Health Care Providers' Attitudes and Knowledge Related to Tic Disorder Identification and Treatment.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1097/DBP.0000000000001345
Kim Newsome, Helena J Hutchins, Rebecca H Bitsko, Lara R Robinson, Samuel M Katz, Nneoma Uba, Karyl T Rattay
{"title":"Health Care Providers' Attitudes and Knowledge Related to Tic Disorder Identification and Treatment.","authors":"Kim Newsome, Helena J Hutchins, Rebecca H Bitsko, Lara R Robinson, Samuel M Katz, Nneoma Uba, Karyl T Rattay","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study assessed child-serving health care providers' attitudes and knowledge related to identification and treatment of tic disorders including Tourette syndrome (TS), among children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2022 Fall DocStyles, a web-based survey of health care providers. The analytic sample included 1058 child-serving providers (403 family practitioners, 232 internists, 251 pediatricians, and 172 nurse practitioners or physician assistants). We calculated point prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals and used χ2 tests to statistically test differences by provider type and metro status of practice setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Less than two-thirds of providers (62.4%) considered evaluation of tics as their role, less than half (40.8%) considered diagnosis of tic disorders their role, and around one-fourth considered treatment of patients with tic disorders to be their role (27.3%). Lack of knowledge of tics/TS and lack of comfort evaluating patients for tics and tic disorders were the most often reported barriers to identification and diagnosis for most provider types, and across practice metro status categories. Online training was the most preferred source of information about tics and tic disorders overall and for each provider type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support previous reports indicating challenges in health care provider comfort and knowledge in identifying and diagnosing tic disorders, and the need for more education opportunities around evaluation and diagnosis. Communication and training to support the needs of child-serving providers could improve the access to care for children with tics and tic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our study assessed child-serving health care providers' attitudes and knowledge related to identification and treatment of tic disorders including Tourette syndrome (TS), among children.

Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2022 Fall DocStyles, a web-based survey of health care providers. The analytic sample included 1058 child-serving providers (403 family practitioners, 232 internists, 251 pediatricians, and 172 nurse practitioners or physician assistants). We calculated point prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals and used χ2 tests to statistically test differences by provider type and metro status of practice setting.

Results: Less than two-thirds of providers (62.4%) considered evaluation of tics as their role, less than half (40.8%) considered diagnosis of tic disorders their role, and around one-fourth considered treatment of patients with tic disorders to be their role (27.3%). Lack of knowledge of tics/TS and lack of comfort evaluating patients for tics and tic disorders were the most often reported barriers to identification and diagnosis for most provider types, and across practice metro status categories. Online training was the most preferred source of information about tics and tic disorders overall and for each provider type.

Conclusion: These findings support previous reports indicating challenges in health care provider comfort and knowledge in identifying and diagnosing tic disorders, and the need for more education opportunities around evaluation and diagnosis. Communication and training to support the needs of child-serving providers could improve the access to care for children with tics and tic disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员对抽动障碍鉴别与治疗的态度与知识。
目的:本研究评估儿童服务卫生保健提供者对抽动障碍(包括抽动秽语综合征(TS))的识别和治疗的态度和知识。方法:我们分析了2022年秋季医生风格的横断面数据,这是一项基于网络的卫生保健提供者调查。分析样本包括1058名儿童服务提供者(403名家庭医生、232名内科医生、251名儿科医生和172名执业护士或医师助理)。我们计算了点患病率估计值和95%置信区间,并使用χ2检验统计检验不同提供者类型和大都市状态的执业环境的差异。结果:不到三分之二(62.4%)的医生认为抽动的评估是他们的职责,不到一半(40.8%)的医生认为抽动障碍的诊断是他们的职责,大约四分之一的医生认为抽动障碍患者的治疗是他们的职责(27.3%)。缺乏对抽动/TS的了解和缺乏对抽动和抽动障碍患者的舒适评估是大多数提供者类型和跨实践地铁状态类别中最常报道的识别和诊断障碍。在线培训是关于抽动和抽动障碍的最受欢迎的信息来源。结论:这些发现支持了先前的报告,表明卫生保健提供者在识别和诊断抽动障碍方面的舒适度和知识存在挑战,需要更多的评估和诊断教育机会。为满足儿童服务提供者的需求而进行的沟通和培训,可以改善患有抽动症和抽动障碍的儿童获得护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
期刊最新文献
Health Care Providers' Attitudes and Knowledge Related to Tic Disorder Identification and Treatment. Improving Resident Physician History and Physical in Challenging Situations. Navigating the Pandemic: A Call for Deeper Insights on Disabilities and Social Determinants. Neurodevelopmental and Mental Health Outcomes in a National Clinical Sample of Youth With Sex Chromosome Trisomies Compared With Matched Controls. Parents' Experiences and Views About Use of Wearable Technology for Research and Treatment Monitoring of Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1