The initial results of MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy in high volume tertiary center.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiology and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-28 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.2478/raon-2024-0060
Tomaz Smrkolj, Milena Taskovska, Iztok Ditz, Klemen Cernelc, Simon Hawlina
{"title":"The initial results of MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy in high volume tertiary center.","authors":"Tomaz Smrkolj, Milena Taskovska, Iztok Ditz, Klemen Cernelc, Simon Hawlina","doi":"10.2478/raon-2024-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a prerequisite for targeted prostate biopsy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance and learning curve of the mpMRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) software image fusion (MRI-TRUS fusion) biopsy (BX) process in the first year after its introduction in our urology department.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>MRI-TRUS fusion BX was performed in 293 patients with at least one Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) ≥3 lesion. The proportion of patients and lesions with positive histopathologic result for prostate cancer (PCa) was analyzed. The learning curve for MRI-TRUS fusion BX was assessed at institutional and individual level. Positive BX lesions were further analyzed by PIRADS and Gleason scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of patients with positive histopathologic results for targeted BX, systematic BX, and combined BX was 53.9%, 47.9%, and 63.5%, respectively. The chi-square test for the proportion of PCa positive patients showed no significant difference between the time-based patient groups at the institutional level and no significant difference between individual urologists. PIRADS score (p < 0.001), total PSA concentration (p = 0.05), prostate volume (p < 0.001) and number of cores per lesion (p = 0.034) were significant predictors of a positive histopathologic result in a lesion-based analysis. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was confirmed in 34.7% of the 412 BX lesions and 76.4% of the 187 positive PCa lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRI-TRUS fusion targeted BX significantly improves the overall rate of PCa detection compared with systematic BX alone. No steep learning curve was observed in our urologists. The proportion of lesions with clinically insignificant PCa was low, limiting overdiagnosis of PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":"58 4","pages":"501-508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a prerequisite for targeted prostate biopsy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance and learning curve of the mpMRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) software image fusion (MRI-TRUS fusion) biopsy (BX) process in the first year after its introduction in our urology department.

Patients and methods: MRI-TRUS fusion BX was performed in 293 patients with at least one Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) ≥3 lesion. The proportion of patients and lesions with positive histopathologic result for prostate cancer (PCa) was analyzed. The learning curve for MRI-TRUS fusion BX was assessed at institutional and individual level. Positive BX lesions were further analyzed by PIRADS and Gleason scores.

Results: The proportion of patients with positive histopathologic results for targeted BX, systematic BX, and combined BX was 53.9%, 47.9%, and 63.5%, respectively. The chi-square test for the proportion of PCa positive patients showed no significant difference between the time-based patient groups at the institutional level and no significant difference between individual urologists. PIRADS score (p < 0.001), total PSA concentration (p = 0.05), prostate volume (p < 0.001) and number of cores per lesion (p = 0.034) were significant predictors of a positive histopathologic result in a lesion-based analysis. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was confirmed in 34.7% of the 412 BX lesions and 76.4% of the 187 positive PCa lesions.

Conclusions: MRI-TRUS fusion targeted BX significantly improves the overall rate of PCa detection compared with systematic BX alone. No steep learning curve was observed in our urologists. The proportion of lesions with clinically insignificant PCa was low, limiting overdiagnosis of PCa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高容积三级中心MRI-TRUS融合前列腺活检的初步结果。
背景:多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)是靶向前列腺活检的先决条件。我们的研究目的是评估mpmri -经直肠超声(TRUS)软件图像融合(MRI-TRUS融合)活检(BX)在泌尿科引入后第一年的表现和学习曲线。患者和方法:对293例至少有一个前列腺影像学报告和数据系统(PIRADS)≥3级病变的患者进行MRI-TRUS融合BX。分析前列腺癌(PCa)组织病理学结果阳性的患者和病变比例。在机构和个人层面评估MRI-TRUS融合BX的学习曲线。通过PIRADS和Gleason评分进一步分析BX阳性病变。结果:靶向性BX、系统性BX和联合BX组织病理学结果阳性的患者比例分别为53.9%、47.9%和63.5%。PCa阳性患者比例的卡方检验显示,在机构水平上,基于时间的患者组之间无显著差异,在泌尿科医生个体之间无显著差异。在基于病变的分析中,PIRADS评分(p < 0.001)、总PSA浓度(p = 0.05)、前列腺体积(p < 0.001)和每个病变核数(p = 0.034)是组织病理学阳性结果的显著预测因子。412例BX病变中有34.7%确诊为临床显著性PCa (csPCa), 187例阳性病变中有76.4%确诊为csPCa。结论:与单独系统BX相比,MRI-TRUS融合靶向BX可显著提高前列腺癌的总体检出率。我们的泌尿科医生没有观察到陡峭的学习曲线。临床不明显的PCa病变比例较低,限制了PCa的过度诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
期刊最新文献
Pulsed field ablation in medicine: irreversible electroporation and electropermeabilization theory and applications. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: role of bevacizumab and HPV vaccination. A literature review with case presentations. Bronchial bacterial colonization and the susceptibility of isolated bacteria in patients with lung malignancy. Cardiac MRI for differentiating chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in sarcoma and breast cancer. Comparison of 2D and 3D radiomics features with conventional features based on contrast-enhanced CT images for preoperative prediction the risk of thymic epithelial tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1