Impact of colorectal cancer screening by primary tumor location in a real-world setting in Japan.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY European Journal of Cancer Prevention Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000940
Takeshi Makiuchi, Ling Zha, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Tomotaka Sobue, Toshio Ogawa
{"title":"Impact of colorectal cancer screening by primary tumor location in a real-world setting in Japan.","authors":"Takeshi Makiuchi, Ling Zha, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Tomotaka Sobue, Toshio Ogawa","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this retrospective observational study was to investigate the impact of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by primary tumor location. We compared the risk of requiring treatment for advanced disease and total medical costs per patient between CRC patients who underwent FOBT within 1 year before initial treatment for CRC and those who did not, using the JMDC Claims database, large-scale health insurance claims and checkup data in Japan. Treatment for advanced disease was defined as (1) nonendoscopic therapy or (2) chemotherapy or radiotherapy, performed during the follow-up period. A total of 1194 participants with CRC (right-sided, 22.2%; left-sided, 60.4%) who initiated treatment between 2010 and 2016 and underwent health checkups within 1 year before the initial treatment were enrolled and followed up for an average of 46.1 months. A significantly lowered risk ratio (RR) of chemotherapy or radiotherapy and total medical costs were observed in FOBT group for left-sided CRC [RR = 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.97), mean and median costs = 4.1 vs. 5.6 and 2.4 vs. 2.9 million JPY; P  = 0.018], while they were not observed for right-sided CRC [RR = 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.28), mean and median costs = 4.0 vs. 4.1 and 2.7 vs. 2.9 million JPY; P  = 0.995]. This study demonstrated the improved outcomes by FOBT for left-sided CRC, whereas its impact was limited for right-sided CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"519-527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this retrospective observational study was to investigate the impact of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by primary tumor location. We compared the risk of requiring treatment for advanced disease and total medical costs per patient between CRC patients who underwent FOBT within 1 year before initial treatment for CRC and those who did not, using the JMDC Claims database, large-scale health insurance claims and checkup data in Japan. Treatment for advanced disease was defined as (1) nonendoscopic therapy or (2) chemotherapy or radiotherapy, performed during the follow-up period. A total of 1194 participants with CRC (right-sided, 22.2%; left-sided, 60.4%) who initiated treatment between 2010 and 2016 and underwent health checkups within 1 year before the initial treatment were enrolled and followed up for an average of 46.1 months. A significantly lowered risk ratio (RR) of chemotherapy or radiotherapy and total medical costs were observed in FOBT group for left-sided CRC [RR = 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.97), mean and median costs = 4.1 vs. 5.6 and 2.4 vs. 2.9 million JPY; P  = 0.018], while they were not observed for right-sided CRC [RR = 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.28), mean and median costs = 4.0 vs. 4.1 and 2.7 vs. 2.9 million JPY; P  = 0.995]. This study demonstrated the improved outcomes by FOBT for left-sided CRC, whereas its impact was limited for right-sided CRC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在日本,原发肿瘤位置对结直肠癌筛查的影响。
本回顾性观察性研究的目的是探讨粪便隐血试验(FOBT)作为结肠直肠癌(CRC)原发肿瘤部位筛查的影响。我们使用JMDC索赔数据库、日本大规模健康保险索赔和检查数据,比较了在CRC初始治疗前1年内接受FOBT的CRC患者和未接受FOBT的CRC患者的晚期疾病需要治疗的风险和每位患者的总医疗费用。晚期疾病的治疗定义为(1)非内镜治疗或(2)在随访期间进行化疗或放疗。共1194名CRC患者(右侧,22.2%;左侧(60.4%)在2010年至2016年期间开始治疗,并在初始治疗前一年内接受了健康检查,平均随访46.1个月。FOBT组左侧CRC化疗或放疗的风险比(RR)和总医疗费用显著降低[RR = 0.78(95%可信区间,0.63-0.97),平均和中位数费用= 4.1 vs. 5.6和2.4 vs. 290万日元;P = 0.018],而右侧CRC未观察到[RR = 0.88(95%可信区间,0.61-1.28),平均和中位数成本= 4.0 vs. 4.1和270 vs. 290万日元;P = 0.995]。本研究表明,FOBT改善了左侧结直肠癌的预后,而其对右侧结直肠癌的影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
期刊最新文献
Development of a prediction model based on Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte count, and Platelet-score for lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. The global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer attributable to smoking from 1990 to 2021: a population-based study. High utilization of colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing for screening or diagnostic purposes in Germany: a longitudinal analysis. Global and regional burden of kidney cancer due to high body index in adults from 1990 to 2021 and predictions to 2036. Burden and risk factors of colorectal cancer in Europe from 1990 to 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1