diagnostic testing and an invitation to the National Genomic Research Library (NGRL). Little is known about what consent conversations for WGS look like in practice. We audio-recorded and analysed the content and structure of consent appointments (n = 26) between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and parents of children with rare disease across seven NHS Trusts. Appointments frequently covered the potential findings from testing, implications for family members, and DNA storage, but often omitted that data may be reanalysed in the future if a diagnosis is not made. Consent to the NGRL was typically sought during the same appointment; these discussions varied in content, but frequently included a background to the NGRL and data security. HCPs often tempered expectations around what WGS can achieve and asked questions to clarify parents' understanding, but less commonly elicited parents' values and concerns. Administrative tasks were time-consuming, but took less time when consent was recorded digitally. Future training should emphasise how to elicit patients' values and concerns. Digital infrastructure and hiring roles such as genomic associates to support consent may be important strategies to meet the workload demands of WGS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12016,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-024-01749-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient choice consent for whole genome sequencing (WGS) through the Genomic Medicine Service in England covers consent to diagnostic testing and an invitation to the National Genomic Research Library (NGRL). Little is known about what consent conversations for WGS look like in practice. We audio-recorded and analysed the content and structure of consent appointments (n = 26) between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and parents of children with rare disease across seven NHS Trusts. Appointments frequently covered the potential findings from testing, implications for family members, and DNA storage, but often omitted that data may be reanalysed in the future if a diagnosis is not made. Consent to the NGRL was typically sought during the same appointment; these discussions varied in content, but frequently included a background to the NGRL and data security. HCPs often tempered expectations around what WGS can achieve and asked questions to clarify parents' understanding, but less commonly elicited parents' values and concerns. Administrative tasks were time-consuming, but took less time when consent was recorded digitally. Future training should emphasise how to elicit patients' values and concerns. Digital infrastructure and hiring roles such as genomic associates to support consent may be important strategies to meet the workload demands of WGS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国国家医疗服务系统基因组医学服务中,全基因组测序的同意谈话是什么样的?一项观察研究。
英国基因组医学服务机构的全基因组测序(WGS)患者选择同意书包括诊断测试同意书和国家基因组研究图书馆(NGRL)邀请函。关于 WGS 的同意对话在实践中是什么样的,人们知之甚少。我们对七个英国国家医疗服务系统托管机构的医疗保健专业人员 (HCP) 与罕见病患儿家长之间的同意预约(n = 26)的内容和结构进行了录音和分析。预约内容通常包括检测的潜在结果、对家庭成员的影响以及 DNA 存储,但往往忽略了如果未做出诊断,将来可能会对数据进行重新分析。通常在同一次预约中征求对 NGRL 的同意;这些讨论的内容各不相同,但经常包括 NGRL 的背景和数据安全。保健医生通常会降低家长对 WGS 所能达到目的的期望值,并提出问题以澄清家长的理解,但较少征询家长的价值观和顾虑。行政工作耗时,但以数字方式记录同意时耗时较少。今后的培训应强调如何了解患者的价值观和顾虑。数字基础设施和聘用基因组助理等支持同意的角色可能是满足 WGS 工作量需求的重要策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Human Genetics
European Journal of Human Genetics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
216
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Human Genetics is the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics, publishing high-quality, original research papers, short reports and reviews in the rapidly expanding field of human genetics and genomics. It covers molecular, clinical and cytogenetics, interfacing between advanced biomedical research and the clinician, and bridging the great diversity of facilities, resources and viewpoints in the genetics community. Key areas include: -Monogenic and multifactorial disorders -Development and malformation -Hereditary cancer -Medical Genomics -Gene mapping and functional studies -Genotype-phenotype correlations -Genetic variation and genome diversity -Statistical and computational genetics -Bioinformatics -Advances in diagnostics -Therapy and prevention -Animal models -Genetic services -Community genetics
期刊最新文献
Assessing the unmet needs of genomic testing in Australia: a geospatial exploration. Molecular diagnoses and candidate gene identification in the congenital heart disease cohorts of the 100,000 genomes project. What does a consent conversation for whole genome sequencing look like in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service? An observational study. Considering severity in the design of reproductive genetic carrier screening programs: screening for severe conditions. Correction: Slowly progressive autosomal dominant Alport Syndrome due to COL4A3 splicing variant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1