How does viewing food products in 2D or 3D affect consumer evaluations?

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105382
Kazuna Tonooka , Reo Sato , Kosuke Motoki , Shin-ichi Ishikawa
{"title":"How does viewing food products in 2D or 3D affect consumer evaluations?","authors":"Kazuna Tonooka ,&nbsp;Reo Sato ,&nbsp;Kosuke Motoki ,&nbsp;Shin-ichi Ishikawa","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the influence of changes in visual information (2D vs. 3D) and product characteristics (healthy vs. unhealthy) on consumer purchase intention, expected satiety, and expected volume with regard to food products. The participants were asked to answer a questionnaire for each food sample displayed in 2D or 3D. The results reveal that the 3D food model has significantly higher scores for expected volume and satiety than does the 2D model, along with a significant interaction between visual information and product characteristics. For healthy foods, the expected volume, expected satiety, and purchase intention were significantly higher in the 2D than in the 3D model. For unhealthy foods, scores for the three variables were significantly higher in the 3D than in the 2D food model. This indicates an inverse relationship based on the healthiness of the food product. The study posits that changing the visual information from 2D to 3D strengthened the image of healthy and unhealthy foods as having low and high volumes, respectively, resulting in a more favorable purchase intention. The results of this study advance our understanding of the applicability of different image types when promoting food products, thereby enabling and guiding well-informed decisions of online retailers and other stakeholders in the design of food products for advertisements and other purposes in the food service industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 105382"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the influence of changes in visual information (2D vs. 3D) and product characteristics (healthy vs. unhealthy) on consumer purchase intention, expected satiety, and expected volume with regard to food products. The participants were asked to answer a questionnaire for each food sample displayed in 2D or 3D. The results reveal that the 3D food model has significantly higher scores for expected volume and satiety than does the 2D model, along with a significant interaction between visual information and product characteristics. For healthy foods, the expected volume, expected satiety, and purchase intention were significantly higher in the 2D than in the 3D model. For unhealthy foods, scores for the three variables were significantly higher in the 3D than in the 2D food model. This indicates an inverse relationship based on the healthiness of the food product. The study posits that changing the visual information from 2D to 3D strengthened the image of healthy and unhealthy foods as having low and high volumes, respectively, resulting in a more favorable purchase intention. The results of this study advance our understanding of the applicability of different image types when promoting food products, thereby enabling and guiding well-informed decisions of online retailers and other stakeholders in the design of food products for advertisements and other purposes in the food service industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of motherhood on energy intake and macronutrient choice: A comparative study How does viewing food products in 2D or 3D affect consumer evaluations? Dip increases eating rate and promotes greater intake even when energy density is reduced Meat alternative consumers still frowned upon in Europe: Analysis of stereotypical, emotional and behavioral responses of observing others The role of nutrition background on motivations, barriers, and adherence to a vegan diet: A qualitative study of the vegan eating habits and nutritional evaluation survey (VEGAN-EatS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1