{"title":"Improving Executive Function in Children and Adolescents with Cognitive-Engaging Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Gesi Teng, Haishuo Xia, Qing Li, Antao Chen","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Executive function (EF) development is vital for children and adolescents, with physical activity (PA) playing a key role in its enhancement. Through a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis, this study investigates the effectiveness of cognitively engaging physical activity (CEPA) over traditional PA in fostering EF in children and adolescents. The research involved 1671 participants across 15 studies to determine if CEPA is superior to PA in enhancing EF and to analyze interventions and dose-response effects. Results demonstrated that CEPA had a more pronounced impact on EF development compared with PA, with a Hedges' g of 0.50 (95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.48), although potentially overestimated due to small-study effects and publication bias. Subgroup analyses did not find notable differences in effectiveness among various intervention types. The most substantial effect was observed with 45-minute interventions, while frequencies less than twice weekly and durations beyond 12 weeks were less effective. These findings suggest that CEPA could be a more efficacious method for advancing EF in youth, indicating a need for larger-scale randomized controlled trial (RCTs) to confirm the results and more accurately estimate their magnitude.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Executive function (EF) development is vital for children and adolescents, with physical activity (PA) playing a key role in its enhancement. Through a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis, this study investigates the effectiveness of cognitively engaging physical activity (CEPA) over traditional PA in fostering EF in children and adolescents. The research involved 1671 participants across 15 studies to determine if CEPA is superior to PA in enhancing EF and to analyze interventions and dose-response effects. Results demonstrated that CEPA had a more pronounced impact on EF development compared with PA, with a Hedges' g of 0.50 (95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.48), although potentially overestimated due to small-study effects and publication bias. Subgroup analyses did not find notable differences in effectiveness among various intervention types. The most substantial effect was observed with 45-minute interventions, while frequencies less than twice weekly and durations beyond 12 weeks were less effective. These findings suggest that CEPA could be a more efficacious method for advancing EF in youth, indicating a need for larger-scale randomized controlled trial (RCTs) to confirm the results and more accurately estimate their magnitude.
摘要:执行功能(EF)的发展对儿童和青少年至关重要,而体育活动(PA)在增强执行功能方面发挥着关键作用。本研究通过系统回顾和多层次荟萃分析,探讨了认知参与型体育活动(CEPA)与传统体育活动相比,在促进儿童和青少年执行力发展方面的有效性。这项研究涉及 15 项研究的 1671 名参与者,以确定 CEPA 在提高 EF 方面是否优于 PA,并分析干预措施和剂量反应效应。结果表明,CEPA 与 PA 相比,对 EF 发展的影响更明显,Hedges' g 为 0.50(95% 置信区间,0.10-0.48),但由于小规模研究效应和发表偏差,CEPA 有可能被高估。分组分析没有发现各种干预类型的效果有明显差异。45分钟的干预效果最显著,而每周少于两次的频率和超过12周的时间则效果较差。这些研究结果表明,CEPA可能是提高青少年心肺功能的一种更有效的方法,这表明需要进行更大规模的随机对照试验(RCT)来证实这些结果,并更准确地估计其幅度。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.