Does gamified training improve training performance? A dual-pathway moderated mediation model

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115086
Song Liu, Hao Zhou
{"title":"Does gamified training improve training performance? A dual-pathway moderated mediation model","authors":"Song Liu,&nbsp;Hao Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although gamification has grown in popularity in organizational training, scientific evidence verifying the benefits of gamified training is mixed, and the underlying mechanisms of it on training outputs remain unclear. Drawing upon the technology-enhanced training effectiveness model and cognitive-affective personality system theory, this research constructs a dual-pathway moderated mediation model explaining how gamified training shapes training performance, including knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs). Adopting a randomized field experiment, the results indicated that gamified training significantly promoted knowledge and attitudes via enhancing goal commitment and perceived enjoyment, but exerted no significant influence on skills. Moreover, need for achievement moderated the effect of gamified training on goal commitment and its indirect effect on KSAs via goal commitment. Furthermore, hedonic need moderated the effect of gamified training on perceived enjoyment and its indirect effect on knowledge and attitudes via perceived enjoyment. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 115086"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324005903","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although gamification has grown in popularity in organizational training, scientific evidence verifying the benefits of gamified training is mixed, and the underlying mechanisms of it on training outputs remain unclear. Drawing upon the technology-enhanced training effectiveness model and cognitive-affective personality system theory, this research constructs a dual-pathway moderated mediation model explaining how gamified training shapes training performance, including knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs). Adopting a randomized field experiment, the results indicated that gamified training significantly promoted knowledge and attitudes via enhancing goal commitment and perceived enjoyment, but exerted no significant influence on skills. Moreover, need for achievement moderated the effect of gamified training on goal commitment and its indirect effect on KSAs via goal commitment. Furthermore, hedonic need moderated the effect of gamified training on perceived enjoyment and its indirect effect on knowledge and attitudes via perceived enjoyment. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游戏化训练能提高训练成绩吗?双途径调节的中介模型
尽管游戏化在组织培训中越来越受欢迎,但验证游戏化培训好处的科学证据参差不齐,其对培训产出的潜在机制仍不清楚。本研究利用技术增强训练效果模型和认知-情感人格系统理论,构建了一个双路径调节的中介模型,解释游戏化训练如何塑造训练绩效,包括知识、技能和态度。采用随机现场实验,结果表明游戏化训练通过提高目标承诺和感知享受显著提高知识和态度,但对技能没有显著影响。此外,成就需求调节了游戏化训练对目标承诺的影响,并通过目标承诺间接调节了游戏化训练对ksa的影响。此外,享乐需求调节了游戏化训练对感知享受的影响,以及游戏化训练通过感知享受对知识和态度的间接影响。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable development at a temporal crossroads: Learning from the past while focusing on the future The effects of dual-oriented branding strategies on brand equity through innovation investment Marketing strategy implementation: Why is it so hard? Online chat encounters: Satisfying customers through dialogical interaction Overcoming reactance to climate change: The business-ecology nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1