Effect of Patient Age on Decisional Regret After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005730
Nathan R King, Alison M Zeccola, Li Wang, John A Harris, Christine E Foley
{"title":"Effect of Patient Age on Decisional Regret After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.","authors":"Nathan R King, Alison M Zeccola, Li Wang, John A Harris, Christine E Foley","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare long-term decision regret between younger (30 years or younger) and older (31-49 years) patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to analyze patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign indications from 2009 to 2016. Respondents completed surveys including two validated decision regret scales: one measuring surgical decision regret and the other measuring loss-of-fertility regret. Participant aged was dichotomized as 30 years or younger and 31-49 years. Chi square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests and logistic regression were used to compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred eighty-seven participants were successfully contacted, and 241 completed the survey (84.0%). Seventy-seven respondents (32.0%) were aged 30 years or younger, and 164 (68.0%) were aged 31-49 years. The average time since surgery was 7.2 years (±2.2 years; range 3.7-12.1 years). Participants aged 30 years or younger regretted both undergoing surgery (32.5% vs 9.1%, P<.001; OR 4.8, 95% CI, 2.3-9.8) and loss of fertility (39.0% vs 13.4%, P<.001, OR 4.1, 95% CI, 2.2-7.8) at significantly higher rates than participants aged 31-49 years. Overall, 83.1% of younger participants agreed that hysterectomy was the right choice compared with 97% of older participants (P<.001). Higher rates of surgical and loss-of-fertility regret were seen in participants with self-reported pelvic pain (P=.003, P=.011), preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis (P=.037, P=.046), and postoperative complications (P=.043, P<.001). Although time since hysterectomy did not affect rate of surgical regret (P=.138), participants further from their hysterectomies had lower rates of loss-of-fertility regret (P=.003). Patient age remained significantly associated with both surgical regret (adjusted OR 2.9 (95% CI, 1.3-6.5) and loss-of-fertility regret (adjusted OR 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3-6.0) on multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants aged 30 years or younger were more likely to regret their decision to undergo hysterectomy than participants aged 31-49 years, regardless of parity, prior sterilization, or previous treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"144 6","pages":"757-764"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare long-term decision regret between younger (30 years or younger) and older (31-49 years) patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease.

Methods: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to analyze patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign indications from 2009 to 2016. Respondents completed surveys including two validated decision regret scales: one measuring surgical decision regret and the other measuring loss-of-fertility regret. Participant aged was dichotomized as 30 years or younger and 31-49 years. Chi square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests and logistic regression were used to compare groups.

Results: Two hundred eighty-seven participants were successfully contacted, and 241 completed the survey (84.0%). Seventy-seven respondents (32.0%) were aged 30 years or younger, and 164 (68.0%) were aged 31-49 years. The average time since surgery was 7.2 years (±2.2 years; range 3.7-12.1 years). Participants aged 30 years or younger regretted both undergoing surgery (32.5% vs 9.1%, P<.001; OR 4.8, 95% CI, 2.3-9.8) and loss of fertility (39.0% vs 13.4%, P<.001, OR 4.1, 95% CI, 2.2-7.8) at significantly higher rates than participants aged 31-49 years. Overall, 83.1% of younger participants agreed that hysterectomy was the right choice compared with 97% of older participants (P<.001). Higher rates of surgical and loss-of-fertility regret were seen in participants with self-reported pelvic pain (P=.003, P=.011), preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis (P=.037, P=.046), and postoperative complications (P=.043, P<.001). Although time since hysterectomy did not affect rate of surgical regret (P=.138), participants further from their hysterectomies had lower rates of loss-of-fertility regret (P=.003). Patient age remained significantly associated with both surgical regret (adjusted OR 2.9 (95% CI, 1.3-6.5) and loss-of-fertility regret (adjusted OR 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3-6.0) on multivariable logistic regression.

Conclusion: Participants aged 30 years or younger were more likely to regret their decision to undergo hysterectomy than participants aged 31-49 years, regardless of parity, prior sterilization, or previous treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者年龄对腹腔镜子宫切除术后决策后悔的影响
目的比较因良性疾病接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的年轻(30 岁或以下)和年长(31-49 岁)患者的长期决策遗憾:我们进行了一项匹配的回顾性队列研究,分析了 2009 年至 2016 年期间因良性适应症接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的患者。受访者填写了调查问卷,其中包括两个经过验证的决策后悔量表:一个测量手术决策后悔,另一个测量丧失生育能力后悔。参与者的年龄被二分为 30 岁或以下和 31-49 岁。采用卡方检验、费雪精确检验、Wilcoxon 秩和检验和逻辑回归对各组进行比较:成功联系到 287 名参与者,其中 241 人(84.0%)完成了调查。77 名受访者(32.0%)的年龄在 30 岁或以下,164 名受访者(68.0%)的年龄在 31-49 岁之间。平均手术时间为 7.2 年(±2.2 年;范围为 3.7-12.1 年)。年龄在 30 岁或以下的参与者对接受手术均表示后悔(32.5% 对 9.1%,PC 结论:年龄在 30 岁或以下的参与者对接受手术均表示后悔:30岁或30岁以下的参与者比31-49岁的参与者更有可能后悔接受子宫切除术的决定,而与奇偶性、之前的绝育手术或之前的治疗无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
期刊最新文献
A New Way Forward for Women's Health Research at the National Institutes of Health: A Roadmap From the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Consensus Report. Association of Subcapsular Liver Hematoma With Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, or Hemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes, and Low Platelet Count Syndrome. Endometrium-Free Closure Technique During Cesarean Delivery for Reducing the Risk of Niche Formation and Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders. Associated Trends in Obesity and Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer in the United States. Augmentation of Interstitial Cystitis-Bladder Pain Syndrome Treatment With Meditation and Yoga: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1