Results of a qualitative semi-structured interview study with hospital nursing staff to improve incident reporting systems in Estonia.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.10.003
E Uibu, K Binsol, K Põlluste, M Lember, M Kangasniemi
{"title":"Results of a qualitative semi-structured interview study with hospital nursing staff to improve incident reporting systems in Estonia.","authors":"E Uibu, K Binsol, K Põlluste, M Lember, M Kangasniemi","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nurses and their leaders are known for actively using incident reporting systems. However, information sharing about lessons learned from incidents has rarely been reported in previous studies. This study aimed to describe nurses' and nursing managers' experiences with incident reporting system information sharing and their perceptions of patient safety development needs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Semi-structured individual and group interviews were conducted with nursing staff in Estonia (n=26). Collected data was analyzed using the inductive content analysis method. The COREQ checklist was used for study report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursing staff considered information sharing of lessons learned crucial. First, it was necessary to raise patient safety awareness among employees. Second, the importance of learning from mistakes to protect themselves from legal consequences and improve public trust was highlighted. Nursing staff had traditional ways of sharing information about lessons learned. However, because of the lack of organized strategies, nurses resorted to private discussions or self-initiated investigations. Nursing staff reported a need to develop patient safety by supporting nurses' patient safety competencies and training, and to establish the use of a reporting system in daily care. The precondition was a positive patient safety culture, which would be improved by open communication among nursing staff and sufficient resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Information sharing from safety incident reports should rely on organized strategies to avoid self-initiated practices and misinformation. Awareness of the complexity of implementing patient safety initiatives and adequate responsiveness from hospital executives can help establish practices supporting staff to feel secure when discussing safety issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.10.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Nurses and their leaders are known for actively using incident reporting systems. However, information sharing about lessons learned from incidents has rarely been reported in previous studies. This study aimed to describe nurses' and nursing managers' experiences with incident reporting system information sharing and their perceptions of patient safety development needs.

Material and methods: Semi-structured individual and group interviews were conducted with nursing staff in Estonia (n=26). Collected data was analyzed using the inductive content analysis method. The COREQ checklist was used for study report.

Results: Nursing staff considered information sharing of lessons learned crucial. First, it was necessary to raise patient safety awareness among employees. Second, the importance of learning from mistakes to protect themselves from legal consequences and improve public trust was highlighted. Nursing staff had traditional ways of sharing information about lessons learned. However, because of the lack of organized strategies, nurses resorted to private discussions or self-initiated investigations. Nursing staff reported a need to develop patient safety by supporting nurses' patient safety competencies and training, and to establish the use of a reporting system in daily care. The precondition was a positive patient safety culture, which would be improved by open communication among nursing staff and sufficient resources.

Conclusions: Information sharing from safety incident reports should rely on organized strategies to avoid self-initiated practices and misinformation. Awareness of the complexity of implementing patient safety initiatives and adequate responsiveness from hospital executives can help establish practices supporting staff to feel secure when discussing safety issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
Results of a qualitative semi-structured interview study with hospital nursing staff to improve incident reporting systems in Estonia. Validity, reliability, and feasibility of EQ-5D-3L, VAS, and time trade-off among Jordanians. [Patient safety benchmarks: From myth to reality]. Patient's experience as a tool in analyzing primary care in Catalonia. Informational and educational needs of caregivers of neurologic inpatients in rehabilitation treatment: A qualitative exploratory study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1