Trends of in vitro pharmacological potency and in vivo pharmacokinetics parameters of modern drugs: Can the therapeutic/subtherapeutic dose be estimated from in vitro Ki and pharmacokinetic parameters?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Cts-Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1111/cts.70034
Toshiaki Tsuchitani, Motohiro Kato, Atsuko Tomaru, Yasunori Aoki, Yuichi Sugiyama
{"title":"Trends of in vitro pharmacological potency and in vivo pharmacokinetics parameters of modern drugs: Can the therapeutic/subtherapeutic dose be estimated from in vitro Ki and pharmacokinetic parameters?","authors":"Toshiaki Tsuchitani,&nbsp;Motohiro Kato,&nbsp;Atsuko Tomaru,&nbsp;Yasunori Aoki,&nbsp;Yuichi Sugiyama","doi":"10.1111/cts.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In drug discovery and development, estimating therapeutic and subtherapeutic doses is crucial for designing early-phase clinical trials, particularly first-in-human (FIH) studies. While increasing the in vitro pharmacological potency (lowering <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>) of a compound to its target is expected to decrease the therapeutic dose, its benefit is not necessarily clarified. We analyzed in vitro <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>, human in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters, and therapeutics doses of 144 oral small-molecule drugs approved in Japan (2010–2021). The data on classic drugs were obtained from Goodman and Gilman's textbook, 9th ed. (published in 1996). Modern drugs had lower <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> (2.5 nM) and daily doses (88 μmol/day) than classic drugs (33 nM and 313 μmol/day), but 3.6-fold higher intrinsic clearance (CL<sub>int</sub>; 171 vs. 47 L/h), suggest that increasing potency over the years has not resulted in a reduction in dosage as expected. Estimating therapeutic doses using target receptor occupancy (tRO)-optimized approach improved estimation accuracy (63% within 10-fold of observed values) compared with tRO-fixed approaches. Subtherapeutic dose estimations revealed a risk of overdosing in FIH trials, indicating that these estimates are not necessarily as conservative as is generally understood. Notably, the unbound average concentration-to-<i>K</i><sub>i</sub> ratio (<i>C</i><sub>ave,u</sub>/<i>K</i><sub>i</sub>) varied among drugs and correlated negatively with <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>, suggesting the possible necessity of incorporating it into dose estimation methods. This study provides insights into the relationship between in vitro <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>, in vivo PK parameters, and therapeutic dose of modern drugs, proposing strategies and revealing the risk for dose estimation and drug development in the era of highly potent small molecules.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In drug discovery and development, estimating therapeutic and subtherapeutic doses is crucial for designing early-phase clinical trials, particularly first-in-human (FIH) studies. While increasing the in vitro pharmacological potency (lowering Ki) of a compound to its target is expected to decrease the therapeutic dose, its benefit is not necessarily clarified. We analyzed in vitro Ki, human in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters, and therapeutics doses of 144 oral small-molecule drugs approved in Japan (2010–2021). The data on classic drugs were obtained from Goodman and Gilman's textbook, 9th ed. (published in 1996). Modern drugs had lower Ki (2.5 nM) and daily doses (88 μmol/day) than classic drugs (33 nM and 313 μmol/day), but 3.6-fold higher intrinsic clearance (CLint; 171 vs. 47 L/h), suggest that increasing potency over the years has not resulted in a reduction in dosage as expected. Estimating therapeutic doses using target receptor occupancy (tRO)-optimized approach improved estimation accuracy (63% within 10-fold of observed values) compared with tRO-fixed approaches. Subtherapeutic dose estimations revealed a risk of overdosing in FIH trials, indicating that these estimates are not necessarily as conservative as is generally understood. Notably, the unbound average concentration-to-Ki ratio (Cave,u/Ki) varied among drugs and correlated negatively with Ki, suggesting the possible necessity of incorporating it into dose estimation methods. This study provides insights into the relationship between in vitro Ki, in vivo PK parameters, and therapeutic dose of modern drugs, proposing strategies and revealing the risk for dose estimation and drug development in the era of highly potent small molecules.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代药物的体外药效和体内药代动力学参数的发展趋势:能否根据体外 Ki 和药代动力学参数估计治疗/亚治疗剂量?
在药物发现和开发过程中,估算治疗剂量和亚治疗剂量对于设计早期临床试验,尤其是首次人体试验(FIH)至关重要。虽然提高化合物对其靶点的体外药效(降低 Ki)有望减少治疗剂量,但其益处并不一定明确。我们分析了日本批准的 144 种口服小分子药物(2010-2021 年)的体外 Ki、人体体内药代动力学(PK)参数和治疗剂量。经典药物的数据来自 Goodman 和 Gilman 的教科书第 9 版(1996 年出版)。现代药物的 Ki(2.5 nM)和日剂量(88 μmol/天)均低于传统药物(33 nM 和 313 μmol/天),但其内在清除率(CLint;171 L/h 对 47 L/h)却高出 3.6 倍,这表明多年来药效的提高并没有带来预期的剂量减少。与固定靶受体占位率(tsor)方法相比,使用靶受体占位率(tsor)优化方法估算治疗剂量提高了估算的准确性(63%在观察值的10倍以内)。亚治疗剂量估算揭示了在 FIH 试验中超量用药的风险,表明这些估算并不一定像人们通常理解的那样保守。值得注意的是,非结合平均浓度与 Ki 的比率(Cave,u/Ki)因药物而异,并且与 Ki 呈负相关,这表明可能有必要将其纳入剂量估算方法中。本研究深入探讨了现代药物的体外Ki、体内PK参数和治疗剂量之间的关系,提出了高效力小分子药物时代剂量估算和药物开发的策略并揭示了其中的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
期刊最新文献
Inhibition of Tacrolimus Metabolism by Cannabidiol and Its Metabolites In Vitro A Randomized Hybrid-Effectiveness Trial Comparing Pharmacogenomics (PGx) to Standard Care: The PGx Applied to Chronic Pain Treatment in Primary Care (PGx-ACT) Trial AI In Action: Redefining Drug Discovery and Development Pharmacogenetic Information on Drug Labels of the Italian Agency of Medicines (AIFA): Actionability and Comparison Across Other Regulatory Agencies Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Piperaquine Dispersible Granules Formulation Under Fasting and Various Fed Conditions Versus Piperaquine Tablets When Fasted in Healthy Tanzanian Adults: A Randomized, Phase I Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1