Caroline R. Hill , Armaghan Shafaei , Mary C. Boyce , Liezhou Zhong , Lois Balmer , Joshua R. Lewis , Jonathan M. Hodgson , Lauren C. Blekkenhorst
{"title":"S-methyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide and glucosinolate levels in Australian-sourced Brassica vegetables before and after domestic cooking","authors":"Caroline R. Hill , Armaghan Shafaei , Mary C. Boyce , Liezhou Zhong , Lois Balmer , Joshua R. Lewis , Jonathan M. Hodgson , Lauren C. Blekkenhorst","doi":"10.1016/j.jfca.2024.107015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Currently no data exists on <em>S</em>-methyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide (SMCSO) levels in Australian-sourced vegetables and limited data exists for glucosinolates. The effect of various cooking methods on the retention of SMCSO and glucosinolates in Australian-sourced vegetables is also limited. This study measured SMCSO and ten glucosinolates in a selection of Australian-sourced <em>Brassica</em> vegetables, both raw and after steaming. We additionally measured SMCSO and glucosinolate levels in broccoli after microwaving, stir-frying and boiling. SMCSO contributed greater dry weight (0.6–1.9 %) than total glucosinolates combined (0.3–1.2 %) in these raw cruciferous vegetables. SMCSO levels from highest to lowest were: Brussels sprouts > broccoli > red cabbage > kale > cauliflower > white cabbage > Chinese cabbage; and glucosinolate levels were: Brussels sprouts > white cabbage > broccoli > kale > red cabbage > Chinese cabbage > cauliflower. Both SMCSO and the ten main glucosinolates quantified were relatively stable after light steaming across all vegetables measured, and after microwaving broccoli. Boiling and stir-frying broccoli led to significant losses in SMCSO and the two dominant glucosinolates, glucoraphanin and glucobrassicin (all <em>p</em> < 0.05). Mild steaming and/or microwaving were preferable in retaining SMCSO and glucosinolates, whilst boiling and stir-frying were least favorable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 107015"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157524010494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Currently no data exists on S-methyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide (SMCSO) levels in Australian-sourced vegetables and limited data exists for glucosinolates. The effect of various cooking methods on the retention of SMCSO and glucosinolates in Australian-sourced vegetables is also limited. This study measured SMCSO and ten glucosinolates in a selection of Australian-sourced Brassica vegetables, both raw and after steaming. We additionally measured SMCSO and glucosinolate levels in broccoli after microwaving, stir-frying and boiling. SMCSO contributed greater dry weight (0.6–1.9 %) than total glucosinolates combined (0.3–1.2 %) in these raw cruciferous vegetables. SMCSO levels from highest to lowest were: Brussels sprouts > broccoli > red cabbage > kale > cauliflower > white cabbage > Chinese cabbage; and glucosinolate levels were: Brussels sprouts > white cabbage > broccoli > kale > red cabbage > Chinese cabbage > cauliflower. Both SMCSO and the ten main glucosinolates quantified were relatively stable after light steaming across all vegetables measured, and after microwaving broccoli. Boiling and stir-frying broccoli led to significant losses in SMCSO and the two dominant glucosinolates, glucoraphanin and glucobrassicin (all p < 0.05). Mild steaming and/or microwaving were preferable in retaining SMCSO and glucosinolates, whilst boiling and stir-frying were least favorable.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Composition and Analysis publishes manuscripts on scientific aspects of data on the chemical composition of human foods, with particular emphasis on actual data on composition of foods; analytical methods; studies on the manipulation, storage, distribution and use of food composition data; and studies on the statistics, use and distribution of such data and data systems. The Journal''s basis is nutrient composition, with increasing emphasis on bioactive non-nutrient and anti-nutrient components. Papers must provide sufficient description of the food samples, analytical methods, quality control procedures and statistical treatments of the data to permit the end users of the food composition data to evaluate the appropriateness of such data in their projects.
The Journal does not publish papers on: microbiological compounds; sensory quality; aromatics/volatiles in food and wine; essential oils; organoleptic characteristics of food; physical properties; or clinical papers and pharmacology-related papers.