Land dedications as local government requirement for open space: Results from US surveys of cities

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105625
Agustin Leon-Moreta
{"title":"Land dedications as local government requirement for open space: Results from US surveys of cities","authors":"Agustin Leon-Moreta","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dedication of land is a regulatory condition that cities can require to approve development projects. Land dedication, though, does not simply regulate development; it allows a city to preserve undeveloped land. City officials increasingly require developers to dedicate land for open space preservation. The present research focuses on land dedication due to its promise in extending human access to open space in developing cities. City officials nonetheless need regulatory capacity to compel developers to set aside lands. This research uses pooled municipal-level data to examine the likelihood of US cities requiring land dedication as a precondition of development approval. Dedication requirements differ considerably across cities. The analysis tests for the impact of income inequality, conservancy interests, the presence of easements, and a city's time from incorporation. Existing literature has yet to substantiate whether these mechanisms specifically affect the feasibility of land dedication. Depending on the model's specification, conservancy interests are partially or not significant. The presence of easements is partially significant on land dedication requirements. Income inequality is statistically significant in most models. A city's time of incorporation is generally significant across the specified models. The research theoretically connects social preferences for land use with organized interests in land conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 105625"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124008394","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dedication of land is a regulatory condition that cities can require to approve development projects. Land dedication, though, does not simply regulate development; it allows a city to preserve undeveloped land. City officials increasingly require developers to dedicate land for open space preservation. The present research focuses on land dedication due to its promise in extending human access to open space in developing cities. City officials nonetheless need regulatory capacity to compel developers to set aside lands. This research uses pooled municipal-level data to examine the likelihood of US cities requiring land dedication as a precondition of development approval. Dedication requirements differ considerably across cities. The analysis tests for the impact of income inequality, conservancy interests, the presence of easements, and a city's time from incorporation. Existing literature has yet to substantiate whether these mechanisms specifically affect the feasibility of land dedication. Depending on the model's specification, conservancy interests are partially or not significant. The presence of easements is partially significant on land dedication requirements. Income inequality is statistically significant in most models. A city's time of incorporation is generally significant across the specified models. The research theoretically connects social preferences for land use with organized interests in land conservation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土地专用作为地方政府对开放空间的要求:来自美国城市调查的结果
土地用途是城市批准开发项目的一个监管条件。然而,土地奉献并不是简单地规范开发;它允许城市保护未开发的土地。市政官员越来越多地要求开发商将土地用于开放空间保护。目前的研究重点是土地奉献,因为它有望在发展中城市扩大人类进入开放空间的机会。尽管如此,市政官员仍需要监管能力来迫使开发商留出土地。本研究使用汇总的市级数据来检验美国城市要求土地奉献作为开发批准先决条件的可能性。不同城市的奉献要求差别很大。分析测试了收入不平等、保护利益、地役权存在和城市成立时间的影响。现有文献尚未证实这些机制是否具体影响土地奉献的可行性。根据模型的规格,保护利益是部分或不重要的。地役权的存在在一定程度上对土地专用要求具有重要意义。在大多数模型中,收入不平等在统计上是显著的。在指定的模型中,城市的成立时间通常是重要的。该研究从理论上将土地利用的社会偏好与土地保护的有组织利益联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
Industrial park planning from the perspective of productive service industries: based on the mechanism of “form-flow synthesis” From the 15-minute city to the 15-minute university: A new paradigm for university campuses Unpacking housing welfare expansion in China: Internal motives, external pressures, and the adoption of inclusive public rental housing policies Assessment of simultaneous accessibility walking index (SAWI) to essential opportunities Human thermal comfort and mortality: the Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) index applied to the detection of non-accidental deaths in the state of São Paulo, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1