Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy occurrence: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15965
Ana Carolina Sarmento Brim, Victor Rivera Duran Barretto, José Guilherme Reis-Oliveira, Renata Balthazar da Silveira de Araújo, Ana Célia Diniz Cabral Barbosa Romeo
{"title":"Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy occurrence: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ana Carolina Sarmento Brim, Victor Rivera Duran Barretto, José Guilherme Reis-Oliveira, Renata Balthazar da Silveira de Araújo, Ana Célia Diniz Cabral Barbosa Romeo","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the high incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) in the general population and the high maternal morbidity and mortality rates associated with it, determining risk factors for the occurrence of EP is essential for directing attention and care to risk groups, aiming for early diagnosis, favorable outcomes, and the development of prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the occurrence of EP.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed on the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, The Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library (VHL), searching the following terms \"Ectopic Pregnancy\" or \"Ectopic Gestation\" and \"Risk Factors\" or \"Predisposing Factors\".</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>The inclusion criteria were observational studies published in English and Portuguese. We excluded studies with undefined methodology and those published before the year 2000.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>The authors independently read the titles, abstracts, and full texts, using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and discussed any differences. Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed by each author in a standardized way. Sixteen risk factors were evaluated. The meta-analysis calculations were performed using the Reviewer Manager 5.3 software (RevMan 5.3).</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The study found 715 studies, of which 11 were selected for review. The surveys were conducted between 2003 and 2019 and included 25 051 patients. The study revealed that several factors were strongly associated with the occurrence of EP. These included EP history (OR 9.03; 95% CI: 7.18-11.35; I<sup>2</sup> = 67%), pelvic inflammatory disease (OR 4.00; 95% CI: 3.46-4.61; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), infertility (OR 3.70; 95% CI: 3.23-4.23; I<sup>2</sup> = 48%), abdominal and pelvic surgeries (OR 5.60; 95% CI: 4.83-6.49; I<sup>2</sup> = 81%), and previous tubal ligation (OR 5.59; 95% CI: 2.49-12.55; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Furthermore, the study showed that advanced maternal age, smoking, number of partners exceeding one, history of spontaneous and induced abortion, previous use of emergency contraception, and intrauterine device, demonstrated a slightly increased risk. Advanced maternal age within the range of 30-34 years (OR 1.13; 95% CI: 1.03-1.24; I<sup>1</sup> = 11%) and ≥ 40 years (OR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.19-1.78; I<sup>1</sup> = 88%), marital status (OR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03-1.37; I<sup>2</sup> = 88%), and the use of oral contraceptives (OR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66-0.90; I<sup>2</sup> = 86%) were also found to be associated with a slightly increased or decreased risk of EP, respectively. The impact of condom use on the occurrence of EP seems to be very limited (OR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.83-1.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the study findings, it is suggested that the presence of strong risk factors warrants the implementation of a screening policy for EP among these women.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given the high incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) in the general population and the high maternal morbidity and mortality rates associated with it, determining risk factors for the occurrence of EP is essential for directing attention and care to risk groups, aiming for early diagnosis, favorable outcomes, and the development of prevention strategies.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the occurrence of EP.

Search strategy: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed on the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, The Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library (VHL), searching the following terms "Ectopic Pregnancy" or "Ectopic Gestation" and "Risk Factors" or "Predisposing Factors".

Selection criteria: The inclusion criteria were observational studies published in English and Portuguese. We excluded studies with undefined methodology and those published before the year 2000.

Data collection and analysis: The authors independently read the titles, abstracts, and full texts, using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and discussed any differences. Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed by each author in a standardized way. Sixteen risk factors were evaluated. The meta-analysis calculations were performed using the Reviewer Manager 5.3 software (RevMan 5.3).

Main results: The study found 715 studies, of which 11 were selected for review. The surveys were conducted between 2003 and 2019 and included 25 051 patients. The study revealed that several factors were strongly associated with the occurrence of EP. These included EP history (OR 9.03; 95% CI: 7.18-11.35; I2 = 67%), pelvic inflammatory disease (OR 4.00; 95% CI: 3.46-4.61; I2 = 0%), infertility (OR 3.70; 95% CI: 3.23-4.23; I2 = 48%), abdominal and pelvic surgeries (OR 5.60; 95% CI: 4.83-6.49; I2 = 81%), and previous tubal ligation (OR 5.59; 95% CI: 2.49-12.55; I2 = 0%). Furthermore, the study showed that advanced maternal age, smoking, number of partners exceeding one, history of spontaneous and induced abortion, previous use of emergency contraception, and intrauterine device, demonstrated a slightly increased risk. Advanced maternal age within the range of 30-34 years (OR 1.13; 95% CI: 1.03-1.24; I1 = 11%) and ≥ 40 years (OR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.19-1.78; I1 = 88%), marital status (OR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03-1.37; I2 = 88%), and the use of oral contraceptives (OR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66-0.90; I2 = 86%) were also found to be associated with a slightly increased or decreased risk of EP, respectively. The impact of condom use on the occurrence of EP seems to be very limited (OR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.83-1.05; I2 = 83%).

Conclusion: Based on the study findings, it is suggested that the presence of strong risk factors warrants the implementation of a screening policy for EP among these women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫外孕发生的风险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:鉴于宫外孕(EP)在普通人群中的高发病率以及与之相关的孕产妇高发病率和高死亡率,确定宫外孕发生的风险因素对于引导对风险人群的关注和护理至关重要,其目的在于早期诊断、良好的预后以及制定预防策略:本研究旨在确定发生 EP 的风险因素:检索策略:在 MEDLINE/PubMed、LILACS、The Cochrane Library 和 Virtual Health Library (VHL) 等电子数据库中以 "异位妊娠 "或 "异位妊娠 "和 "风险因素 "或 "易感因素 "为关键词进行了系统综述和荟萃分析:纳入标准为以英语和葡萄牙语发表的观察性研究。数据收集与分析:作者使用预先定义的纳入和排除标准独立阅读了研究的标题、摘要和全文,并就任何差异进行了讨论。数据提取和方法学质量评估由每位作者以标准化方式进行。共评估了 16 个风险因素。主要结果:研究发现了 715 项研究,其中 11 项被选中进行审查。这些调查在 2003 年至 2019 年期间进行,共纳入 25 051 名患者。研究显示,有几个因素与 EP 的发生密切相关。这些因素包括 EP 病史(OR 9.03;95% CI:7.18-11.35;I2 = 67%)、盆腔炎(OR 4.00;95% CI:3.46-4.61;I2 = 0%)、不孕症(OR 3.70;95% CI:3.23-4.23; I2 = 48%)、腹部和盆腔手术(OR 5.60; 95% CI: 4.83-6.49; I2 = 81%)、既往输卵管结扎(OR 5.59; 95% CI: 2.49-12.55; I2 = 0%)。此外,研究还显示,高龄产妇、吸烟、伴侣数量超过一个、自然流产和人工流产史、曾使用过紧急避孕药和宫内节育器的风险略有增加。高龄产妇年龄在 30-34 岁之间(OR 1.13;95% CI:1.03-1.24;I1 = 11%)和≥40 岁(OR 1.46;95% CI:1.19-1.78;I1 = 88%)、婚姻状况(OR 1.19;95% CI:1.此外,还发现使用口服避孕药(OR 0.77;95% CI:0.66-0.90;I2 = 86%)也分别与 EP 风险的轻微增加或降低有关。使用安全套对发生 EP 的影响似乎非常有限(OR 0.93;95% CI:0.83-1.05;I2 = 83%):根据研究结果,建议在这些妇女中实施 EP 筛查政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Prevention of maternal mortality with interventions in primary care services: What can we do? Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy occurrence: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology devices designed for low- and middle-income countries: A narrative review. The impact of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries on the interpregnancy interval and pregnancy complications of subsequent delivery: A retrospective study. HPV E6/E7 mRNA screening alone can be used as a screening method for cervical cancer in premenopausal women in China: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1