Analysis of 73 Cases of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: Patient Selection is Key.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1089/lap.2024.0363
Elisabeth Megan Rose Baggus, Connor Henry-Blake, Benjamin Chrisp, Ashley Coope, Andrew Gregory, Raimundas Lunevicius
{"title":"Analysis of 73 Cases of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: Patient Selection is Key.","authors":"Elisabeth Megan Rose Baggus, Connor Henry-Blake, Benjamin Chrisp, Ashley Coope, Andrew Gregory, Raimundas Lunevicius","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) rates have substantially increased in England over the past two decades. However, its utilization and clinical outcomes at a local level are not well documented or understood. This study aimed to characterize the cohort of patients who underwent PC and resulting clinical outcomes at a tertiary center for hepatobiliary and emergency general surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a retrospective cohort study of patients treated between 2012 and 2020 at a single center. A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between Tokyo grade 2 and Tokyo grade 3 patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the 73-patient cohort, a 57.1% increase in PC was observed between 2012 and 2020. Compared to the gold-standard Tokyo guidelines, 36 patients (49.3%) met the criteria for PC. Postprocedural complications occurred in 50 patients (68.5%), including PC tube dysfunction (27.4%), intra-abdominal abscess (20.5%), external bile leak (8.2%), and biloma (5.5%). Recurrent biliary infection developed in 30 patients (41.1%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) underwent emergency reinterventions due to acute cholecystitis recurrence. Twenty patients (27.4%) required radiological reintervention. Seven patients (9.6%) required emergency cholecystectomy, and ten patients (13.7%) underwent an elective cholecystectomy. Overall, 36 patients (49.3%) died during the follow-up period. Five patients (6.8%) died during index admission. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher rate of complications in the Tokyo grade 3 subgroup of 82.8% vs. 59.1% (<i>P</i> = .04). Patients from this subgroup were also more likely to require emergency additional abscess drainage (17.2% vs. 2.3%, <i>P</i> = .034). There was no significant difference in the number of emergency cholecystectomies performed between groups. Patients from the Tokyo grade 2 subgroup were more likely to have an elective cholecystectomy in the future (20.5% vs. 3.4%, <i>P</i> = .044). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> PC was overperformed in our patient cohort, and was associated with high postprocedure morbidity and mortality. Clinicians should be discerning in patient selection criteria for PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) rates have substantially increased in England over the past two decades. However, its utilization and clinical outcomes at a local level are not well documented or understood. This study aimed to characterize the cohort of patients who underwent PC and resulting clinical outcomes at a tertiary center for hepatobiliary and emergency general surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients treated between 2012 and 2020 at a single center. A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between Tokyo grade 2 and Tokyo grade 3 patients. Results: In the 73-patient cohort, a 57.1% increase in PC was observed between 2012 and 2020. Compared to the gold-standard Tokyo guidelines, 36 patients (49.3%) met the criteria for PC. Postprocedural complications occurred in 50 patients (68.5%), including PC tube dysfunction (27.4%), intra-abdominal abscess (20.5%), external bile leak (8.2%), and biloma (5.5%). Recurrent biliary infection developed in 30 patients (41.1%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) underwent emergency reinterventions due to acute cholecystitis recurrence. Twenty patients (27.4%) required radiological reintervention. Seven patients (9.6%) required emergency cholecystectomy, and ten patients (13.7%) underwent an elective cholecystectomy. Overall, 36 patients (49.3%) died during the follow-up period. Five patients (6.8%) died during index admission. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher rate of complications in the Tokyo grade 3 subgroup of 82.8% vs. 59.1% (P = .04). Patients from this subgroup were also more likely to require emergency additional abscess drainage (17.2% vs. 2.3%, P = .034). There was no significant difference in the number of emergency cholecystectomies performed between groups. Patients from the Tokyo grade 2 subgroup were more likely to have an elective cholecystectomy in the future (20.5% vs. 3.4%, P = .044). Conclusions: PC was overperformed in our patient cohort, and was associated with high postprocedure morbidity and mortality. Clinicians should be discerning in patient selection criteria for PC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性胆囊炎经皮胆囊造口术 73 例分析:患者选择是关键
背景:过去二十年间,英国经皮胆囊造口术(PC)的使用率大幅提高。然而,当地对其使用情况和临床结果的记录和了解并不多。本研究旨在描述一家三级肝胆和急诊普外科中心接受经皮胆囊造口术的患者群体及其临床结果。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2012 年至 2020 年在一家中心接受治疗的患者。对东京2级和东京3级患者的预后进行了亚组分析比较。研究结果在 73 例患者队列中,2012 年至 2020 年间 PC 增加了 57.1%。与黄金标准东京指南相比,36 名患者(49.3%)符合 PC 标准。50名患者(68.5%)出现了术后并发症,包括PC管功能障碍(27.4%)、腹腔内脓肿(20.5%)、胆汁外漏(8.2%)和胆瘤(5.5%)。有 30 名患者(41.1%)出现复发性胆道感染。27名患者(37%)因急性胆囊炎复发而接受了紧急再介入治疗。20名患者(27.4%)需要进行放射科再介入治疗。七名患者(9.6%)需要进行急诊胆囊切除术,十名患者(13.7%)接受了择期胆囊切除术。在随访期间,共有 36 名患者(49.3%)死亡。5名患者(6.8%)在入院时死亡。亚组分析显示,东京 3 级亚组的并发症发生率较高,为 82.8% 对 59.1%(P = .04)。该亚组患者也更有可能需要紧急进行额外的脓肿引流(17.2% 对 2.3%,P = 0.034)。两组间急诊胆囊切除术的数量无明显差异。东京 2 级亚组患者将来更有可能接受择期胆囊切除术(20.5% 对 3.4%,P = .044)。结论:在我们的患者队列中,PC 术操作过度,术后发病率和死亡率较高。临床医生在选择 PC 患者标准时应擦亮眼睛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis with Machine Learning-Based Computer Tomography: Diagnostic Reliability and Role in Clinical Management. One Less: Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Facilitates Postoperative Opioid Avoidance. Does the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index Predict Adverse Outcomes after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? A Case-Control Study by the RIRSearch Group. Laparoscopy for Gastrointestinal Perforation in Neonates: A New Animal Model for Training. The Use of 8-mm Powered Articulation Endostapler for Sublobar Resection in Children. Preliminary Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1