Chen Zhu , Xiaoguang Cai , Yurun Li , Sihan Li , Xin Huang , Honglu Xu
{"title":"Study of the performance of a 3D modular geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutment under overloading","authors":"Chen Zhu , Xiaoguang Cai , Yurun Li , Sihan Li , Xin Huang , Honglu Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to investigate the response characteristics of three-dimensional geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments subjected to overload conditions in terms of deformation, soil stresses, and reinforcement strains. To this end, a 1:2 scale model of a GRS bridge abutment was constructed and subjected to a detailed analysis when the vertical load was increased in incremental steps. The results showed that the GRS abutment performed well and did not reach the plastic state at six times the service limit state (SLS) load. The settlement at the top of the abutment increases with increasing load, and the settlement results in the central bulging of both the front and wing walls, which is inconsistent with the assumption of plane strain. Therefore, a novel three-dimensional facing displacement model that outperforms traditional calculation methods is presented. The incremental vertical soil stresses in the center of the abutment increased significantly, and the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) method better predicted the vertical soil stresses on the GRS bridge abutments under SLS loads; however, this method underestimates the incremental vertical soil stresses under overloads. The maximum reinforcement strain occurred in the middle of the abutment, and the deformation of the reinforcement was not uniform under overload, indicating that an overload may lead to the destruction of the reinforcement under the beam seat. The results of this study can serve as a reference for the design and application of GRS bridge abutments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 101451"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224002721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the response characteristics of three-dimensional geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments subjected to overload conditions in terms of deformation, soil stresses, and reinforcement strains. To this end, a 1:2 scale model of a GRS bridge abutment was constructed and subjected to a detailed analysis when the vertical load was increased in incremental steps. The results showed that the GRS abutment performed well and did not reach the plastic state at six times the service limit state (SLS) load. The settlement at the top of the abutment increases with increasing load, and the settlement results in the central bulging of both the front and wing walls, which is inconsistent with the assumption of plane strain. Therefore, a novel three-dimensional facing displacement model that outperforms traditional calculation methods is presented. The incremental vertical soil stresses in the center of the abutment increased significantly, and the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) method better predicted the vertical soil stresses on the GRS bridge abutments under SLS loads; however, this method underestimates the incremental vertical soil stresses under overloads. The maximum reinforcement strain occurred in the middle of the abutment, and the deformation of the reinforcement was not uniform under overload, indicating that an overload may lead to the destruction of the reinforcement under the beam seat. The results of this study can serve as a reference for the design and application of GRS bridge abutments.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.