Influence of the breed and litter breed composition on the growth, survival, and health of rabbits

A. Bigot, D. Savietto, S. Combes, L. Fortun-Lamothe, M. Gunia
{"title":"Influence of the breed and litter breed composition on the growth, survival, and health of rabbits","authors":"A. Bigot,&nbsp;D. Savietto,&nbsp;S. Combes,&nbsp;L. Fortun-Lamothe,&nbsp;M. Gunia","doi":"10.1016/j.anopes.2024.100083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of the breed and the litter breed composition on the growth, survival, and health of rabbits. Two genetic types were compared: purebred INRA 1777 (<strong>INRA</strong>) and crossbreed ¾ Fauve-de-Bourgogne × ¼ INRA 1777 (<strong>Crossbreed</strong>). To study the effect of the litter breed composition, two cross-fostering strategies were used for suckled rabbits at birth: within-genetic type and between-genetic type, where the dam raised kits of the same or different genetic types. Litter composition was maintained after weaning. A total of 1 670 growing rabbits were monitored from birth to weaning (at 35 days of age), and then 1 030 rabbits were monitored from weaning to 64 days of age. Four cohorts were raised from September 2019 to April 2020. Health was evaluated using visual health scores and white blood cell counts. Crossbred rabbits had a higher survival rate in the preweaning period (+14.9% points; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and a higher percentage of healthy individuals at 64 days of age (+13.9% points; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) than purebred rabbits, even though the survival rate was equivalent (92%) between the two genetic types in the postweaning period. Crossbred rabbits were lighter than INRA rabbits (−128 g at 64 days of age; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The between-genetic type cross-fostering strategy had a positive effect on survival in the preweaning period (+4.6% points for INRA and +13.3% points for Crossbreed; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) compared to the within-genetic type cross-fostering strategy. No lasting effects of the litter breed composition on postweaning survival or health were observed. Mixing kits of different genetic types within litters may be a strategy to improve the overall herd health and help reduce the use of antibiotics in rabbit farming.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100083,"journal":{"name":"Animal - Open Space","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal - Open Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772694024000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of the breed and the litter breed composition on the growth, survival, and health of rabbits. Two genetic types were compared: purebred INRA 1777 (INRA) and crossbreed ¾ Fauve-de-Bourgogne × ¼ INRA 1777 (Crossbreed). To study the effect of the litter breed composition, two cross-fostering strategies were used for suckled rabbits at birth: within-genetic type and between-genetic type, where the dam raised kits of the same or different genetic types. Litter composition was maintained after weaning. A total of 1 670 growing rabbits were monitored from birth to weaning (at 35 days of age), and then 1 030 rabbits were monitored from weaning to 64 days of age. Four cohorts were raised from September 2019 to April 2020. Health was evaluated using visual health scores and white blood cell counts. Crossbred rabbits had a higher survival rate in the preweaning period (+14.9% points; P < 0.001), and a higher percentage of healthy individuals at 64 days of age (+13.9% points; P < 0.001) than purebred rabbits, even though the survival rate was equivalent (92%) between the two genetic types in the postweaning period. Crossbred rabbits were lighter than INRA rabbits (−128 g at 64 days of age; P < 0.001). The between-genetic type cross-fostering strategy had a positive effect on survival in the preweaning period (+4.6% points for INRA and +13.3% points for Crossbreed; P < 0.001) compared to the within-genetic type cross-fostering strategy. No lasting effects of the litter breed composition on postweaning survival or health were observed. Mixing kits of different genetic types within litters may be a strategy to improve the overall herd health and help reduce the use of antibiotics in rabbit farming.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
品种和窝种组成对家兔生长、生存和健康的影响
本研究旨在探讨品种和窝种组成对家兔生长、生存和健康的影响。比较了两种遗传类型:纯种INRA 1777 (INRA)和杂交品种¾Fauve-de-Bourgogne ×¼INRA 1777(杂种)。为了研究产仔品种组成的影响,在乳兔出生时采用遗传内型和遗传间型两种交叉饲养策略,饲养相同或不同遗传类型的幼兔。断奶后保持凋落物组成。从出生至断奶(35日龄)监测1 670只生长兔,然后从断奶至64日龄监测1 030只。从2019年9月到2020年4月,增加了四个队列。使用视觉健康评分和白细胞计数来评估健康状况。杂交兔断奶前成活率较高(+14.9%;P & lt;0.001), 64日龄健康个体的百分比更高(+13.9%;P & lt;0.001),尽管两种基因型在断奶后的存活率相当(92%)。杂交兔比INRA兔轻(64日龄- 128 g;P & lt;0.001)。遗传型间交叉饲养策略对断奶前成活率有积极影响(INRA +4.6%, Crossbreed +13.3%);P & lt;0.001),与遗传型内交叉培养策略相比。没有观察到窝产仔品种组成对断奶后生存或健康的持久影响。在窝中混合不同基因类型的试剂盒可能是一种策略,可以改善整个群体的健康状况,并有助于减少兔养殖中抗生素的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of the breed and litter breed composition on the growth, survival, and health of rabbits The effect of age on D20, D40 and live foal rates in the Clydesdale mare Impact of the amount of milk replacer offers to Holstein dairy heifers on pre- and postweaning growth Corrigendum to “The role of anti-E. coli antibody from maternal colostrum on the colonization of newborn dairy calves gut with Escherichia coli and the development of clinical diarrhea” [Animal Open Space 2 (2023) 100037] Method: Body composition assessment of sows using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1