Results of a qualitative semi-structured interview study with hospital nursing staff to improve incident reporting systems in Estonia.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.10.003
E Uibu, K Binsol, K Põlluste, M Lember, M Kangasniemi
{"title":"Results of a qualitative semi-structured interview study with hospital nursing staff to improve incident reporting systems in Estonia.","authors":"E Uibu, K Binsol, K Põlluste, M Lember, M Kangasniemi","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nurses and their leaders are known for actively using incident reporting systems. However, information sharing about lessons learned from incidents has rarely been reported in previous studies. This study aimed to describe nurses' and nursing managers' experiences with incident reporting system information sharing and their perceptions of patient safety development needs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Semi-structured individual and group interviews were conducted with nursing staff in Estonia (n=26). Collected data was analyzed using the inductive content analysis method. The COREQ checklist was used for study report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursing staff considered information sharing of lessons learned crucial. First, it was necessary to raise patient safety awareness among employees. Second, the importance of learning from mistakes to protect themselves from legal consequences and improve public trust was highlighted. Nursing staff had traditional ways of sharing information about lessons learned. However, because of the lack of organized strategies, nurses resorted to private discussions or self-initiated investigations. Nursing staff reported a need to develop patient safety by supporting nurses' patient safety competencies and training, and to establish the use of a reporting system in daily care. The precondition was a positive patient safety culture, which would be improved by open communication among nursing staff and sufficient resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Information sharing from safety incident reports should rely on organized strategies to avoid self-initiated practices and misinformation. Awareness of the complexity of implementing patient safety initiatives and adequate responsiveness from hospital executives can help establish practices supporting staff to feel secure when discussing safety issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.10.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Nurses and their leaders are known for actively using incident reporting systems. However, information sharing about lessons learned from incidents has rarely been reported in previous studies. This study aimed to describe nurses' and nursing managers' experiences with incident reporting system information sharing and their perceptions of patient safety development needs.

Material and methods: Semi-structured individual and group interviews were conducted with nursing staff in Estonia (n=26). Collected data was analyzed using the inductive content analysis method. The COREQ checklist was used for study report.

Results: Nursing staff considered information sharing of lessons learned crucial. First, it was necessary to raise patient safety awareness among employees. Second, the importance of learning from mistakes to protect themselves from legal consequences and improve public trust was highlighted. Nursing staff had traditional ways of sharing information about lessons learned. However, because of the lack of organized strategies, nurses resorted to private discussions or self-initiated investigations. Nursing staff reported a need to develop patient safety by supporting nurses' patient safety competencies and training, and to establish the use of a reporting system in daily care. The precondition was a positive patient safety culture, which would be improved by open communication among nursing staff and sufficient resources.

Conclusions: Information sharing from safety incident reports should rely on organized strategies to avoid self-initiated practices and misinformation. Awareness of the complexity of implementing patient safety initiatives and adequate responsiveness from hospital executives can help establish practices supporting staff to feel secure when discussing safety issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项定性半结构化访谈研究的结果与医院护理人员改善事故报告系统在爱沙尼亚。
目的:护士及其领导以积极使用事件报告系统而闻名。然而,在以往的研究中,很少有关于从事件中吸取教训的信息共享的报道。本研究旨在描述护士和护理管理者在事件报告系统信息共享方面的经验,以及他们对患者安全发展需求的看法。材料和方法:对爱沙尼亚的护理人员进行半结构化的个人和小组访谈(n=26)。采用归纳内容分析法对收集到的数据进行分析。研究报告采用COREQ检查表。结果:护理人员认为经验教训的信息共享至关重要。首先,有必要提高员工的患者安全意识。其次,强调了从错误中吸取教训以保护自己免受法律后果和提高公众信任的重要性。护理人员有分享经验教训信息的传统方式。然而,由于缺乏有组织的策略,护士诉诸于私下讨论或自我发起的调查。护理人员报告说,需要通过支持护士的患者安全能力和培训来发展患者安全,并在日常护理中建立使用报告系统。前提条件是积极的患者安全文化,通过护理人员之间的开放沟通和充足的资源可以改善患者安全文化。结论:安全事故报告中的信息共享应该依赖于有组织的策略,以避免自发的做法和错误的信息。认识到实施患者安全举措的复杂性以及医院管理人员的充分响应,可以帮助建立实践,支持员工在讨论安全问题时感到安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
The person-centered medical care in pediatrics: A scoping review. [Exploring the voice of patients: Mapping their experience following care in an integrated health area]. [Humanization and professional quality of life in oncohematology and radiotherapy care: A descriptive study in a university hospital]. [Development of a checklist for the handoff of surgical pediatric patients in the PICU]. Optimizing length of hospital stay among inpatients with spinal cord injury: An observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1