Exploring the relationship between ERCC1 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: Insights from an in-depth meta-analysis

IF 0.5 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Human Gene Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.humgen.2024.201361
Praveen Kumar Kampalli , Mohan Krishna Ghanta , Henu Kumar Verma , Afroz Alam , Sujatha Peela , LVKS Bhaskar
{"title":"Exploring the relationship between ERCC1 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: Insights from an in-depth meta-analysis","authors":"Praveen Kumar Kampalli ,&nbsp;Mohan Krishna Ghanta ,&nbsp;Henu Kumar Verma ,&nbsp;Afroz Alam ,&nbsp;Sujatha Peela ,&nbsp;LVKS Bhaskar","doi":"10.1016/j.humgen.2024.201361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In recent decades, there has been mounting evidence linking Excision repair cross-complementing gene (ERCC1) polymorphisms to colorectal cancer (CRC). According to recent epidemiological research, the ERCC1 polymorphism may have an impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there is controversy on ERCC1 genetic variants affecting CRC in these studies. Hence, this meta-analysis study aimed to analyze the link between CRC and ERCC1 gene polymorphism.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We looked up information on the impact of ERCC1 genetic variations on CRC development in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase. Addressing the risk of colorectal cancer associated with mutations in the ERCC1 gene, no meta-analysis was conducted. Using Stata (version 12.0) applications, we effectively conducted a meta-analysis of thirteen case-control investigations and integrated the pooled odds ratios (ORs) according to a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of the overall and subgroup analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>According to our findings, there appears to have been a noteworthy association found between rs3212986 and the risk of CRC in both the allele genetic model (OR 95 % CI = 1:44 (1.21–1.71) and the dominant genetic model (OR 95 % CI = 1:04 (0.93–1.15) for overall CRC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis showed that rs3212986 polymorphism was significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk, whereas rs11615 polymorphism was not significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29686,"journal":{"name":"Human Gene","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 201361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Gene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773044124001050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In recent decades, there has been mounting evidence linking Excision repair cross-complementing gene (ERCC1) polymorphisms to colorectal cancer (CRC). According to recent epidemiological research, the ERCC1 polymorphism may have an impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there is controversy on ERCC1 genetic variants affecting CRC in these studies. Hence, this meta-analysis study aimed to analyze the link between CRC and ERCC1 gene polymorphism.

Methodology

We looked up information on the impact of ERCC1 genetic variations on CRC development in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase. Addressing the risk of colorectal cancer associated with mutations in the ERCC1 gene, no meta-analysis was conducted. Using Stata (version 12.0) applications, we effectively conducted a meta-analysis of thirteen case-control investigations and integrated the pooled odds ratios (ORs) according to a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of the overall and subgroup analysis.

Results

According to our findings, there appears to have been a noteworthy association found between rs3212986 and the risk of CRC in both the allele genetic model (OR 95 % CI = 1:44 (1.21–1.71) and the dominant genetic model (OR 95 % CI = 1:04 (0.93–1.15) for overall CRC.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis showed that rs3212986 polymorphism was significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk, whereas rs11615 polymorphism was not significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨ERCC1多态性与结直肠癌风险之间的关系:来自深入荟萃分析的见解
近几十年来,越来越多的证据表明,切除修复交叉互补基因(ERCC1)多态性与结直肠癌(CRC)有关。最近的流行病学研究表明,ERCC1多态性可能与结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率有关。然而,在这些研究中,对于ERCC1基因变异是否影响结直肠癌存在争议。因此,本荟萃分析研究旨在分析CRC与ERCC1基因多态性之间的联系。方法:我们在Web of Science、PubMed和Embase中查询了ERCC1基因变异对结直肠癌发展的影响。针对与ERCC1基因突变相关的结直肠癌风险,未进行meta分析。使用Stata (version 12.0)应用程序,我们有效地对13例病例对照调查进行了荟萃分析,并根据总体和亚组分析的95%置信区间(CI)整合了合并优势比(ORs)。根据我们的研究结果,rs3212986与CRC风险之间似乎存在显著的关联,无论是等位基因遗传模型(OR 95% CI = 1:44(1.21-1.71)还是显性遗传模型(OR 95% CI = 1:04(0.93-1.15)。结论综上所述,本荟萃分析结果显示rs3212986多态性与结直肠癌风险显著相关,而rs11615多态性与结直肠癌风险无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Gene
Human Gene Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (General), Genetics
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring the relationship between ERCC1 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: Insights from an in-depth meta-analysis Solute carrier family 2 members (SLC2A) as potential targets for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients Meta-analysis of genes and genetic variants implicated in Type II diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic nephropathy Network pharmacology and molecular docking insights into Sirtuin-2 inhibitors (AK-7 and AGK-2): A synergistic strategy for COPD treatment β2_adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms p.Gly16Arg and p. Glu27Gln in Sudanese patients with bronchial asthma: A case-control study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1