Javier Zurriaga Carda , Carmen María Antolinos-Turpin , Joaquín Ródenas-Rochina , Lara Milián , Julia Pla-Salom , Zakaria Oguir , María Sancho-Tello , Manuel Mata , Carmen Carda , Gloria Gallego-Ferrer , José Luis Gómez Ribelles
{"title":"Articular cartilage regeneration with a microgel as a support biomaterial. A rabbit knee model","authors":"Javier Zurriaga Carda , Carmen María Antolinos-Turpin , Joaquín Ródenas-Rochina , Lara Milián , Julia Pla-Salom , Zakaria Oguir , María Sancho-Tello , Manuel Mata , Carmen Carda , Gloria Gallego-Ferrer , José Luis Gómez Ribelles","doi":"10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Articular cartilage has limited regenerative capacity, so focal lesions generate mechanical stress in the joint that induces an aggravation of the damage, which ultimately leads to osteoarthritis. We recently suggested the use of microgels at the site of the cartilage defect, as a support material, to generate a biomechanical environment where pluripotent cells differentiate towards the hyaline cartilage phenotype. Here we propose a chondral regeneration strategy based on subchondral bone injury, and filling the defect site with an agglomerate of two types of microspheres, some rigid made of a biodegradable polyester (40 μm mean diameter), and others with a gel consistency made of platelet-rich plasma obtained from circulating blood (70–110 μm diameter). A 3-mm diameter defect was made in the articular cartilage of the knee joint in rabbits, exposing the subchondral bone, in which incisions were made to produce bleeding. Microgels were implanted filling the defect, which was covered with a synthetic membrane of the same polyester. Three months later, cartilage regeneration was analyzed according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) guidelines. The newly formed tissue showed histological characteristics of hyaline cartilage, being significantly closer to native cartilage than when only the membrane was implanted, mainly in parameters such as tissue (70.0 ± 20.9) and cell morphologies (100.0 ± 0.0), and surface architecture (90.0 ± 22.4) and assessment (70.0 ± 11.2), with native tissue having a value of 100. Polyester microspheres and membrane were not bioreabsorbed during the three months, but rather moved towards the subchondral bone, leaving space for the organization of the newly formed tissue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51111,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 214125"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950824003686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Articular cartilage has limited regenerative capacity, so focal lesions generate mechanical stress in the joint that induces an aggravation of the damage, which ultimately leads to osteoarthritis. We recently suggested the use of microgels at the site of the cartilage defect, as a support material, to generate a biomechanical environment where pluripotent cells differentiate towards the hyaline cartilage phenotype. Here we propose a chondral regeneration strategy based on subchondral bone injury, and filling the defect site with an agglomerate of two types of microspheres, some rigid made of a biodegradable polyester (40 μm mean diameter), and others with a gel consistency made of platelet-rich plasma obtained from circulating blood (70–110 μm diameter). A 3-mm diameter defect was made in the articular cartilage of the knee joint in rabbits, exposing the subchondral bone, in which incisions were made to produce bleeding. Microgels were implanted filling the defect, which was covered with a synthetic membrane of the same polyester. Three months later, cartilage regeneration was analyzed according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) guidelines. The newly formed tissue showed histological characteristics of hyaline cartilage, being significantly closer to native cartilage than when only the membrane was implanted, mainly in parameters such as tissue (70.0 ± 20.9) and cell morphologies (100.0 ± 0.0), and surface architecture (90.0 ± 22.4) and assessment (70.0 ± 11.2), with native tissue having a value of 100. Polyester microspheres and membrane were not bioreabsorbed during the three months, but rather moved towards the subchondral bone, leaving space for the organization of the newly formed tissue.
期刊介绍:
Biomaterials Advances, previously known as Materials Science and Engineering: C-Materials for Biological Applications (P-ISSN: 0928-4931, E-ISSN: 1873-0191). Includes topics at the interface of the biomedical sciences and materials engineering. These topics include:
• Bioinspired and biomimetic materials for medical applications
• Materials of biological origin for medical applications
• Materials for "active" medical applications
• Self-assembling and self-healing materials for medical applications
• "Smart" (i.e., stimulus-response) materials for medical applications
• Ceramic, metallic, polymeric, and composite materials for medical applications
• Materials for in vivo sensing
• Materials for in vivo imaging
• Materials for delivery of pharmacologic agents and vaccines
• Novel approaches for characterizing and modeling materials for medical applications
Manuscripts on biological topics without a materials science component, or manuscripts on materials science without biological applications, will not be considered for publication in Materials Science and Engineering C. New submissions are first assessed for language, scope and originality (plagiarism check) and can be desk rejected before review if they need English language improvements, are out of scope or present excessive duplication with published sources.
Biomaterials Advances sits within Elsevier''s biomaterials science portfolio alongside Biomaterials, Materials Today Bio and Biomaterials and Biosystems. As part of the broader Materials Today family, Biomaterials Advances offers authors rigorous peer review, rapid decisions, and high visibility. We look forward to receiving your submissions!