Eugene T.Y. Ang , Prasanta Bhattacharya , Andrew E.B. Lim
{"title":"Estimating policy effects in a social network with independent set sampling","authors":"Eugene T.Y. Ang , Prasanta Bhattacharya , Andrew E.B. Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating the impact of policy interventions on respondents who are embedded in a social network is often challenging due to the presence of network interference within the treatment groups, as well as between treatment and non-treatment groups. In this paper, we propose a novel empirical strategy that combines network sampling based on the identification of independent sets with a stochastic actor-oriented model (SAOM) to infer the direct and net effects of a policy. By assigning respondents from an independent set to the treatment, we are able to block direct spillover of the treatment among the treated respondents for an extended period of time, during which the direct effect of the treatment can be isolated from the associated network interference. We empirically demonstrate this using a simulation-based evaluation of a fictitious policy implementation using both real-life and generated networks, and use a counterfactual approach to estimate the treatment effect of the policy. Our results highlight the effectiveness of our proposed empirical strategy, and notably, the role of network sampling techniques in influencing the evaluation of policy effects. The findings from this study have the potential to help researchers and policymakers with planning, designing, and anticipating policy responses in a networked society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"81 ","pages":"Pages 17-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaluating the impact of policy interventions on respondents who are embedded in a social network is often challenging due to the presence of network interference within the treatment groups, as well as between treatment and non-treatment groups. In this paper, we propose a novel empirical strategy that combines network sampling based on the identification of independent sets with a stochastic actor-oriented model (SAOM) to infer the direct and net effects of a policy. By assigning respondents from an independent set to the treatment, we are able to block direct spillover of the treatment among the treated respondents for an extended period of time, during which the direct effect of the treatment can be isolated from the associated network interference. We empirically demonstrate this using a simulation-based evaluation of a fictitious policy implementation using both real-life and generated networks, and use a counterfactual approach to estimate the treatment effect of the policy. Our results highlight the effectiveness of our proposed empirical strategy, and notably, the role of network sampling techniques in influencing the evaluation of policy effects. The findings from this study have the potential to help researchers and policymakers with planning, designing, and anticipating policy responses in a networked society.
期刊介绍:
Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.