{"title":"Assessment of digital economy development with the new multicriteria sorting method: DCMSort","authors":"Yingying Liang , Jindong Qin , Alessio Ishizaka","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We present a novel multiple criteria sorting method based on the deck of cards method, named DCMSort, which assigns alternatives to pre-defined and ordered classes. In contrast to prior multiple criteria sorting methods, DCMSort produces criteria weights and utility functions based on personalized preferences using comparisons between two consecutive levels. Meanwhile, it needs fewer comparisons with the aid of the ordinal relation. To improve the flexibility of preference representation, we adopt reference levels and representative profiles as auxiliary profiles to characterize the utility function finely. Additionally, this method permits both definite and uncertain number of blank cards between consecutive positions. To verify the practicality of DCMSort, we provide an illustrative case study in the domain of digital economy development assessment in China. Sensitivity and comparative analyses are conducted to demonstrate the stability and superiority of our proposal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 103224"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We present a novel multiple criteria sorting method based on the deck of cards method, named DCMSort, which assigns alternatives to pre-defined and ordered classes. In contrast to prior multiple criteria sorting methods, DCMSort produces criteria weights and utility functions based on personalized preferences using comparisons between two consecutive levels. Meanwhile, it needs fewer comparisons with the aid of the ordinal relation. To improve the flexibility of preference representation, we adopt reference levels and representative profiles as auxiliary profiles to characterize the utility function finely. Additionally, this method permits both definite and uncertain number of blank cards between consecutive positions. To verify the practicality of DCMSort, we provide an illustrative case study in the domain of digital economy development assessment in China. Sensitivity and comparative analyses are conducted to demonstrate the stability and superiority of our proposal.
我们提出了一种新的基于deck of cards方法的多准则排序方法,称为DCMSort,它为预定义的有序类分配备选项。与之前的多标准排序方法相比,DCMSort使用两个连续级别之间的比较,根据个性化偏好生成标准权重和效用函数。同时,借助序数关系,它需要较少的比较。为了提高偏好表示的灵活性,我们采用参考水平和代表性轮廓作为辅助轮廓来精细地表征效用函数。此外,这种方法允许在连续位置之间有确定数量和不确定数量的空白卡片。为了验证DCMSort的实用性,我们在中国数字经济发展评估领域提供了一个示范性案例研究。通过敏感性分析和对比分析,证明了该方案的稳定性和优越性。
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.