{"title":"Hearing the unheard: Fundamentals of acoustic emission signals as predictors of total hip arthroplasty implant loosening","authors":"Magnus Reulbach , Longwei Cong , Bernd-Arno Behrens , Eike Jakubowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implant loosening remains a primary cause of failure of total hip arthroplasty<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> (THA) and is often detected late, when pain occurs. Acoustic emission<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span> (AE) analysis is a promising method for early loosening detection, on the supposition that relative movements at the bone–implant interface induce detectable AE signals. To distinguish loosening-induced AE signals from those of stable THA components <em>in vitro</em> investigations are necessary. Substituting human with animal bone for such testing could enable simplified and cost-effective sample preparation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether AE signals differ between bone tissues of different species. AE signals generated by relative movements between TiAl<sub>6</sub>V<sub>4</sub> and human, bovine, and porcine cortical bone were investigated. Per species, 125 movements were analyzed, with 26 AE features identified for each movement. The most important time and frequency features of AE signals from human bone differed significantly from those of both animal species. Signals of human origin were longer and exhibited higher rise time. The main frequency components of human AE signals were in a lower frequency range, with a centroid frequency of 113.7 kHz. Based on these differences, it is not advisable to replace human cortical bone with animal bone for AE-related <em>in vitro</em> studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 104266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135045332400167X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Implant loosening remains a primary cause of failure of total hip arthroplasty1 (THA) and is often detected late, when pain occurs. Acoustic emission2 (AE) analysis is a promising method for early loosening detection, on the supposition that relative movements at the bone–implant interface induce detectable AE signals. To distinguish loosening-induced AE signals from those of stable THA components in vitro investigations are necessary. Substituting human with animal bone for such testing could enable simplified and cost-effective sample preparation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether AE signals differ between bone tissues of different species. AE signals generated by relative movements between TiAl6V4 and human, bovine, and porcine cortical bone were investigated. Per species, 125 movements were analyzed, with 26 AE features identified for each movement. The most important time and frequency features of AE signals from human bone differed significantly from those of both animal species. Signals of human origin were longer and exhibited higher rise time. The main frequency components of human AE signals were in a lower frequency range, with a centroid frequency of 113.7 kHz. Based on these differences, it is not advisable to replace human cortical bone with animal bone for AE-related in vitro studies.
期刊介绍:
Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.