Study of the performance of a 3D modular geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutment under overloading

IF 5.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Geotechnics Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101451
Chen Zhu , Xiaoguang Cai , Yurun Li , Sihan Li , Xin Huang , Honglu Xu
{"title":"Study of the performance of a 3D modular geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutment under overloading","authors":"Chen Zhu ,&nbsp;Xiaoguang Cai ,&nbsp;Yurun Li ,&nbsp;Sihan Li ,&nbsp;Xin Huang ,&nbsp;Honglu Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to investigate the response characteristics of three-dimensional geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments subjected to overload conditions in terms of deformation, soil stresses, and reinforcement strains. To this end, a 1:2 scale model of a GRS bridge abutment was constructed and subjected to a detailed analysis when the vertical load was increased in incremental steps. The results showed that the GRS abutment performed well and did not reach the plastic state at six times the service limit state (SLS) load. The settlement at the top of the abutment increases with increasing load, and the settlement results in the central bulging of both the front and wing walls, which is inconsistent with the assumption of plane strain. Therefore, a novel three-dimensional facing displacement model that outperforms traditional calculation methods is presented. The incremental vertical soil stresses in the center of the abutment increased significantly, and the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) method better predicted the vertical soil stresses on the GRS bridge abutments under SLS loads; however, this method underestimates the incremental vertical soil stresses under overloads. The maximum reinforcement strain occurred in the middle of the abutment, and the deformation of the reinforcement was not uniform under overload, indicating that an overload may lead to the destruction of the reinforcement under the beam seat. The results of this study can serve as a reference for the design and application of GRS bridge abutments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 101451"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224002721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the response characteristics of three-dimensional geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments subjected to overload conditions in terms of deformation, soil stresses, and reinforcement strains. To this end, a 1:2 scale model of a GRS bridge abutment was constructed and subjected to a detailed analysis when the vertical load was increased in incremental steps. The results showed that the GRS abutment performed well and did not reach the plastic state at six times the service limit state (SLS) load. The settlement at the top of the abutment increases with increasing load, and the settlement results in the central bulging of both the front and wing walls, which is inconsistent with the assumption of plane strain. Therefore, a novel three-dimensional facing displacement model that outperforms traditional calculation methods is presented. The incremental vertical soil stresses in the center of the abutment increased significantly, and the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) method better predicted the vertical soil stresses on the GRS bridge abutments under SLS loads; however, this method underestimates the incremental vertical soil stresses under overloads. The maximum reinforcement strain occurred in the middle of the abutment, and the deformation of the reinforcement was not uniform under overload, indicating that an overload may lead to the destruction of the reinforcement under the beam seat. The results of this study can serve as a reference for the design and application of GRS bridge abutments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维组合式土工合成材料加筋土桥梁桥台超载性能研究
本研究的目的是研究三维土工合成加筋土(GRS)桥台在超载条件下的变形、土应力和钢筋应变的响应特征。为此,构建了一个1:2比例的GRS桥台模型,并对竖向荷载逐级增加的情况进行了详细分析。结果表明:在6倍于使用极限状态(SLS)荷载作用下,GRS桥台性能良好,未达到塑性状态;桥台顶部沉降随荷载的增大而增大,沉降导致桥台前壁和翼壁均出现中心胀形,这与平面应变假设不一致。为此,提出了一种优于传统计算方法的三维面位移模型。桥台中心竖向土应力增量显著增大,美国联邦公路管理局(FHWA)方法较好地预测了SLS荷载作用下GRS桥台的竖向土应力;然而,这种方法低估了超载作用下土壤垂直应力增量。最大钢筋应变发生在桥台中部,超载作用下钢筋变形不均匀,说明超载可能导致梁座下钢筋破坏。研究结果可为GRS桥台的设计和应用提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Geotechnics
Transportation Geotechnics Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.
期刊最新文献
Genetic programming-based closed-form solutions for predicting the compressive strength of cement-treated soils Hydro-mechanical responses of irregular twin tunnels with unequal burial depths in anisotropic soil layer Distribution and evolution of distress in embankment-bridge transition sections of the Gonghe–Yushu Expressway in degrading permafrost regions X-ray CT-based investigation of mesoscopic pore structure and macro-meso coupled damage model for anisotropic lean clay under a freeze–thaw cycle A framework for mitigating boundary effects in transportation embankment seismic analysis: shaking table tests and numerical simulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1