Modeling time series of vegetation indices in tallgrass prairie using machine and deep learning algorithms

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Informatics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102917
Pradeep Wagle , Gopichandh Danala , Catherine Donner , Xiangming Xiao , Corey Moffet , Stacey A. Gunter , Wolfgang Jentner , David S. Ebert
{"title":"Modeling time series of vegetation indices in tallgrass prairie using machine and deep learning algorithms","authors":"Pradeep Wagle ,&nbsp;Gopichandh Danala ,&nbsp;Catherine Donner ,&nbsp;Xiangming Xiao ,&nbsp;Corey Moffet ,&nbsp;Stacey A. Gunter ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Jentner ,&nbsp;David S. Ebert","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The vegetation phenology of tallgrass prairie varies yearly, depending on climatic conditions, plant species composition, and location. Modeling time series of vegetation indices (VIs) using climate data can be useful for understanding and predicting how tallgrass prairie will respond to future climate scenarios and for identifying and managing areas of tallgrass prairie that are particularly susceptible to climate-induced changes. Machine or deep learning algorithms can be well-suited to model VIs for phenology studies by identifying patterns and relationships between climatic factors and VIs using historical data. This study evaluated the performance of 12 machine and deep learning algorithms, encompassing a diverse range of algorithmic families, in modeling patterns of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer-derived enhanced vegetation index (EVI, greenness index) and land surface water index (LSWI) in native tallgrass prairie. The models include linear regression, Bayesian ridge, elastic net, decision tree, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), support vector regression (SVR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network (ANN), convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM). Air and soil temperatures showed the highest correlations with EVI (<em>r</em> ≥ 0.77) and LSWI (<em>r</em> ≥ 0.56). The low correlation (<em>r</em> ≤ 0.23) of EVI and LSWI with contemporaneous rainfall or soil moisture suggests vegetation's delayed response to these factors. The results indicated that ensemble methods like XGBoost and random forest performed best across all three datasets (i.e., training, testing, and validation) for modeling EVI and LSWI. Deep learning models showed varying performance across datasets, and their performance was sub-optimal compared to XGBoost and random forest. The linear regression also showed a moderate performance, while the decision tree performed the weakest overall. The strong performance of XGBoost and random forest highlights the intricate and nonlinear relationship of prairie vegetation with climatic factors. These models' strength lies in capturing such complexities. This study provides insights into the key climatic factors and underlying processes that control the vegetation dynamics of tallgrass prairie ecosystems. Our machine learning models can be a valuable tool for developing new strategies to manage tallgrass prairie ecosystems in the face of climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 102917"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157495412400459X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vegetation phenology of tallgrass prairie varies yearly, depending on climatic conditions, plant species composition, and location. Modeling time series of vegetation indices (VIs) using climate data can be useful for understanding and predicting how tallgrass prairie will respond to future climate scenarios and for identifying and managing areas of tallgrass prairie that are particularly susceptible to climate-induced changes. Machine or deep learning algorithms can be well-suited to model VIs for phenology studies by identifying patterns and relationships between climatic factors and VIs using historical data. This study evaluated the performance of 12 machine and deep learning algorithms, encompassing a diverse range of algorithmic families, in modeling patterns of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer-derived enhanced vegetation index (EVI, greenness index) and land surface water index (LSWI) in native tallgrass prairie. The models include linear regression, Bayesian ridge, elastic net, decision tree, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), support vector regression (SVR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network (ANN), convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM). Air and soil temperatures showed the highest correlations with EVI (r ≥ 0.77) and LSWI (r ≥ 0.56). The low correlation (r ≤ 0.23) of EVI and LSWI with contemporaneous rainfall or soil moisture suggests vegetation's delayed response to these factors. The results indicated that ensemble methods like XGBoost and random forest performed best across all three datasets (i.e., training, testing, and validation) for modeling EVI and LSWI. Deep learning models showed varying performance across datasets, and their performance was sub-optimal compared to XGBoost and random forest. The linear regression also showed a moderate performance, while the decision tree performed the weakest overall. The strong performance of XGBoost and random forest highlights the intricate and nonlinear relationship of prairie vegetation with climatic factors. These models' strength lies in capturing such complexities. This study provides insights into the key climatic factors and underlying processes that control the vegetation dynamics of tallgrass prairie ecosystems. Our machine learning models can be a valuable tool for developing new strategies to manage tallgrass prairie ecosystems in the face of climate change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
期刊最新文献
A novel model for mapping soil organic matter: Integrating temporal and spatial characteristics A deep learning model for detecting and classifying multiple marine mammal species from passive acoustic data Impact of discharge regulation on zooplankton communities regarding indicator species and their thresholds in the cascade weirs of the Yeongsan River Study of underwater sound propagation and attenuation characteristics at the Yangjiang offshore wind farma Spatiotemporal analysis of ocean primary productivity in Bohai Sea estimated using improved DINEOF reconstructed MODIS data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1