Association of early general anesthesia with outcome in adults with status epilepticus: A propensity-matched observational study

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1111/epi.18203
Isabelle Beuchat, Jan Novy, Vincent Alvarez, Felix Rosenow, Christoph Kellinghaus, Stephan Rüegg, Christian Tilz, Eugen Trinka, Iris Unterberger, Zeljko Uzelac, Adam Strzelczyk, Andrea O. Rossetti
{"title":"Association of early general anesthesia with outcome in adults with status epilepticus: A propensity-matched observational study","authors":"Isabelle Beuchat,&nbsp;Jan Novy,&nbsp;Vincent Alvarez,&nbsp;Felix Rosenow,&nbsp;Christoph Kellinghaus,&nbsp;Stephan Rüegg,&nbsp;Christian Tilz,&nbsp;Eugen Trinka,&nbsp;Iris Unterberger,&nbsp;Zeljko Uzelac,&nbsp;Adam Strzelczyk,&nbsp;Andrea O. Rossetti","doi":"10.1111/epi.18203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>General anesthesia (GA) earlier than recommended (as first- or second-line treatment) was recently described to improve status epilepticus (SE) outcome. We aimed to assess the impact of early GA on outcome in matched groups. Data from a multicenter, prospective cohort of 1179 SE episodes in 1049 adults were retrospectively analyzed. Incident SE episodes were categorized as “early anesthesia” (eGA; GA as first- or second-line treatment) or “non-early anesthesia” (neGA; GA after second-line treatment or not at all). Using propensity score matching, eGA episodes were paired 1:4 with neGA episodes. We assessed survival, functional outcomes at discharge (good: modified Rankin Scale = 0–2 or no worsening), SE cessation rate, SE duration, and hospital stay. Among 1049 SE episodes, 55 (5.2%) received eGA, and 994 constituted the neGA group; 220 represented the matched controls. Patients receiving eGA were younger (median = 63, interquartile range [IQR] = 56–76 vs. median = 70, IQR = 54–80 years, <i>p</i> = .004), had deeper consciousness impairment (80% vs. 40% stuporous/comatose, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), and had more severe SE forms (89% vs. 54% generalized convulsive SE/nonconvulsive SE in coma, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Mortality, functional outcome, SE cessation rate, and duration of SE and hospital stay were similar between the eGA group and matched controls. We conclude that early anesthesia for SE treatment did not influence prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"66 1","pages":"e7-e13"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

General anesthesia (GA) earlier than recommended (as first- or second-line treatment) was recently described to improve status epilepticus (SE) outcome. We aimed to assess the impact of early GA on outcome in matched groups. Data from a multicenter, prospective cohort of 1179 SE episodes in 1049 adults were retrospectively analyzed. Incident SE episodes were categorized as “early anesthesia” (eGA; GA as first- or second-line treatment) or “non-early anesthesia” (neGA; GA after second-line treatment or not at all). Using propensity score matching, eGA episodes were paired 1:4 with neGA episodes. We assessed survival, functional outcomes at discharge (good: modified Rankin Scale = 0–2 or no worsening), SE cessation rate, SE duration, and hospital stay. Among 1049 SE episodes, 55 (5.2%) received eGA, and 994 constituted the neGA group; 220 represented the matched controls. Patients receiving eGA were younger (median = 63, interquartile range [IQR] = 56–76 vs. median = 70, IQR = 54–80 years, p = .004), had deeper consciousness impairment (80% vs. 40% stuporous/comatose, p < .001), and had more severe SE forms (89% vs. 54% generalized convulsive SE/nonconvulsive SE in coma, p < .001). Mortality, functional outcome, SE cessation rate, and duration of SE and hospital stay were similar between the eGA group and matched controls. We conclude that early anesthesia for SE treatment did not influence prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人癫痫状态患者早期全身麻醉与预后的关系:倾向匹配观察研究。
最近有报道称,早于推荐时间(作为一线或二线治疗)进行全身麻醉(GA)可改善癫痫状态(SE)的预后。我们的目的是评估早期全身麻醉对匹配组预后的影响。我们对一个多中心前瞻性队列中 1049 名成人的 1179 次 SE 病例数据进行了回顾性分析。SE 事件被分为 "早期麻醉"(eGA;GA 作为一线或二线治疗)或 "非早期麻醉"(neGA;GA 在二线治疗后或根本没有)。通过倾向评分匹配,eGA 与 neGA 的配对比例为 1:4。我们评估了患者的存活率、出院时的功能预后(良好:改良Rankin量表=0-2或无恶化)、SE停止率、SE持续时间和住院时间。在 1049 例 SE 中,55 例(5.2%)接受了 eGA,994 例构成 neGA 组;220 例为匹配对照组。接受 eGA 的患者更年轻(中位数 = 63 岁,四分位数间距 [IQR] = 56-76 岁 vs. 中位数 = 70 岁,四分位数间距 [IQR] = 54-80 岁,p = .004),意识障碍程度更深(80% vs. 40% 昏迷/昏迷,p = .004)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Vagus nerve stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Twenty-four-month data and experience from the CORE-VNS study. Neural mass modeling reveals that hyperexcitability underpins slow-wave sleep changes in children with epilepsy. The role of electroencephalography in epilepsy research-From seizures to interictal activity and comorbidities. Risk of epilepsy following first unprovoked and acute seizures: Cohort study. Evolution in the prescription and cost of non-intravenous rescue benzodiazepines for the treatment of seizure emergencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1